Tristram Hunt: The ugly, polluting plan for opencast mining in Bignall End (map)
As if the prospect of High Speed 2 scything through the county was not worry enough, the North Staffordshire countryside is facing a new threat this spring.
On the high fields of Bignall End, with Mow Cop just about visible in the distance, UK coal is planning to dig a huge new surface mine.
What is threatened at Great Oak is all part of a trend. Around the world, coal is making a come back. Of course, in China and India coal-fired power stations are still coming into production at a terrifying rate.
But Germany – for all its focus on renewable energy – remains heavily dependent on dirty brown coal. And in America, the success of shale gas (from the controversial fracking technique) means the U.S. has been able to start exporting coal to developing markets.
****Best Deals**** Van Insurance for 17-24 Yr Old Drivers - Contact Insure365 on 01782 898188 for a quotation, Free Legal Protection Included Valued at £25.00!
Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer
Contact: 01782 898188
Valid until: Tuesday, June 25 2013
In the UK we continue to rely on coal for 30 per cent of our electricity.
The tragedy is that no-one has yet cracked the question of reducing greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power stations.
Plans for so-called Carbon Capture and Storage – extracting gases from power stations and pumping them into the North Sea – have all come to nought. And global climate change is now a dangerous reality.
Now, no-one wants to see the lights go off. We need to keep a secure energy pipeline. And I am not against energy infrastructure developments – be they methane from coal beds, off-shore wind farms, nuclear waste storage, or even investigating the potential of fracking for shale gas.
What is more, in the short term, coal will have to continue to be a significant, if diminishing, part of that mix. But there is a big difference between deep pit mining, and scraping the top off 80 hectares of Bignall End.
To be fair to UK Coal, it has sought local residents' opinions and invited nearby villagers to attend public exhibitions.
But concerns remain. First of all because of the historic significance surrounding the nearby Diglake Colliery site.
It was at Bignall Hill in 1895 that 80 local men and boys lost their lives in a mining disaster. Some 40 bodies still remain trapped beneath the ground and families regard the planned mine as disrespectful.
Then there is the traffic. To get the coal out of Bignall means piling on to the narrow roads of Talke, pushing existing traffic into Chesterton, then barreling along the A500.
If you are hoping to extract 450,000 tons of coal that means a lot of big lorries on some very narrow lanes.
UK Coal suggests some 60 jobs will be created. And given the current recession, any job creation is to be welcomed. But will these be locally sourced? Will they last longer than the 15 months of the coaling period? And how many local jobs might be lost from the environmental degradation unleashed by the mining operation?
Because we should be in no doubt, this will be an ugly, polluting process. Mining is a dirty and dusty business and the digging boundary in Bignall End will go right up to an existing children's playground.
Nearby there are also areas of Special Scientific Interest, wildlife and a much loved array of flora and fauna.
And the mine will be an unavoidable eyesore, given the raised promontory it commands.
Of course, UK Coal claims the area will be returned to its pristine condition – and without any form of imported backfill.
ut there are fears the site could end up either as a landfill site or turned over for brownfield development.
However, the real threat is that this is a scoping exercise by UK Coal – and once they have started digging, a much larger application will go in to exploit the greater North Staffordshire coal bed.
Even if the Great Oak Surface Mine is indeed a time-limited, specific application, it will still mean enormous disruption and pollution for local residents.
It seems to me that if the people of Bignall End are going to take the hit for our broader energy needs, then they should be compensated. The high fields of Great Oak don't just need to be returned to their former condition, the profits of UK Coal need to go to support community infrastructure projects.
If local people are able to profit from the renaissance of King Coal, then across the country these kind of difficult planning problems might prove a lot easier to solve. Our ability to wean ourselves from an over-dependence upon fossil fuels will prove a much harder task.






6 Comments
by Whisper
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 7:46PM
“Why should we trust UK Coal, UK Surface Mining, or whatever they are calling themselves this week, to do anything to the site afterwards as they are in financial difficulty.
Only last week they asked for the government to help them with the redundancy payments for the miners who have lost their jobs with the closure of Daw Mill Colliery after the underground fire.
I would not trust a contractor close to bankruptcy to work on my property would you? So wake up Staffordshire County Council.”
by Whisper
Tuesday, March 12 2013, 7:39PM
“How can UK Coal or UK Surface Mines or whatever they are calling themselves this week be trusted to do anything to the site when they are in financial difficulty.
Only last week they asked the government for help with redundancy payments for miners losing their jobs with the closure of Daw Mill mine following the underground fire.
Would you choose a contractor to do a job on your house if you knew they were close to bankruptcy? I know I wouldn't so wake up Staffordshire County Council.”
by Emsie01
Monday, March 11 2013, 4:09PM
“I would like to raise a point with regard the constant threat of the lights going out. According to the Reuters news agency on March 6th 'Coal producers around the world face the prospect of mine closures as over supply and weak demand drive down prices towards unprofitable levels......"there's just too much coal around and too little demand" one physical coal trader said'. Coal fired power stations are closing down, there is no real need for this, UK Coal simply want profit, please stop hiding behind the keeping the bills down argument. Personally I don't care what constituency an MP comes from, as a campaigner against the mine I appreciate help from wherever it comes, I didn't read the article as pro UK Coal, Mr Hunt seems against it, he is making the point that IF it goes ahead then the local people should be compensated.”
by DawnDo
Monday, March 11 2013, 1:08PM
“'To be fair to UK Coal, it has sought local residents' opinions and invited nearby villagers to attend public exhibitions.'
That is NOT true. UK Coal had 4 exhibits. One of which had to be requested by locals and which was available to visit between 2pm and 5pm, and which was AFTER the closing date of the Scoping Proposal allowing for comments.
In addition UK Coal did not want residents opinions, they tolerated them. Some UK Coal representative were not forth coming with information. Some UK Coal representatives gave one answer to a question and another gave a different answer. Was this a ploy to try to confuse I wonder?
'Of course, UK Coal claims the area will be returned to its pristine condition – and without any form of imported backfill.'
This again is NOT true. UK Coal claim they will return it to the original landscape but how can they? They are extracting 450,000 tonnes of coal, that will leave a void, that void needs to be filled in order for the level of the landscape to be maintained.
In addition once you have put a spade in the soil you have changed its ecology, taking the soil, banking it up, and leaving it to lie dormant for so very very long destroys all the organisms in the soil, and no amount of 'feeding' it afterwards will put back what has been lost.
'It seems to me that if the people of Bignall End are going to take the hit for our broader energy needs, then they should be compensated. '
There is NO amount of compensation which will recompense anyone for the devastion they want to do. The only thing that UK Coal can do, as for as I am concerned, IS TO STOP WHAT YOU ARE DOING, PACK UP AND SHIP OUT. WE DO NOT WANT YOU ANYWHERE NEAR US, OUR HOMES, OUR WILDLIFE OR OUR LAND.”
by chansbury
Monday, March 11 2013, 12:15PM
“There are 77 plus men and boys under there too, not 40-and Uk Coal have advertised as supplying only 5% not 30% of energy, so two big factors not researched enough by Tristam Hunt in my personal opinion. terrible mistakes to make in the media that can sabotage support we already have...other than it was just about tolerable as an article, but based PURELY on his opinion and not FACTS, lets not forget. I would to know what he plans to actively DO about it. I certainly wouldnt be putting him on our mailing list just yet, unlike some other MPs and political parties more than happy to offer help.
Claire Hansbury, Chair of Camapaign Against Great Oak Opencast”
by strandedhere
Monday, March 11 2013, 9:17AM
“I read this as "the ugly,polluting Tristram Hunt",but maybe I'm prejudiced,having met the man!”