Penkhull school pupils sent home for wearing wrong shoes

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, September 13, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

PARENTS are furious after their children were sent home from school – for wearing the wrong type of black shoes.

Thirty pupils at Thistley Hough High School, in Penkhull, were told to leave lessons because they were wearing black canvas shoes instead of leather-look footwear.

  1. UNHAPPY Chris Coomer with the shoes his sons were wearing.

    UNHAPPY: Chris Coomer with the shoes his sons were wearing.

  2. BAN: Thistley Hough High.

    BAN: Thistley Hough High.

Mums and dads are angry because they claim they were only told on Friday of the new stricter uniform policy – three days into the start of term.

Chris Coomer was furious when his three boys, Callum, aged 15, Reece, aged 14, and 13-year-old Cameron were sent home on Monday because of their canvas shoes.

SELL your HOME for £399 plus vat.*

Whitegates Estate Agents & Lettings

View details

Print voucher

Call WHITEGATES Today 01782 209935 ..Limited offer. Available only up on production of voucher. Sell your home for £399 plus vat.* #EPC is required to market your home not included in offer.

Terms: *Upfront payment, non-refundable in the event of property remaining unsold, being withdrawn from the market or being sold by another agent, yourself or by any other means.#EPC £62.50 plus vat.

Contact: 01782 209 935

Valid until: Thursday, July 04 2013

The 45-year-old, of Tolkien Way, Stoke, said: "They've changed the policy after we've forked out £100 on new shoes. We've offered to replace them with leather shoes when they need replacing, but not before. We can't afford to get three new pairs."

The driving instructor called the school and was told the boys would be sent home again on Tuesday unless their shoes were changed. Chris said: "My wife Louise wanted to keep them at home but the problem then is we'll get in trouble for not sending them to school."

Callum, who is studying for his GCSEs, was sent home again on Tuesday but allowed back in yesterday. He said: "It's just stupid. People are getting sent home for having the same pair of shoes they wore last year."

Alisha Wood's 15-year-old son Levi and nephew Cory, also aged 15, have also fallen foul of the new uniform rule.

The 43-year-old healthcare worker, from Penkhull, said: "The parents are in uproar. The school didn't specify what material the shoes were supposed to be. They say girls' skirts are too short, trousers are too high and people have the wrong haircut or colour."

Pam Window's 15-year-old daughter Rebecca Attwood was sent home for having a tint of red in her hair that she has had for about two years.

Pam, aged 37, of Trent Vale, said: "You can hardly see the tint and I think it looks fine. Some of the teachers have bright red hair. She looks smart and she gets A grades. This is her GCSE year and I don't want her sat at home."

Pam said she also had to borrow money to buy her 13-year-old son William Bell a new pair of shoes after he was sent home for wearing pumps.

Acting head Holly Hartley said the information had been sent home with pupils at the end of last year. She added: "We are trying to raise expectations across the school and uniform underpins this. The school is preparing the future generation of this city for the working world and how we dress does matter. This year, we've introduced a staff dress code too."

She added the school had a hardship fund and would work sensitively with any parents who wanted to use this.

She added: "We are trying to take Thistley Hough back to where it belongs as a top class school."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for reallifemum

    by reallifemum

    Tuesday, September 18 2012, 2:35PM

    “Well, well at long last a few of you now realise what the real problems are at Thistley Hough. It is a sad state of affairs when a school returns to special measures through inadequate leadership and the only people punished are the children and Teachers, who have been busting a gut despite poor leadership and management. Oh no it does not stop with the leadership from the immediate school staff e.g. Head teacher, Deputy Head Teachers, Assistant Head Teachers but the Governing Body too. Are parents even aware that an interim governing body has been brought into the school and the reasons why? Do parents realise that Mr Haines along with the School Business Manager are suspended from their duties. It took CEAT to inform parents at a meeting few could be bothered to attend. What has really happened to Mr Haines, following a long list of lies from the school itself? Whilst on the note of CEAT why do parents not care who is taking over their Childs school? Why is the local community happy to settle for an unknown entity? Especially when they were chosen by a Head Teacher and Governing Body who have now been removed from duty. Where is the LA? Now let's see that's right they are too busy dealing with the disruption that has already occurred and to keep their own name out of it, in the hope of washing their hands of Thistley Hough as soon as reasonably possible. What do the front line staff feel? You know those that really matter i.e. Teachers and Support Staff. Well after speaking to a few of them it would appear that they hugely oppose CEAT and their pleas to find a sponsor with a proven record, that can drive through standards in the schools weaker areas e.g. Maths and English have fallen on deaf ears. Should a new leadership team have been brought in? Absolutely and a new Head Teacher sought, one with experience and a proven record for driving standards. Any Senior Leaders that were worth keeping have moved on, no doubt all promoted or running away from what can only be described as a nightmare. From my point of view as a parent the current leadership is weak, it spouts a whole load of hot air, sets unrealistic deadlines for us as parents, (One week to sort new uniform) let alone its staff, but most of all, does not listen. The question remains why have they too not been removed from post? Come back Mr Stephens is what I say, Thistley Hough once again needs your help and expertise. Parents wake up and smell the coffee, worry about what really matters i.e. the management of your child's school and their wellbeing and happiness. Question the motives of CEAT and the remaining senior leaders and save your child's school before it's too late!”

  • Profile image for KatieI

    by KatieI

    Monday, September 17 2012, 6:46PM

    “Of course staff want their students to look smart when attending school, but isn't this up to the parents depending on their financial state. Black leather shoes may be better for kids feet, but our purses only hold so much.

    I thought that school attendance was about learning their lessons and above all to be able to communicate effectively and efficiently as well as the ability to READ,WRITE AND understand MATHS in order to apply for positions in work. So many children leave school unable to do this.”

  • Profile image for VegasBaby

    by VegasBaby

    Sunday, September 16 2012, 2:16PM

    “Interesting comments re what was an improving school only a few years ago. What a difference a poor Headteacher and inexperience SLT can make to a school. My understanding is that the current acting Headteacher claims she had no idea about what was going on at Thistley Hough because she was on maternity leave. She was off for 4 months - it didn't all go wrong just during this time, she was part of the leadership time during the school's decline. How can she and the current team be expected to turn the school around now?

    CEAT - The Creative Education Trust - are due to take over Thistley Hough in January 2013. The school has failed and gone into special measures while it has had media and visual arts status, so why do they think their future is best served now becoming an arts based school?

    Only 34% of students reached the GCSE standard expected for their age this summer. The SLT should be hanging their heads in shame. If this was a private company they'd all be out the door.

    What's needed is a new leadership team led by a new Headteacher with a proven track record, who will inspire and lead staff and students to a bright new future for Thistley Hough.”

  • Profile image for raggo_uk

    by raggo_uk

    Sunday, September 16 2012, 12:03PM

    “Every September these stories appear. My daughter left THHS in the summer, canvas pumps weren't allowed during the 5 years she attended.

    Parents should be more worried about why TTHS is the 2nd worse school in the city for results. They should be more worried about where the Headteacher is.
    They should be more worried about where the Finance Officer is.
    They should be more worried about the obvious lack of good lessons.
    They should be more worried about the standard of learning and teaching.
    They should be more worried about the sponsor that wants to take over this failing school.
    They should be wondering why fresh flowers in the acting Head's office are more important than children leaving with at least 5 A*s to Cs that will provide life chances.

    Things are seriously wrong at TTHS and it starts at the top.”

  • Profile image for raggo_uk

    by raggo_uk

    Sunday, September 16 2012, 11:56AM

    “My daughter left in the summer, canvas shoes were never allowed during the 5 years she attended, nor for the previous 3 years when my son also attended.”

  • Profile image for Schoolsmatter

    by Schoolsmatter

    Friday, September 14 2012, 3:58PM

    “So these furious parents are not worried that the school is to become an academy and that it will no longer be a community school? This school has been part of the community since it was built in 1938. Parents will have even less say in the running of the school in the future so they may well end up not only complaining about the shoes but also the fact that the new sponsors will change the admissions policy so that children living in the area might have to travel elsewhere for their education. Did the Governing Body ask parents if they wanted the school to become an academy? Did they ask the teachers? did they ask the pupils? This school is now being handed over to a private company who need to make a profit. The only way to make a profit is to cut costs so does this mean less teacher? Less books? Paying for sports? I am sure the outrage over shoes will seem like a distant memory when pupils are eating the food that Jamie Oliver got banned from state schools three years ago.

    There have been more responses to this 'uniform outrage' than to the school failing to hit the government floor targets again meaning that students at this school are now without the education they deserve. Do any parents actually wonder what is happening to the Head Teacher and why there is an acting Head at the school? Do any parents know who the Chair of Governors is? Do parents know that the Local Authority send more pupils excluded from other schools to Thistley Hough than any other school?

    The school has its faults, many of them, but the staff are committed to providing a quality education, the leadership team seem to be trying to change course from the shambles of the previous administration and for this to be a success it needs more parents taking an interest in education. The school wants your views negative and positive so email them consumergroup@sgfl.org.uk I am sure the Local Authority would like to hear your views on the number of excluded pupils being sent to the school when there is a new pupil referral unit just down the road with about nine pupils in. As parents we need to support the school and only then can we hold it accountable.”

  • Profile image for warren-lloyd

    by warren-lloyd

    Friday, September 14 2012, 11:55AM

    “You'd have thought Mr. Cooked would have at least cleaned the shoes before he put them on his dinning table.”

  • Profile image for getagrip1970

    by getagrip1970

    Friday, September 14 2012, 11:21AM

    “Can i just clarify why parents were waiting for letters regarding he uniform.They had intended on completely changing the uniform from the begining of september to coinside with the school changing to academy status, however due to red tape and lack of consultation the academy status has been delayed untill january 2013. The plan was still to introduce a complete new uniform, until parents, pupils and i believe some staff disagreed with the proposed uniform and its age appropriatness.The school then did a survey with parents but unfortunatley didnt inform parents of any outcome, so untill the "directory" landed on door mats no parents were really 100% sure what the uniform was at all. I think its safe to safe all parents are in favour of a uniform, all we ask is that clear information is given as to what is expected.”

  • Profile image for ian2080uk

    by ian2080uk

    Friday, September 14 2012, 9:54AM

    “if parents need a letter to tell them what a school uniform is, then didn't these parents go to school? Come on its common sense . school shoes have always been a black leather and always will be due to them being good for the kids feet in all weathers .... and not to mention smart.”

  • Profile image for jm1972

    by jm1972

    Friday, September 14 2012, 8:59AM

    “The uniform hasn't changed so I can't understand why parent's are saying they didn't know what the uniform was and needed letters to clarify this?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article