Stoke City: Sunderland boss O'Neill says Huth had to go ... but backs Pulis over play-acting

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, February 08, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

MARTIN O'Neill has quickly stamped on any talk of a rift with Stoke City boss Tony Pulis in the aftermath of Robert Huth's controversial sending-off during Saturday's defeat to Sunderland.

The two managers are at odds over the reaction of Sunderland midfielder David Meyler after his collision with Huth during the first half at the Britannia Stadium.

Pulis immediately rounded on Meyler, accusing him of over-reacting to get Huth dismissed.

O'Neill sprang to the defence of the 22-year-old Irishman yesterday, but still appeared to be in a conciliatory mood by stating: "I was talking to Tony afterwards and I knew what he was going to do. That's fine, that's totally his prerogative.

"But in this instance I will stick up for my player.

"If I thought any of my own players were out of order, I would like to think I would be able to come here and honestly give that assessment, but not in this case."

O'Neill, pictured below, maintains that referee Martin Atkinson was right to show Huth a red card after seeing a replay of his challenge, describing it as reckless.

"I hadn't had a chance to see the incident until Sunday," he explained. "I saw it and I still have exactly the same opinion. It's a reckless challenge.

"It's one that the referee sees very, very quickly and his opinion of it was my opinion at the time, that it was a red card.

"Now obviously, you can see he [Huth] has attempted to pull out at the end, but that's something the referee can't see in a split second, and he still catches Meyler, and Meyler on the way down has hurt himself.

"This idea that Meyler feigned an injury – I'm sorry, I know David and he's as brave as they come. He has had two horrendous injuries he is just recovering from, so from that viewpoint I think Tony is wrong."

City said footage and photographic evidence proved Meyler actually kicked Huth in the follow-through from his clearance.

But their appeal against the dismissal was rejected by an FA disciplinary panel yesterday, which means Huth will be banned for three games.

O'Neill agrees with Pulis's wider argument, meanwhile, that there is too much play-acting in the modern game aimed at getting fellow professionals punished.

The Stoke boss has called on players' union chief Gordon Taylor to take a lead by speaking directly to his members.

And O'Neill said: "I understand what Tony was saying from a general viewpoint because players do have a responsibility to try to keep fellow players on the field of play.

"Players have a responsibility themselves to stop play-acting. I totally agree with that point, but not in this case with David Meyler."

More Stoke City articles:

Stoke City: Coates sees red as Huth appeal is dismissed

Stoke City: Shanghai surprise as Upson is linked with China switch

Martin Smith: The signs aren't good, but we can turn fortunes around

Stoke City: Sending off wrecks City's youth cup hopes

5
Tweet this article
Report

5 Comments

  • Profile image for stonemel

    by stonemel

    Wednesday, February 08 2012, 5:44PM

    “Don't get me wrong because I would not have sent Huth off. If he had led with his feet then it would have been extremely dangerous. In the event he did not catch the Sunderland player. It was infact the other way round and this could have realistically hurt the player to stay down.
    I do think it was a ridiculous tackle for a center half to be making so far from a danger area and as Huth is a big man I can only think that the FA consider it still a dangerous and poor tackle as contact, even with those knees could have caused serious damage to a player.”

  • Profile image for Hadis53

    by Hadis53

    Wednesday, February 08 2012, 2:24PM

    “This is extremely disappointing. Martin O'Neil usually comes across as not just a great manager but a wonderful, fair-minded sportsman. That he is sticking to this line after watching replays of the incident saddens me, and might lead to me losing some respect for him. His reaction is a common one amongst parents of naughty schoolchildren: "Other people's children can be very naughty, but not my little angel."”

  • Profile image for soccerfoot11

    by soccerfoot11

    Wednesday, February 08 2012, 1:46PM

    “2 good comments which i totally agree with”

  • Profile image for STHolder

    by STHolder

    Wednesday, February 08 2012, 10:50AM

    “Funny how the only professional football man Ive heard say it was the right decision is the Sunderland manager. That includes the anti-Stoke MOTD panel. Meyler's reaction was pathetic and I know he won't care any less as he conned the 3 points for the Mackems, but the continual play acting (which includes players feigning injusy when the opposing team is in posession - leading them to kick the ball into touch) is rapidly leading to me falling severly out of love with the game. It should be renamed "cheat-ball" or "fairy-ball". One things for sure, its not to "man's game" it used to be. Most players no longer have the pride & self-respect NOT to roll around (Wilko is the example to follow) and "good honest pro's" no longer exist. Its now just about the next pay check and what car they drive. Completely disillusioned.”

  • Profile image for bexhillpotter

    by bexhillpotter

    Wednesday, February 08 2012, 10:31AM

    “It was a yellow card offence only and Huth should not be serving a three match ban. Pulis is right in highlighting the play acting that is creeping in to the game, thanks to Spanish and other foreign players acting as if they have been poleaxed at the slightest touch!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters