Sex offenders face lie-detector tests

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Profile image for This is Staffordshire

This is Staffordshire

PAEDOPHILES and rapists in Staffordshire are having to take lie-detector tests in a bid to stop them re-offending.

They must take regular tests as a condition of their release from prison and could be sent back to custody if they refuse as a breach of parole.

Staffordshire Probation Service is one of nine areas taking part in a new three-year trial of polygraph sessions on sex offenders.

It comes as figures released yesterday showed 694 registered sex offenders were living in Staffordshire on March 31 – two fewer than the previous year.

Of these, 233 were living in Stoke-on-Trent, 119 in the North Staffordshire division, which covers Newcastle borough and the Moorlands, and 186 in Chase division, which includes Stone and Stafford.

Twenty of the most dangerous sex offenders are currently subject to the lie-detector tests.

Barbara Jones, head of Stoke-on-Trent Probation Delivery Unit, said: "The purpose of the polygraph is to help us better manage the risk from certain sex offenders who are being supervised.

"Offenders are regularly asked questions about their behaviour in the community. Which offenders are chosen and the frequency of the tests depends on the circumstances of their offending and level of risk.

"They know their responses are going to be checked so it helps people to be more open about what's going on."

Each polygraph session has three phases and lasts about 90 minutes. It starts with a pre-test interview when the offender is told what questions they will be asked, which can prompt an admission in itself. The offender is then attached to the lie-detector, which monitors heart rate, sweating, brain activity and blood pressure while the questions are asked.

The operator interprets the responses, before the paedophile is asked to account for any failures.

The results cannot be used in court, but are aimed at cutting further offending and encouraging offenders to make admissions. If successful, the tests could become mandatory for all sex offenders across the country.

Marie Mitchell, pictured, chairman of Fegg Hayes Residents' Association, today welcomed the move. She said: "If sex offenders are going to be released into the community and they could be a risk to the public, then it's a good idea."

But Dr Helen Jones, criminologist at Manchester Metropolitan University, questioned how effective the tactic would be. She said: "It could be useful, but it depends what questions are asked and what resources the probation service and police have to investigate tests that show there could be some illegal activity going on.

"The results of polygraph tests are not 100 per cent guaranteed, otherwise we'd be using them to investigate a whole range of crimes."

15
Tweet this article
Report

15 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by L.J., Hartshill

    Wednesday, October 28 2009, 10:41AM

    “I sort of agree Sharon, but I can't blame the Sentinel for reporting it (although I do think the language is deliberately designed to provoke and mislead).

    You're right anyway. While I think all child abuse is abhorrent, the idea that a polygraphy test is going to detect or prevent offending against children is ludicrous for the reasons outlined earlier. If we're going to go down the "well if it protects just one small child" route then why not just subject all parents and immediate relatives of children to a polygraph test? As they are statistically far more likely to abuse children than a complete stranger, this is surely going to protect a hell of a lot more children?

    Even though, um it won't, because polygraph tests are unreliable and prove nothing.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Sharon Lloyd, Oak Hill

    Wednesday, October 28 2009, 7:50AM

    “Seems the Sentinel is even more desperate than its parent company, The Daily Mail, to provoke the mass idiots of Stoke. Anyone who spends 5 minutes on the actually subject would know that more than 90 per cent of child abusers are the actual parents of the children, but hey, that points the finger at us all so isnt any fun is it. Never mind the facts - wind up the idiots”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by P, STOKE

    Wednesday, October 28 2009, 12:45AM

    “What about a marriage?
    Can they wed??”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by L.J., Hartshill

    Wednesday, October 28 2009, 12:32AM

    “The article clearly points out that lie detector tests are already being done on the most dangerous sex offenders, which one would assume includes those who pose a threat to children.

    Therefore, I don't see how extending it to all sex offenders (ie. those who have neither committed crimes against children, nor pose a threat to them) validates the "well if it projects just one child" argument. It's illogical. Probably because it's a knee-jerk reaction to a story that used the words "perverts" and "paedos".

    But these are all negative comments, and people are never happy with anything right? Just say what you mean: 1) How dare people have an opposing viewpoint. 2) How dare people criticise how their (public) money is being spent. 3) How dare people draw attention to the unreliability of polygraph tests.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by anon, stoke

    Tuesday, October 27 2009, 9:48PM

    “Raymond....you have me wrong...i agree with everything you say but in the reality we are living in where these monsters seem to have more rights than the victims wehave to take whatever we can get and if lie detectors help then im all for them. Believe me, i know something about being the victim of sexual assault so i have very strong views on this...if it were up to me every victim would be given the right to inflict as much pain on their attacker as they recieved themselves, sadly this wont ever happen so anything that an help deter this monsters im happy to support.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters