Off-licences warned over underage sales (UPDATE)
TWO Bargain Booze off-licences were caught selling alcohol to underage customers as part of a police operation.
The stores in Middleport and Trent Vale were subject to licence reviews yesterday after a police sting to catch retailers red-handed.
-

Both have now been told to improve and warned if they breach their licences again, then they could be revoked.
Shop assistants in both stores told police they had received training about the law surrounding underage sales but they had no explanation for their failure to implement the rules.
At the store in London Road, Trent Vale, neighbourhood police carried out a test purchase in November and a 17-year-old girl bought a bottle of wine.
The sales assistant had worked in the store for four years, but did not ask the girl for ID.
Councillors heard the assistant in the Middleport store, in Newcastle Street, was the daughter of the owner.
She sold a 16-year-old two bottles of WKD. She told police she thought the customer was 17 despite knowing the legal age for buying alcohol is 18.
On that evening the same teenage volunteer took part in test purchases in 20 other premises and was refused alcohol in all of them.
Police criticised the 'poor regime of management' where the daughter of the owner was left to serve on her own with no evidence of any training.
Sergeant David Wright, of Staffordshire Police, said: "In my area of Stoke-on-Trent, Newcastle and the Staffordshire Moorlands, 42 per cent of the Bargain Booze outlets have failed a test purchase.
"That is significantly higher than any other chain we have.
"If these shops fail again we will bring them back before the committee. The sales assistant at the Trent Vale shop clearly did not grasp the concept of challenge 25. She said she thought the girl looked 20.
"It's not the first incident like this at the venue. In 2006 a sales assistant was prosecuted for making an underage sale.
"We wanted to retest it to see if standards had slipped again.
"Underage sales are a serious matter."
Conditions added to the licences at both shops include keeping a refusals book, holding regular staff training, which is formally recorded, adopting a Challenge 25 scheme and keeping CCTV footage for 31 days.
Paul Sherratt, a spokesman for Bargain Booze, said both shops are family-run businesses with experienced licence holders.
Speaking about the Trent Vale shop he said: "This sale was a genuine mistake not an example of flouting the law.
"The lady who made the sale is mortified and has handed in her notice.
"She is experienced, having previously worked in the pub trade and this demonstrates mistakes can be made.
"The book should not be thrown at retailers, they should be given an opportunity to improve.
"This standardised approach seems to mean one failure means a new list of conditions on the licence, it's a blanket policy, one size fits all."
Chairman of the licensing sub-committee, Joy Garner said: "We have permanently modified the conditions on the licences to include those agreed. Any further appearance before this committee could lead to a revocation of the licence."
Update: An article in yesterday's Sentinel reported a license review of a Bargain Booze store, in London Road, Trent Vale. The shop is actually in London Road, Oakhill.







3 Comments
by BinDiver
Tuesday, February 07 2012, 12:13PM
“Binge drinking is enough of a problem when the sale of alcohol is properly enforced. I agree with nelsonl that any shop caught selling to under-aged people should have their premises shut down because it helps to perpetuate a massive problem in our city.”
by nelsonl
Tuesday, February 07 2012, 11:33AM
“Both these shops should be closed for selling to underage people. They know the rules, also if the buyer looks young or theyre could be a possibility they are underage they should be asked for identification, if they cant provide it, they dont get served.
It works like that in the bargain booze in dresden, anyone who looks like they could be underage gets asked for ID.
Its not the first time these shops have been caught, so its obvious they arent taking things to serious, so to make an example to all other shops, get them closed.
We have enough trouble with youngsters causing disturbances without drink fuelled ones, and the shop assistant who said "well they looked about 20" should be sacked, she does not know how old the person was so she ought to of asked for ID.
What i have said might seem extreme and some might think im over reacting, but being in a position where you have had young kids of around 14-17 throw empty beer bottles at you, just for looking at them, i feel i have a right to have my say what id like to happen.
Its ok for people who havent been abused verbally or phsyically to judge or label me as a do gooder, i can take it, but what would of happened had an elderlly person crossed their paths, it could of been far worse, they would be terrified to go out in the dark again.
I hope i dont get slated for saying these shops ought to be made an example of, as im only thinking of other peoples well being and safety.”
by yesamwargames
Tuesday, February 07 2012, 11:01AM
“It's interesting to see that no names of these shop owners are given, Why? Also how often when these warnings are given it is not the shop owner that served the customers.”