Tristram Hunt: How Second City rivalry can be exploited for our benefit

Trusted article source icon
Monday, September 24, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

' WHAT makes us Brummie?' was the tricky question posed last week by Birmingham City Council. Led by local councillor Waseem Zaffar, the investigation was an attempt to discover what gives a city and her people a collective identity.

It is an intriguing exercise, with some serious implications for us in Stoke.

  1. Tristram Hunt

    The Bull Ring in Birmingham.

At the heart of the inquiry is an ongoing crisis about Birmingham's place as Britain's Second City. Councillors and Brummie businessmen have watched with concern the remarkable revival of Manchester over the past 20 years. Under the inspired leadership of the two knights – chief executive Sir Howard Bernstein and council leader Sir Richard Leese – the city has turned around its economic fortunes and re-populated the urban centre (although last week's murder of two brave policewomen was a reminder of the ugly past).

Such has been the tension over Second City status – and the struggle over Government funds, sporting events and cultural festivals that comes with it – Birmingham and Manchester signed an informal 'peace treaty' earlier this year in order to end the rivalry. Few think it will last.

Panasonic Store Camera•20x Optical Zoom LEICA DC Lens from 24mm...

Hylands Ltd & Panasonic Store

View details

Print voucher

What Digital camera Gold award winning DMCTZ40
SAVE £20 off our store price ONLY with this voucher
Plus you can also claim a SD card or spare battery
Choice of colours, free parking behind store

Terms: Print this voucher and hand in at Panasonic Store Hanley to save £20 off our store price ONLY £269.90

Contact: 01782 342609

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

Of course, such rivalry is nothing new. In their Victorian hey-day, the two cities battled it out against each other. Manchester modelled itself as the 'Florence of the North' with an architecture which directly imitated the great Italian city state. Just look at those wonderful warehouses along Portland Street, or the Manchester City Art Gallery which recalls the palazzo style of Tuscany. All of this was testimony to the trading, mercantile spirit of 'Cottonopolis.'

Birmingham, by contrast, chose Venice for its inspiration – not least, because of the city's waterways. So-called Venetian Gothic architecture was the style for the city's buildings, and with the Big Brum tower behind the Council House a direct replica of the campanile of St. Mark's in Venice.

The city mayor during the 1870s, Joseph Chamberlain, was unashamed in championing his metal-bashing city. When it came to the British economy, empire and global exports, Birmingham was convinced she was the Second City.

But what of today? As Sion Simon, a former MP in the city put it to the committee: 'People the world over know what Liverpool is – the city with a world famous football team and the Beatles – but Birmingham does not have such a reputation." He told the inquiry that this was because the distinctive Brummie characteristics were a unique "self-deprecating and dry sense of humour" and an inability to boast, something which, he argued, made selling the city difficult and that could not be said of 'Scousers' or 'Mancs'.

I am not sure how true that is, but I do know that part of the recent success of Manchester has been down to its own investigation of its contemporary identity. Led by the designer Peter Saville, the city thought very hard about its unique attributes and what its selling point could be in the 21st century. The strap-line it came up with was 'The Original, Modern City' – a piece of branding which drew upon its remarkable history of the industrial revolution, but also its modern capacity for innovation. It was a call to arms as much as a description of the city.

Birmingham needs to do something similar. Yet it is a bigger city with a more diffuse racial and ethnic make-up, and might well find it harder to identify its precise function.

So, what is Stoke-on-Trent's role in this? Personally, I don't think we need a grand inquiry into the nature of our Potteries identity. Of course, in order to exploit your attributes you need to be clear about who you are; but, a public inquiry into re-imagining our identity can come a bit later. At the moment, we have enough on our plate in generating jobs, improving schools, getting the infrastructure right, and promoting a positive image to outside investors.

The real question is who do we back – Manchester or Birmingham? The recession has not been kind to either city but before the crash both ranked in the top hundred cities in the world in terms of economic output. And we have them on our doorstep. We should back both: a vibrant Manchester and Birmingham is in our civic interest – as long as we have the transport provision, supply chains, and political contacts to exploit our proximity.

Let's hope the people of Birmingham find their answer, but we should be clear about what we're about: ensuring two prosperous Second Cities boost the prospects of Stoke-on-Trent.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for gormhenghast

    by gormhenghast

    Thursday, September 27 2012, 10:32PM

    “A councillor of Pakistani origins asks what makes Birmingham brummie, well he`ll never know it already resemble Mumbai or Calcutta as it should be, the brummies have gone away, and here we have Tristram asking what makes Stoke, well Triss thankfully you`ll never know, stop being so daft and join van der Laughing Stock back in the deep South from whence you came, go fight for a political seatand stop being the organ grinders monkey, you remind me of one of those tin monkeys the rich kids got at christmas, stick a penny in its gob and away it went banging symbols like a Presbyterian minister on LSD.”

  • Profile image for Mr_Jingles

    by Mr_Jingles

    Tuesday, September 25 2012, 7:20PM

    “@Mole 10
    I concur with your views.

    I expect our forefathers are turning in their graves.

    The leaders of this great city have no understanding, no interest with the real needs of its people, otherwise things would be done totally different.

    The past councillors of this great city of ours were once astute businessmen, the owners of pottery and pits who had a love and vision for the city. They did not do it for a wage, reward or self-importance, they did it because they were local people and they cared. They knew what was needed and how a business/council should be run.

    Sadly this lot we have now haven't got a clue. How many of them are local entrepreneurs and want to serve our City for free – none of them.

    People who are not of local blood do not understand what makes Stoke on Trent a special place like no other city in the UK, our cultural, differences, wants and needs.

    For once let's have a politician who is local, has understanding, passion and determined to do the right thing making a difference for us all.”

  • Profile image for mole10

    by mole10

    Tuesday, September 25 2012, 9:39AM

    “Tristram doesn't actually quite get it you see, but for that matter, neither do the usurpers whom have been implanted into this Labour Council from afar.

    My point below wrote of yet another implant put in to steer Meredith through his early years and with an agenda.

    I'm not wrong and I'm very accurate and very factual.

    Proper Labour Councils from before fought long and hard for a unitary status to cede from Staffs County council.

    What we have seen since very soon after that point is every opportunity to frustrate that goal and extreme incompetence by this or that new grouping to promote it.

    Every current strategy is to hope that something beyond works to our benefit and is based on the false no hoper of 'mutual benefeit'.

    They don't have our blood but they spoonfeed us deafeat after defeat and blame all critics around them as being negative.

    The truth is that you are implants, you have no real understanding of our history and you honestly believe that your good itentions (failure in everything but taking our cash) will somehow come through in the end.

    Unitary authority, first, second and last for a City full of people who want success regardless of what Manchester or others achieve for themselves.

    How many of our MPs and Councillors are potters?
    Yes it does matter and it matters because what we have is the alternative and the alternative is the laughing stock of Great Britain that fails day in, day out.”

  • Profile image for papalazaroo

    by papalazaroo

    Tuesday, September 25 2012, 6:29AM

    “I always come away from one of Tristram Hunt MP's articles feeling a mixture of bafflement and annoyance, We pay you to meaningfully represent the people of this city not to write inane articles in the paper alongside a photo of yourself looking pensive, and pay us lip service. In case you or one of your acquaintances do read this please note that you need to start doing something that's helpful to the people of this city otherwise you're going to become a laughing stock (the kernel is there already). A prosperous Birmingham and Manchester will help Stoke-on-Trent you say. How? You don't explain the argument behind your theory. You could argue the alternative argument that a less prosperous Birmingham or Manchester could be good for Stoke-on-Trent. Regardless of your view you should explain it for the benefit of the people you represent. And if you don't you should be kicked off the paper because they have an obligation to provide a correct service to the community they serve too. No imagination looking forward, no solutions for our city, And beginning to sound like he'd like to be somewhere else.”

  • Profile image for truestokie

    by truestokie

    Monday, September 24 2012, 9:11PM

    “Who let this moron out again to witter on about two cities with the afterthought (Stoke) stuck in the middle.
    He is typical shunted in Labour.
    Know's nowt about the folk or our traditions but what he was programmed with in Birmingham.
    Hunt nobody I know is interested in the slightest about Manchester, or Birmingham, (and after 13 years of your bloody lot) not much in your lot.
    The three stooges did nothing.”

  • Profile image for Dizzy1960

    by Dizzy1960

    Monday, September 24 2012, 5:50PM

    “So what gave us Royal and Ecclesiastical recognition and therefore, worthy of "City Status"?

    Not going to hold my breathe for an answer from our so called historical know it all. Because I don't think he's got the gumption to give it to us straight.

    And we voted this bloke in to hopefully give this city some identity? What a waste of a vote.”

  • Profile image for Redtone

    by Redtone

    Monday, September 24 2012, 4:35PM

    “More garbage from Mr Hunt (I've given up on what his first name actually is).

    He seems far more comfortable wittering on about Birmingham and Manchester, with Stoke tacked on to the end - almost as if in panic because we'd completely slipped his mind.

    Brilliant observation that we're bang in the middle of the two... I'm sure you could find another safe Labour seat in either!”

  • Profile image for mole10

    by mole10

    Monday, September 24 2012, 4:29PM

    “The question is real enough but becomes flawed when we find the Stoke Labour Party being administered from a West Midlands office near Birmingham.

    Does this matter?
    Yep.
    Meredith had a lackey implanted into his office with a clear set of instructions on how to proceed.

    Manchester comes nowhere into the equation but my guess is that most local political thinkers will sway towards the North and not the South with most others thinking similar.

    Put this question onto the streets to find a bigger opinion.
    My view is 90% North with very little connections to Birmingham with the cut off point being somwhere below Stafford Town.”

  • Profile image for Milton_Keanes

    by Milton_Keanes

    Monday, September 24 2012, 3:40PM

    “To quote The Hon. Tristram:

    "...with some serious implications for us in Stoke."

    or

    "I don't think we need a grand inquiry into the nature of our Potteries identity."

    er, I don't think you are generally regarded around here as being as being one of "us" or that you are qualified to use the inclusive phrase "...our Potteries identity".

    You were parachuted into a safe seat as a Labour Party minor royal. Let's hope you are soon airlifted out as a political casualty.”

  • Profile image for rubythursday

    by rubythursday

    Monday, September 24 2012, 2:40PM

    “"Let's hope the people of Birmingham find their answer, but we should be clear about what we're about: ensuring two prosperous Second Cities boost the prospects of Stoke-on-Trent"

    we are certainly very well placed, geographically......so what's the plan?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article