BREAKING NEWS
 

Taxpayers pick up £26k bill for coffee at Stoke-on-Trent City Council

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, September 04, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

COFFEES, teas and hot chocolates for officers and their visitors cost a cash-strapped council £26,000 in one year as the authority made cuts of £35.6 million.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council racked up the bill providing hot refreshments for officers and their guests at meetings throughout the 2011-12 financial year, which was dubbed the 'toughest in living memory' by leaders due to the scale of budget cuts needed.

  1. 3971389.png

The authority has axed its subsidy for a drinks machine in the members' lounge after the authority's 44 councillors guzzled 10,800 free hot drinks in a year.

But figures show it spent £25,929 – about £500 a week – providing refreshments at private meetings.

SPRAY TAN- £17 OR 2 FOR £25.50 !!!

Keido Hair & Beauty Ltd

View details

Print voucher

GET READY FOR SUMMER WITH A GOLDEN SPRAY TAN .
WHETHER YOU WANT A NATURAL GLOW OR A DEEP BRONZE, COME AND GET YOUR TAN AT KEIDO HAIR AND BEAUTY.
£17 OR 2 FOR £25.50

Terms: QUOTE SPRAY TAN WEB OFFER WHEN BOOKING IN

Contact: 01782 917918

Valid until: Saturday, August 31 2013

The total was amassed through paying for refill sachets for several deluxe machines which were provided by an outside company.

Chief executive John van de Laarschot and leader Mohammed Pervez both have access to a machine close to their offices.

The authority said it only provided refreshments when visitors were present and the meeting was scheduled to last longer than 90 minutes.

Councillor Dave Conway, leader of the opposition City Independents group, said: "To be spending £500 a week on teas and coffees is shocking. It is a colossal amount of money.

"I'd like to know the name of this coffee so I can tell my wife not to buy any.

"I can't understand how that much can be spent on drinks. They can't have that many meetings in a week.

"I sat in a licensing meeting which went on for more than two hours not long ago and I had a glass of water."

The coffee machine in the councillors' lounge was also provided free by an outside firm but the council was spending more than £3,400 a year to pay for an average of 900 drinks every month.

Councillors are now charged 40p for each cup.

The annual coffee bill outstrips the £17,500 annual subsidy paid to Norton Community Hall, which is one of a number fighting against the threat of closure under council cutbacks.

Centre management committee vice-chairman Mick Salih, of Norton, said: "It's scandalous that the money can be found for something like this but, when we talk to them about subsidy, they come up with every excuse under the sun.

"As volunteers at community halls, we are more than prepared to give up our time to run these facilities. So are these well-paid officers prepared to give up their coffee machines?"

Council and Labour group leader Mohammed Pervez said: "The city council provides refreshments to officers at meetings scheduled to last over 90 minutes and when visitors are present in meetings.

"The chief executive pays personally for any refreshments taken when the above criteria is not met, including any drinks consumed from a machine which is located in the vicinity of his office.

"A drinks machine is located in the office of the leader but it is not possible to provide an individual breakdown of the cost of this machine alone.

"The equipment used is both free on loan and outright purchased. There was no equipment cost in 2011-12."

Robert Oxley, campaign manager at lobbying group the TaxPayers' Alliance said: "It is astonishing how much money officers are spending on fancy coffees.

"Councillors have rightly ditched their perks, so it really takes the biscuit for town hall bureaucrats to keep theirs.

"This expenditure appears terrible value for money and will raise serious questions about the ability of those same officers to help deliver best value in other areas of council spending."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for FredBear

    by FredBear

    Wednesday, September 05 2012, 10:52PM

    “Oh my days, the Sentinel strike with another red hot story to rile the masses with about 20% of the whole story.

    Fact is, anyone in the council looking at a coffee bill would make this cut, but any cursory check would show it's probably spread across god knows how many council owned offices,venues and meeting rooms. It will be accounted for under a code which also covers tea urns and kettles and other miscellaneous bits and bobs and is then added up for the whole council and presented in a summary of spend that the Sentinel get's their grubby little hands on looking for things they can spin out as political injustices.

    I don't work for the council, I'm not opposed to criticising the council when it's due, but your paper is a disgrace at feeding negativity in this City and is a major part of the problem, not solution.

    shame”

  • Profile image for Pantofola

    by Pantofola

    Wednesday, September 05 2012, 9:13PM

    “You honestly couldnt make it up could you.

    That money could have been spent maybe keeping shelton pool open for the disabled.

    The more I read about this corrupt lot of pen pushers the angrier I get.”

  • Profile image for Robnoxious

    by Robnoxious

    Wednesday, September 05 2012, 5:05PM

    “I've just looked at the post comments on the Which and the Wardrobe story.Which as in,belonging to him and in the way to solve it,do we legalize it ? It sounded like a powder keg was about to go off,excuse the pun.I was being convinced by one of the pro/legalize brigade that it would be a good thing to do, to make it legal.Then another one came on and started ranting on about red arrows,i did not know wether someone had shot him or he was talking about the aeroplanes.in any event they made right display of themselves.QUOTE-End the red arrows,i'm sick of morons telling me I'm wrong,without actually telling me i'm wrong.redsomething his name, and to be honest can't be bothered to look.Same old we are not a threat to society, well if you don't mind being robbed mugged and violently threatened that go hand in hand with these activities,so be it.There are no words to describe these people,which in turn begs the question,why would anyone want dialog with them. they thrive on your comments ,which in turn bring out the worst in human character. They will never get the zombie state they are after.Once an addict always an addict and an exaddict, just one step away.So i have taken my brown powder and smelled the coffee, just as i was being convinced. I would like to withdraw my proposals from my previous post DEAL OR NO STEAL. Sorry Mr Conway ,but i knew you were the only person i could rely on to tell them '' ;;;;;;;;;; OFF”

  • Profile image for stokemaveric

    by stokemaveric

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 8:53PM

    “they spend this obscene amount on beverages for themselves yet they cant even cut the grass at local cemetaries,keep much needed centers open close libaries and cut funding to the needy..this lot should hang their heads in shame...”

  • Profile image for Robnoxious

    by Robnoxious

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 5:47PM

    “Yip, dump the coffee.and the rest of it. Save yourselves loads of money.By the popular opinion of the legalize cannabis campaign we suggest,not to a vote, we are telling you,start taking cans of bis and cut the grass to get some weed, it's all self financing. Recycle your cans,sell your grass and weed, should you still need a drink , coke will do it.Come on councillors stop being dopes and do something white for once in your life.You will save money in your social services budget by us robbing and frightening to death the vulnerable and elderly. You will save money by not having to build more prisons for all the crime we are committing when we need our next fix. I see this as a win win situation and to top it all you will save money on the OAP bus fare they will be to scared go through the door just in case we see them.The big earner is to charge people £5 for using your toilet , it may sound a bit hit, but when you are powdering your nose ? So come on Mr Conway say what you think.Good idea or what. I cant hear you.If you need any more persuading, we love taking away from charities.”

  • Profile image for Jolyteddy

    by Jolyteddy

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 1:43PM

    “How on earth did they manage to spend so much on drinks ? Providing for more than a couple of people should prove cheaper, as they could use wholesale sizes.

    Everyone else has to pay for workplace refreshments, so why should we provide freebies for these parasites ?

    Another freebie (still current ?) was the paying of all a councillor's phone bill; not just for council business calls.”

  • Profile image for maggoo1967

    by maggoo1967

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 1:01PM

    “PotteriesEYE investigated and broke the story of £26,000 being spent on free coffee and tea for senior councillors and senior officers at Stoke-on-Trent City Council.
    The Sentinel reports it today, as an aside, thanks Sentinel for giving credit to us community volunteers so that you can make money out of the news we researched and broke. So much for journalistic ethics eh?
    Our original story: null
    Back to the coffee.
    In the grand scheme of things this may seem at first glance a drop in the ocean, especially when you consider the £24m they need to find again this year for cuts, as well as the £59m they want to borrow for the new council HGQ, oh and don't forget the £4m overspend from last years cuts.
    Indeed, I agree it is small in terms of cash. However, if you look beyond the cash itself and look deeper, the issue drives right to the very heart of the problems councillors and the public face in democratic terms.
    I have absolutely no doubt at all that until we broke this story, no councillor, from any political party had any idea of this £26,000 bill for officer refreshments.
    The problem with council spending, and in particular budget cuts is that councillors only receive a list of what officers want them to cut, not a list of all spending.
    I have written about this before – 15 years ago at budget time all councillors got a budget book. It was a very thick line by line detailed account of all spending in the council. It was a hard slog to read it but at least when an officer said they wanted to cut something, councillors could say no I want to cut this or that.
    Not anymore.
    All they get is a list of the proposed cuts and the broad headline amounts for each departmental spend. What happens then? Well some bright spark will challenge any councillor to find alternative cuts if they oppose any that the officers have put forward. How on earth can you find alternatives without being given a list of what those alternatives are?
    This refreshment issue is a good example. Would councillors have chosen this as a cut rather than something else if they had been given the choice? Of course they would, but they weren't given the choice by officers.
    It beggars the question of how much can you trust officers. If officers are prepared to cuts bus passes for the blind and elderly whilst hiding their own free coffee perks – just for a free coffee! – what else are they prepared to protect in their own interests?
    It is time to wake up councillors. It's time for all councillors to demand a full budget book of spend so that those democratically elected to represent the people can make decisions in the budget based on all the information and not just that which has been filter by greedy and self interested officers.
    Councillors, you deserve better, but its up to you – and the public certainly deserve their money being spent on the services they need, not on the petty perks of highly paid officers.”

  • Profile image for britpark

    by britpark

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 12:06PM

    “£25,000 would have cut a several acres of grass!”

  • Profile image for strandedhere

    by strandedhere

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 10:29AM

    “And yet you'll notice that council-run Family Support Centres exchanged their "I'll make you a cuppa Duck" system for a pay-as-you-drink machine.The good old Labour double-standard,again.”

  • Profile image for daley74

    by daley74

    Tuesday, September 04 2012, 9:50AM

    “"I sat in a licensing meeting which went on for more than two hours not long ago and I had a glass of water."

    Perhaps Councillor Conway's mother slept with a camel!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article