Theme park noise battle is reignited
A COUPLE are set to take on Alton Towers at the High Court in a legal fight which could ultimately force the theme park to relocate or shut some rides.
Stephen and Suzanne Roper have waged a legal battle against the theme park for a decade.
Now they have won the right to a full High Court trial during which the amount of noise generated by the park will be investigated.
The couple, who have lived just 100 yards away from the park entrance at Farley since 1968, say their lives have been made a misery by noise from the rides and screams from thrill-seekers as well as fireworks and music.
Fixed fee sales package for any residential property, just £325 +vat. Includes listing on all major portals e.g. Rightmove & Zoopla, floorplans, photos, for sale board, etc. Call for more details.
Terms: All prices subject to VAT. Terms and Conditions apply. E&OE.
Contact: 01782 900100
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
They first launched their legal fight in 2002, but after years of wrangling, their claim for an injunction and damages was thrown out in January 2011.
Judge Mr Justice Hickinbottom later overturned that decision, bringing the claim back to life.
Alton Towers owner, the Tussauds Group, then sought permission to appeal that ruling, but yesterday, Lord Justice Laws ruled that there was no reasonable prospect of success, and refused permission for the appeal.
The judge also ordered the Tussauds Group to pay the Ropers £8,500 in legal costs in respect of yesterday's hearing.
The decision now paves the way for a full court hearing. The Ropers will seek an injunction forcing the park owners to close or relocate some rides and an order forcing them to pay damages for noise suffered from 1998 to the present.
Speaking after the latest hearing, the couple's solicitor, Richard Buxton, said: "We are pleased that the trial can now proceed. Now we can stop worrying about court procedure."
On reviving the couple's claim, High Court judge Mr Justice Hickinbottom said that he did so 'with a heavy heart' because the cost of proceedings could lead to 'grave financial difficulties for the claimants', if they are unsuccessful.
In July last year, the couple were refused a protective costs order – which would effectively limit their potential liability to pay Tussaud's legal costs if they lose.
Judge Mr Justice Burnett found that they have an income of £200,000 a year, own three mortgage-free properties and are, "by any standard rich".
Mr Roper is a former chairman and shareholder of Churchill China, who retired in May, 2007. Neighbours of the company's Sandyford factory have for years complained about noise from the site.
Stella Heritage, of Castle Hill Road, Alton, said: "I don't suppose anyone expected Alton Towers would grow as big as it has, or to become as noisy as it is.
"But it is a theme park. We can hear the noise of people screaming where we are, especially if you are out in the garden, but I can't honestly say it bothers us.
"Traffic on the other hand is a huge problem."
A spokesman for Alton Towers said: "We are disappointed with the judgment and we will continue to defend our position.
"We've been part of the community for over 200 years and we have always sought to be a responsible and co-operative neighbour. We will continue to work closely with our neighbours, the vast majority of whom recognise the valuable contribution we make to the community and are very supportive."




Comments
by mruseruk
Saturday, June 16 2012, 10:38AM
“What a pair of idiots. They don't even live there all the time they just want to feel important and try and take on a large excellent succesfull park...
Anyway name and shame here are some details....
http://tinyurl.com/827uwvw
enjoy...!”
by goosehole
Friday, May 18 2012, 3:46AM
“Can't thy go and live in one of their other houses instead? ******* *****s.”
by Wozzer101
Monday, May 07 2012, 5:02AM
“That house and land given it's placement to at the endurance to a very large theam park, but NOT effected by noise would command a very high price, and I would think there would be a long line of people willing to pay to. A child's dream.”
by Jayb007
Monday, May 07 2012, 4:34AM
“Alton Towers has been a theme park for at least 40 years, Stephen Roper if you didn't want the noise move, I'm sure with you big retirement package from Churchill you can move somewhere quieter perhaps the highlands would be good place, far away as possible!! The biggest attraction in Staffordshire and he wants to close it, idiot!”
by Coasterbuff
Sunday, May 06 2012, 1:12PM
“@mrdoulton,
Mr Roper isn't anything to do with Churchill China anymore, he retired 2 years ago.”
by mrdoulton
Sunday, May 06 2012, 6:53AM
“this is just like janudince v janudince..... only person getting rich is the lawyers.
Churchill pottery make loads of wonga so move man move if u so unhappy”
by mrdoulton
Sunday, May 06 2012, 6:51AM
“Mr Roper Buy an IPOD get over it. Iam sure the pottery firm you own can run to one.”
by toria2010
Saturday, May 05 2012, 11:37PM
“for god sake people stop complaining about a bit of noise its somewhere for people to go for a fun day out with their friends and families and there isnt much to do as it is and if its that bad then go live somewhere else instead of wrecking a good thing.”
by focusboy
Saturday, May 05 2012, 8:20PM
“A bit of advice to Mr. Roper:
Just suck it up and live with it!
(You may remember that's what you said to the people of Sandyford when they objected to your factory expansion)”
by scfcscfc08
Saturday, May 05 2012, 7:59AM
“Whatever views people have on situations such as this, one thing that should raise the eyebrows of everyone though, is the cost of going to law in this country.
I can envisage sums which I and the majority making comment here would have to spend everything that they earned in not one but multiple lifetimes and all for a simple decision. How can spending so much ensure a better decision than a dozen or so people being charged with making that decision over a few pints in the boozer on one night?
What do the legal eagles actually do for all that money? I can't imagine them searching, searching, researching, researching to get a right answer, when in truth there isn't one.”