Stoke-on-Trent BNP leader Michael Coleman 'will risk jail for free speech' after receiving suspended sentence
STOKE-ON-TRENT BNP leader Michael Coleman says he will risk jail by continuing to post political articles on his blog.
The former city councillor, right, received a suspended eight-month sentence at Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court yesterday, after being convicted of racially-aggravated harassment.
-

Stoke-on-Trent BNP leader Michael Coleman outside court yesterday.
Coleman wrote two blogs responding to last summer's riots, claiming that the city was being 'flooded with Muslims and blacks'.
But the 46-year-old vowed to continue publishing his extremist views – despite the fact that he will be jailed if he re-offends in the next 12 months.
8kg 1400 spin A+++ rated washer
with a full 6 year warranty - yes SIX years
delivered FAST & FREE
was OVER £600 - For a limited time ONLY £449.90
Amazing value!!!
Terms:
8kg 1400 spin A+++ rated washer
with a full 6 year warranty - yes SIX years
delivered FAST & FREE
was OVER £600 - For a limited time ONLY £449.90
Amazing value!!!
Contact: 01782 342609
Valid until: Saturday, June 01 2013
Coleman, of Caverswall Road, Weston Coyney, was entirely unrepentant upon leaving court, and claimed he had simply been exercising his freedom of speech.
He said: "I would like to make it clear that I deny breaking any of the traditional laws of this country. I didn't harass anybody. It was not my intention to harass anybody. Posting an article on a personal blog could never be construed as harassment, not in a free country. This is political correctness in law form.
"I am a freeborn Englishman. My forefathers fought in two world wars to protect the freedom we have today. I will be damned if these hard-won freedoms will be taken away in the 21st century.
"I believe I will go to prison, not today, but in the future, if this regime continues to restrict the freedoms of this country."
Coleman served as a member of Stoke-on-Trent City Council for four years up until 2011, when all five BNP candidates were rejected by voters.
But he continued to play an active role in politics as BNP local leader.
In August and September last year, he posted two articles on his Stoke Patriot website, commenting on the riots which had swept London and other cities.
Coleman said the riots exemplified 'the difference in personality, perceptions and values of people of the darker races and ourselves'.
He also accused the city council of overseeing a 'complete population replacement programme – darkies in, whites out'.
Labour city councillor Joy Garner called in the police after being asked to read the blogs by a member of the public.
Coleman denied intending to cause harassment, alarm or distress, but was convicted by a jury following a trial earlier this month.
Patrick Thompson, mitigating, told the court that regardless of his politics, Coleman was a hardworking family man who had served his community.
He said: "In my submission, this certainly isn't the worst example of an offence of this nature. He wasn't asking people to take up arms or anything like that."
Mr Thompson also warned that a harsh punishment would turn Coleman into a martyr.
Judge Robert Trevor-Jones, who ordered Coleman to complete 240 hours of unpaid work, told the defendant that his words had the potential to 'fan the flames' in the wake of the riots.
Coleman's suspended sentence means he will be barred from standing in a local council election for the next five years.
Mrs Garner, left, said she was happy with Coleman's sentence: "I would like to see him carry out his community service in different areas of the city, so he can see for himself that the diverse culture of our city is no threat to rest of the country."
Read Sentinel editor Mike Sassi's comments on the case at www.thisis staffordshire.co.uk/liberty




Comments
by egreg
Monday, October 08 2012, 10:47PM
“Joy Garner and Labour25 http://tinyurl.com/9tul23n”
by Johntoe
Thursday, October 04 2012, 6:26PM
“Warren, ONLY if by "fruit" you are talking about the stuff we eat, Those BNP 'chaps' wouldn't want you implying anything, and that said 'fruit' was of British origin of course, none of that foreign 'muck'....”
by warren-lloyd
Thursday, October 04 2012, 5:16PM
“Are we talking fruit corners hear Stokiemart.”
by stokiemart
Thursday, October 04 2012, 3:22PM
“I concur John, though of course the BNP as a political party do not consider themselves to be Nazi's as they claim not to be racial supremacists.
My experience gained from meeting and engaging with members of the BNP over the years is that if they are being true to themselves they should perhaps think very carefully before claiming they have any supremacy over anything more cultured than a yoghurt. But that's just my subjective opinion of course.
The FACT is that racism is taught and learned, it is never born. And that is where the racists' 'learning disability' starts and ends :-)”
by Johntoe
Thursday, October 04 2012, 2:40PM
“Actually Stokiemart,
Godwins law which basically says that in ANY internet discussion, no matter what the topic may be, sooner or later someone will make a comparison or a reference to Hitler or Nazi Germany, and as such the discussion will be deemed over,
or words to that effect,
Well, as we are discussing Coleman, who is a member of and mouthpiece for the BNP, a political party that the vast majority of the British public accept is a racist party or at least a party with an ultra right wing agenda (that's me being painfully polite right there)
and as Hitler and the Nazi party were also a party/movement based of a belief of racial superiority and a hatred of races they saw as inferior,
Then it is quite acceptable to bring Hitler and the Nazi party into the conversation,
So Godwins law doesn't strictly apply in this case,”
by stokiemart
Thursday, October 04 2012, 1:46PM
“Then again maybe not.... One wonder whether the Sentinel have a vested interest in blocking links to GODWINS LAW. After all its adoption may be seen as an obstacle to the many in depth intellectual discussions held on this site :-)”
by stokiemart
Thursday, October 04 2012, 1:39PM
“hopefully my intended link this time-
http://tinyurl.com/6h49c
:-)”
by mole10
Thursday, October 04 2012, 1:33PM
“Personally, I want to hear what everyone has to say.
Then I can take a considerd opinion on whether I agree or not and I expect you to accept that I am grown up enough to make that opinion.
You seem only willing to acknowledge (not accept) his opinion based upon whether he apologises for all criminals or not.
I find this odd and quite unacceptable.
His freedom of speech is important to me.”
by stokiemart
Thursday, October 04 2012, 1:28PM
“http://tinyurl.com/6h49c”
by stokiemart
Thursday, October 04 2012, 1:27PM
“http://tinyurl.com/6h49c”