Relocation of council HQ to Hanley is 'sheer madness', say Save our Stoke campaigners
CITY council leader Mohammed Pervez was heckled by residents at a public meeting as he pledged Stoke town 'will not suffer' as a result of the authority's relocation to Hanley.
Save our Stoke campaigners handed over a petition against the new £40 million HQ at a full council meeting last night.
-

CAMPAIGN: Protest organiser Andy Bentley makes a stand outside Stoke Civic Centre. Picture: Mark Scott
Lord Mayor Terry Crowe threatened to adjourn the meeting and have residents evicted from the public gallery after Mr Pervez's rebuke to the petition was drowned out by jeers.
Richard Snell, aged 66, of Honeywall, Stoke, co-ordinator of the Save our Stoke campaign, told the chamber: "The residents of this city are bitterly angry. Your plans, which make so much sense to you, are sheer madness to the rest of us.
Panasonic Store Camera•20x Optical Zoom LEICA DC Lens from 24mm...
View details
What Digital camera Gold award winning DMCTZ40
SAVE £20 off our store price ONLY with this voucher
Plus you can also claim a SD card or spare battery
Choice of colours, free parking behind store
Terms: Print this voucher and hand in at Panasonic Store Hanley to save £20 off our store price ONLY £269.90
Contact: 01782 342609
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
"Stoke town is traditionally the home of Stoke-on-Trent's government. We insist that you keep it that way.
"Moving the civic offices at such vast expense is a giant step too far. The people of Stoke-on-Trent pay you to look after their interests. It's about time you did so."
Councillor Dave Conway, leader of the opposition City Independents, said: "You will leave Stoke barren – that is unless you are going to borrow another £40 million to spend here."
Independent councillor Randy Conteh, who represents Penkhull and Stoke, asked for the petition to be referred to a scrutiny committee 'for a full public debate'.
But ruling Labour members rejected his proposal as cabinet approval for the Civic Centre sale has already been given.
Traders and residents fear Stoke will be cut adrift by the relocation of 1,300 workers to Hanley's Central Business District.
The council insists it will be able to sell the Civic Centre, King's Hall and Spode to a major developer.
Mr Pervez said: "People need to wake up to the reality of the amount of work that is going into the city centre and our city.
"Building Schools for the Future is bringing £260 million investment with £60 million put in by the council, a state-of-the-art bus station is being built which will open the doors to a £350 million private sector shopping and leisure complex.
"This will be followed by the Central Business District, of which we're becoming the anchor tenant to ensure we bring further investment into the city centre, which is for the whole city.
"In terms of the future for Stoke town. I'm confident we'll put the spending power back into these buildings and Stoke will not suffer in the long run."
Socialist Party members staged a small demonstration before the meeting.
Andy Bentley, Staffordshire organiser of the Socialist Party, said: "We are protesting against the fact that this council wants to borrow millions to move 1,300 workers a mile up the road at a time of savage cuts that have seen services, libraries and swimming pools close.
"There is a lot of anger across the entire city. We will mobilise this massive opposition and continue to try to force them to back down on this decision."




Comments
by Lammy55
Sunday, January 27 2013, 11:16AM
“Pressed the u instead of the i in idea I put udea”
by Lammy55
Sunday, January 27 2013, 11:15AM
“I have wrote to Mr Pervez email about this stupid udea of his moving to Hanley, but he just ignored it.
He said they will sell the civic centre and the kings hall to developers that means that the the great building of the kings hall will be knocked down.
He is an utter waste of space as is his follwers.”
by eltel
Sunday, December 23 2012, 1:09PM
“When are we going to get off our backsides and do something about these clowns. If we don't try to do something about this madness. we will be to blame as much as these load of incompetent cretins”
by davidmayer
Monday, November 26 2012, 11:53PM
“Dear Mr Pervez,
hardly surprising that I didn't get a reply to my last e-mail. You can't defend the indefensible.
And now you're planning on wasting another £40 million on new council buidlings? That look like a kid's toybox?
Quite fitting, some might say.
After people have lost their jobs and suffered pay cuts in these hard economic times?
And what will happen when the "pie in the sky" economic miracle you are promising doesn't happen? Will you resign?
Anyone who voted for this white elephant should hang their heads in shame - I hope they are all clearly named come the day of reckoning.
You all have champagne mouths, but lemonade pockets. This is OUR money not your plaything. I also note the rather dire financial situation of Genr8. Looks like another "Iceland" balls-up is heading our way.
First the Unity House debacle, then the Civic Centre, and now this - if this wasn't so wasteful and hypocritical, you would be the laughing stock of the country.
Put it to the vote - let us have an e-petition - and then we'll see how democracy doesn't work in this city.
Stoke is a city of 6 towns - Hanley is already short of parking space.
Are you going to provide free parking for your employees who move there? Or just the chosen ones??
Or is that the plan - pump your already hard-trodden employees for parking money?”
by I_Norris
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 8:22AM
“Nobodylistens Realis have now revealed the names of the 11 retailers to have signed up for CitySentral Superdry, H&M, Topshop, bank, JD sports, Next, M&S, TK Maxx, Frankie & Bennys, Chiquito, and nandos
A few more relocations but lookin good, just hope construction can now start when bus station opens”
by Nobodylistens
Tuesday, September 11 2012, 12:41AM
“Absolute madness!!!! Mr Pervez has some deluded idea that moving the council to Hanley will benefit the Council Tax payers of Stoke-on-Trent. At a cost of £40 million pounds this equates to over £30,000 for every Stoke-based council employee. I am willing to bet that we will not get £30,000 value for money from each employee!
Pervez has a very worrying trait which was prevalent in Germany during the 20's and 30's and he is very quick to ostracise anyone who does not agree with him.
His reasoning behind the move is both facile and pointless, since the operation of the council will not change. His argument is that the Kounsil move to Sitee Sentral will attract other large organisations into the new commercial/retail venture. Does he not have confidence that Sitee Sentral can sell itself? There again who would want to move their organisation into a gigantic spelling mistake (another costly expenditure by our prudent council).
I can think of lots more deserving organisations and council-run establishments previously closed that could benefit from an injection of cash from the £40 million earmarked for this travesty, but of course the people who pay the wages of these politicians don't have a say in how their money is spent.”
by FredBear
Monday, September 10 2012, 11:38PM
“L_Norris
Yes, you are undoubtedly correct in why the council feel the need to move. Obviously Genr8 fell short on commitments and to keep the CBD alive they need to make the move. Recession etc has inevitably played a hand in this.
But we still need a city centre which works. Ideally this would have been kickstarted by the developments themselves, but as it happens, to make it happen there needs to be an injection of inner city workers spending leisure time and money in the city centre. Our social assets need to be pooled together to make a strong successful nucleus which can grow.
It's not easy to swallow. The easy reaction is to bash the council. What the heck, they have deserved a bashing on many occasions. But they aren't doing this just to have a nice new office.
Personally I think it's a mistake to make a new building for them even though I agree they need to move workers to Hanley. I would advise the purchase of unused building assets to be renovated as council offices so we give a new use to the high streets which increasingly find it difficult to find tenants. £40m would make our existing city centre look amazing and those units could be sold off easily as the centre becomes successful. Instead they are banking on building a new part to the city in the hope the connecting parts of the town become more inviting to business. But that won't happen. You'd probably need to go to Berlin for something as sensible as that.”
by I_Norris
Monday, September 10 2012, 10:18PM
“Fredbear. "these are the true reasons as to why the council are moving."
Err no had this been the case it would been discussed from outset back in 2009 when Genr8 where choosen. The real reason is that genr8 have failed to get any tenants so the council are jumping in feet first to try and keep idea of CBD alive.
If CBD is success and all units built it will still create the same footfsll into retail Hanley wether the Council offices are there or not.”
by fredthefrib
Monday, September 10 2012, 9:10PM
“He said the people need to wake up to the reality of the amount of work that is going into the city centre and our city.
Perhaps he should wake up to the fact that if you keep people in the dark about your schemes
and plot behind their backs until everything is signed and sealed, you will get a backlash
How high handed and politically naive can you get.
Big brother knows best, oh really!!!
Stoke will always be the centre of our City by the traditions of our past not just in name alone.
Hanley is the commercial and cultural centre, but Stoke should stay our Civic Centre.
They should be encouraged to come together by expansion, not shrink apart by small mindedness.”
by putmefootinit
Monday, September 10 2012, 6:17PM
“Moving staff to Hanley
9hours parking at £1.50/hr = £13.50/day = £67.50/week = £3037.50/year (based on 45 wk year taking into account bank holidays & holidays)
£3037.50 x 1300 employees = £3,948,750 either parking revenue collected in hanley is going to hit an all time high or thats nearly another £4million a year it's going to cost to be in hanley if staff parking is free.”