Tunstall thug Martin Walton hit victim with metal chain in row over dogs
A THUG has been jailed for hitting a pedestrian with a metal dog chain before threatening him with a hammer as a child looked on.
Martin Walton launched the attack on dog-walker Morris Hill in Pinnox Street, Tunstall.
-

A dispute began when Walton's two Staffordshire bull terriers clashed with Mr Hill's dog, and the victim suffered a bite to his hand as he tried to break up the animals.
Father-of-seven Walton then struck Mr Hill across the forehead with a silver dog chain, leaving a bloody imprint of the chain's links on his skin.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
The 36-year-old then fled along with his dogs, which were not on leads, after a resident came to Mr Hill's aid.
Walton was later arrested and summoned to appear in court following the attack, which happened on September 4 last year.
However, Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard that on January 14 this year, the pair clashed again.
Walton, who was accompanying a child at the time, saw Mr Hill again walking down Pinnox Street as he drove past in his car.
Prosecutor Nicolas Berry told the court how Walton wound down the window of his car and shouted: "It's because of you I've got to go to court next week. You're dead."
When Mr Hill said he had called the police, who were on their way, Walton replied: "I'll burn your house down."
He then took out a hammer and continued to threaten Mr Hill.
Walton, of Gibson Street, Tunstall, has now been locked up for a year after being found guilty of assault occasioning actual bodily harm after a three-day trial.
The jury also found Walton guilty of intimidating a witness and being in possession of an offensive weapon.
He was acquitted of having a dog dangerously out of control after Judge Granville Styler said he could not be sure which of the dogs had bitten Mr Hill.
The judge told Walton: "It is a serious case when you intimidate someone who you know is going to be a witness against you, and intimidate him with a hammer.
"You will have to learn, as will other people in Stoke-on-Trent, that if you try to intimidate people who are going to be witnesses, there will be serious consequences."
Walton's defence barrister, David Pojar, had earlier pleaded with the judge to show leniency.
He said recovering drug addict Walton had got married just ten days before his clash with Morris, and he and his wife had a 19-month-old baby.
Mr Pojar said Walton's mother-in-law had recently been the victim of an assault, and she relied on Walton as the only qualified driver in the family.
"The two men weren't expecting to come across one another," Mr Pojar said.
"His temper got the better of him."
The barrister said Walton had been offered work, but the offer was dependent on the outcome of yesterday's court hearing.
He had also been placed on a methdone treatment programme.
Mr Pojar added: "All I can do is to invite the court to impose a sentence which is as short as possible."




Comments
by Anon_mow_cop
Thursday, August 30 2012, 10:22PM
“@dando76
How many kids has he got then ???”
by Trepit01
Thursday, August 30 2012, 9:57PM
“Dando, the scumbag attacked the middle aged guy with a weapon. I used to live on pinnox street and it happened right opposite the community college. It was an Asian neighbour that went to the victims assistance.
Your pal is going to drag his kids up with the same mentality, gangster wannabe walking round with his s***** dogs thinking he's ten men attacking a middle aged chap that was always polite and let on to his neighbours. Great attitude, which your defending. If your such a good mate, you should knock some sense into him instead.”
by damaclees
Thursday, August 30 2012, 9:25PM
“not his social worker.maybe not but your certainly stick up for him.you go on about "if it was for the years of abuse".who's fault is that,certainly not the guy he attacked.at the end of the day he attacked an innocent person,then ran off.intimidating witnesses.he got off lightly”
by dando76
Thursday, August 30 2012, 8:59PM
“keep up the stereotypes why dont you re window cleaning. you lot have read a badly written report and formed your opinions which are generally formed from the drug addict and 7 kids comments, both factually untrue along with many elements of the report. By the way i am not his social worker, just somebody whohas an interest due to family connections rather than ignorant folk who take the suns articles as gospel.”
by talk212
Thursday, August 30 2012, 8:27PM
“DJofTNE I defo think hes been watching to much TV by his behaviour ,but are you saying a worker would not behave like that,mind you he might have been at work and this horrid crime would not have taken place he also would have been scared of losing his job as window cleaner cash in hand .. TAX ---------”
by damaclees
Thursday, August 30 2012, 7:49PM
“who are you dando,his social worker”
by DJofTNE
Thursday, August 30 2012, 7:40PM
“7kids, this vermin has got 7 kids? No doubt he's never worked in his life, defo a jeremy kyle wannabee. So death threats in front of children only warrants a pawltry sentence like that? Take his kids off him now, before they start doing the same when they are older, look out another 7 kids plus their kids are heading for a life of benefits, give this vermin the chop so he cannot have any more kids asap.”
by talk212
Thursday, August 30 2012, 7:25PM
“Underclass.. There will be a lot more under David moron me think GHOST.How old was Morris it doesn't say ,and 12 months for hitting an elderly victim !!”
by dando76
Thursday, August 30 2012, 4:48PM
“Whats 7 kids got do with it? The report is full of anomalies anyway. He is no angel but definetly not what you are perceiving him to be.”
by damaclees
Thursday, August 30 2012, 4:46PM
“why should he get a short sentence.he should have thought about the concequences before the act.if he is unable to do that then he needs a longer sentence to give him time to reflect”