Revealed...Why council agreed Tesco booze deal in secret

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Profile image for This is Staffordshire

This is Staffordshire

THE reason members of the public were barred from a council meeting was to protect the identity of a secret shopper used in a Trading Standards sting to test policy on preventing underage alcohol sales, The Sentinel can reveal.

On Monday Tesco was granted permission to sell alcohol 24 hours a day at its new store being built in Clough Street, Hanley.

But the decision was made behind closed doors after Stoke-on-Trent City Council decided to ban members of the press and public who had gone to the Civic Centre in Stoke to attend the meeting of the licensing sub-committee.

The authority refused to say why it had decided to consider the supermarket giant's application in secret.

But a source has told The Sentinel the decision was made because council officers raised concerns that staff at Tesco in Longton had failed to implement its Challenge 25 policy when Trading Standards sent a test purchaser, aged over 18, into the supermarket to buy alcohol. Under the store's policy, staff should ask for ID from anyone they believe is under 25.

It is believed a report presented at the meeting contained the personal details of those used in the sting.

But it is not known why the council did not instead black out the details of the individuals named so the meeting could remain open to the public.

The decision was made by Councillor Majid Khan, who was standing in as chairman of the licensing sub-committee, after key member Joy Garner could not take part because she used to work for Tesco.

But Councillor Roy Naylor, who sits on the committee, made his opposition to the decision clear by making a comment on the social networking site Twitter after the meeting.

His tweet said: "Unhappy about this morning's licensing sub-committee meeting, also having been an open agenda it had to become a closed one. Can't say more."

Mr Naylor said the tweet was down to his "frustration" at the way the meeting was going and has now backed Mr Khan's decision to exclude the press and public.

"I was quite upset yesterday and I've since had a look at the council's constitution and they were quite right to close the meeting to maintain the anonymity and I would've done the same thing if I was chair."

A spokesman for Tesco said the company would have had no problem with details of the underage drink sales being heard in public.

He said: "We welcome test purchases and we also conduct tests ourselves to make sure our staff are on the ball. We take all of our responsibilities very seriously but from time to time things slip through."

He said all Tesco staff were encouraged to make sure they did not sell alcohol to minors.

Staffordshire Police and Trading Standards had both objected to Tesco's plans to sell alcohol 24 hours a day at its new store, which opens on November 15.

The supermarket's application was approved with a number of conditions including that the £50 million store must install CCTV, have someone monitoring the self-service tills and have door supervisors working between 10pm and 7am.

Mr Khan and Mrs Garner declined to comment. Mr Naylor was unavailable.

Like this story? Share it with friends

22
Tweet this article
Report

22 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by anon, hanley

    Friday, October 15 2010, 12:44AM

    “And before anyone goes into one about people going to Tesco after chucking out time I pretty sure it's illegal to seel alcohol to people who are visibly intoxicated.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by anon, hanley

    Friday, October 15 2010, 12:43AM

    “Any chance of people exercising a little common sense on this?

    Tesco is a shop, not a pub. In pubs people buy alcohol to drink there and then on the premises. In shops, people generally buy alcohol to take away and drink whenever they want. Therefore do the hours Tesco are allowed to sell drink make any difference to when people will drink it? Answer: no.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Johntoe, Stokie planet Earth.

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 11:39PM

    “Ron,
    We seem to agree more than disagree,
    I have no problem with adults using any drug, legal or otherwise, so long as they are fully aware of the risks that they are taking,
    But that's the problem, Because drink is legal, and because it's rarely, if ever, refered to as a drug by the media and law, "drink AND drugs" some people believe that alcohol is ok "it's not a proper drug"
    and yet it's probably as deadly, if not more so, as heroin, and very easy to become addicted to as well,

    I used to drink a lot more than I do now, I am almost T total these days,
    In my youth (I am 57 now) I mixed with all sorts of people, I worked backstage in the music industry,
    and any and all sorts of drugs were easily available,
    Did I take them? No, (except for canabbis, which most people who know their subject agree, is FAR less 'dangerous' than alcohol)
    I have been to 3 funerals of people I knew who died as a direct result of drug abuse (one was my father)
    and in every case, the drug was alcohol,

    As far as I am aware there is only one country in Europe that has dared to try another way of dealing with the issue of drugs, ALL drugs, and that is Portugal,

    They decriminalised the possession of small amounts "for personal use" of ALL drugs in 2001,
    a recent independant report called it "a resounding success on ALL fronts"

    Drug related, crime, disease, deaths, ALL down considerably, more addicts than ever are coming forward to ask for help to quit, now that they are no longer treated as criminals,
    the numbers of people using 'soft drugs' rose slightly at first, but has now gone back to roughly where it was before the laws changed,
    the number of "hard drug" users stayed about the same for a while,
    But since the change, there are now LESS "hard drug" users in Portugal than there were when it was a crime,

    I want to see ALL drugs controlled,
    and while some drugs remain outside the law, then only criminals will be involved,

    IF we REALLY want to hurt the criminals AND protect our kids, then WE need to have control and not the gangsters,
    Because, like it or not, drugs are here to stay,”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by PARVEZ AKHTER, TUNSTALL

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 11:02PM

    “NO WONDER THE COUNCIL IS IN A MESS, SOME1 WHO HAS ONLY BEEN A COUNCILLOR FOR ROUGHLY 5 MONTHS IS MADE THE CHAIR TO MAKE A VERY IMPORTANT DECSION, WHEN HE HAS NO EXPERENCE AT ALL?????????”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Ron, Blythe Bridge

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 8:51PM

    “Tonyjohnt - I would describe drinking sensibly as perhaps having a glass of wine with a meal at the weekend or having a couple of cans watching TV a couple of times a week. That is pretty much my habit, I accept that when I was younger I may have drank a little more, though not much more because a lot of my career was spent driving. I am now in a job where I still have to drive on a regular basis. I cannot remember the last time I was drunk probably when I was about 18 - I am 50 now. I have never caused trouble through drink, ever in my life. I, like a lot of other people, find it difficult to grasp why todays younger generation seem to have a couple of drinks and then want to take on the world. It is also only your opinion that it is vile tasting stuff; after all it comes in various forms and flavours and because you dont like it doesn't mean that it is vile to someone else. There are various things that I do not like the taste of but it doesn't mean it is vile to someone else. What do I get out of my little tipple? Well let me see - I find it relaxing, a bit like sitting with a cup of tea after a meal. Another thing some doctors say certain alcoholic drinks are actually good for you particularly red wine that contains antioxidants and is good for the blood. Obviously too much is bad for your liver amongst other things, it is a matter of moderation. although apperently some people do not know when to stop.

    Johntoe - I accept that you are right about if alcohol became illegal we would have trouble with crime. That would come from the ones who are already alcoholics and a lot of those, not all, are also addicted to some other substance. I for one would do without, I wouldn't be pleased because having given up tobacco 10 years ago I consider that I am pretty clean living and the odd drink is my only vice. However, I would not turn to a backstreet dealer or bootlegger as they were during prohibition era in the states. Reason for that is that I am not addicted to it and could easily learn to do without it.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Johntoe, Stokie planet Earth

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 8:01PM

    “ANTHONY & RON.

    Thanks for your responses and thanks for 'almost' responding without much name calling and insults,
    a refreshing change for this place,
    I will address the points you both make and will not resort to name calling or insults either,

    ANTHONY, good points, now, we are almost there, you are quite correct when you say you don't see many 'alkies' robbing old ladies and breaking into houses etc in order to get money to buy the wet drug,
    NOW, take the next step and ask why is that?
    it's because booze is legal,
    IF booze was given it's place amongst all the other recreational drugs, it would without doubt be a class A drug,

    AND I guarantee that IF alcohol was made illegal tomorrow, in less than a week there would be stories here in this paper of "dirty 'pop head' scum" involved in exactly the sort of crimes you mention,
    and within days "dirty booze dealing scum" would be "making money out of people's misery" from a house near you,

    the vast majority of "drug related crimes" happen BECAUSE drugs are illegal,
    and criminals will always exploit prohibition.

    RON,
    firstly, where did I "tar everyone with the same brush"?
    I seems to me that you are the one doing the tarring, you apear to believe that I judge everyone who drinks alcohol badly (I don't, I like the odd pint myself)
    and THEN you go on to 'tar' all users of any drug other than 'alcohol, "with the same brush" as well as myself and tonyjont, double standards much?

    it is possible to use any drug responsibly actually, history is full of many famous people from all walks of life who were drug users,

    and as for "old biddies" I think you again need to do more research,... Queen Victoria? opium, canabbis,...

    DRUGS, all drugs, legal or otherwise, are a BAD thing, use of them should be discouraged at ALL times, and that includes alcohol,
    But we will NEVER control drugs as long as we surrender that control to the criminals,
    they can only be controlied if they are inside the law,

    But, all habits are hard to 'kick' and over 50 years of being told how to think, and being given your opinions, instead of being encouraged to form you own, is gonna take some serious 'cold turkey' to get out of,

    Peace.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Tonyjohnt, Hanley

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 7:56PM

    “Ron, Blythe Bridge (something in the water) - what is drinking sensibly?

    People drink alcohol to get get drunk. Why on earth would they drink the vile tasting stuff otherwise?

    Wouldn't we all drink natural orange juice or Ribena if we weren't looking for a kick?

    Fine though - you have your drug of choice, just don't criminalise those who choose a different substance.

    They are quick to talk about the misery other drugs cause on this site. They choose to ignore the misery alcohol causes. 16,000 deaths in the UK every year, implicated in most murders and rapes. Broken marriages and families.

    Yep, nowt like a sociable drink!”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Ron, Blythe Bridge

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 6:03PM

    “Tonyjohnt and Johntoe banging the same drum I see. Obviously, you have had some sort of bad run in with alchohol, well don't tar everybody who drinks with the same brush; some of us can drink sensibly and responsibly and can drink moderately without it becoming a problem. You pair come across as though nobody other than you have got any common sense. Herion and crack cocaine cannot be used with common sense unless they are used by the health service. People who use those types of drugs have got no common sense. You dont see many old ladies enjoying the odd snort of coke, however, you might see an old lady enjoying a tipple with her meal. Also at this moment in time alchohol is legal and other drugs aint.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by level headed, Norton le Moors

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 5:38PM

    “My understanding of asking for ID from people under 25 is because there are a lot of 16 and 17 year old children that look older than they are. I suspect most fail to look in their late 20's though. Therefore if a staff member asks to see ID from people appearing to be under 25 then these 'older looking' children will get found out.
    Makes sense really!

    Also, why should I be denied the right to purchase a bottle of wine, being completely sober at the time, at 4am when I have just finished work?

    Don't forget, it is an offence for a licencee to serve a person alcohol whilst that person is drunk. I can't see late night revellers staggering incoherently to Tesco to continue their binge. After all, these very revellers don't sit inside Tesco at 7pm boozing on the cheaper alcohol, why should they do it after hours?”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Anthony, Mount Pleasant

    Wednesday, October 13 2010, 5:05PM

    “Johntoe

    Whilst I can kind of see your point, you don't see many alcoholics robbing old ladies or breaking into houses to fund their habit like you do with druggies.

    People frown upon druggies as they make other peoples lives a misery as well as their own.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters