Parkwood is asking for £300,000 to solve ambulance driver pay row
UNIONS today welcomed reports that a private ambulance firm
has pleaded with the NHS for cash so it can pay all its staff
the same.
Parkwood Healthcare, which ferries 500 patients a day to
hospital appointments in North Staffordshire, is said to have
asked the University Hospital of North Staffordshire for
£300,000 on top of its multi-million pound contract to put all
90 drivers and support staff on the same pay and
conditions.
The move comes on the eve of a meeting next week between
Parkwood chief executive Tony Hewitt and arbitration agency
ACAS to try and resolve the row which dates back a year.
The three-year contract - won from Staffordshire ambulance
service in 2006 - insisted that new and existing staff would
have comparable terms and conditions.
But the union, Unison, has been in dispute with the company
after it paid new staff less and offered them different working
conditions.
Drivers suspended industrial action at Christmas to allow
the issue to go to arbitration.
But, following intervention from a Government Minister, the
local NHS has now threatened legal action if the two-tier pay
system is not abolished.
Today, Unison regional officer Ray Salmon said: “We too have
heard reports that Parkwood has asked the hospital for a
further £300,000.
“As long as our members get the rates laid down by the
contract's code of practice and also receive back pay due to
them, we don't care where the money comes from.”
Hospital communications head Clare Craddock said: “We are
aware Parkwood are meeting with ACAS on Monday next week.
“It is in the interests of all parties that we do not
jeopardise any outcome from that meeting, and therefore we are
not able to comment further at this stage.”
But former Staffordshire ambulance service chief executive
Roger Thayne said he was not surprised Parkwood had had to ask
for more money.
He said: “Nobody could have provided the patient transport
service cheaper than us so the only way a private firm could
beat us on price had to be by paying staff less.
“Parkwood took a gamble that few staff would want to
transfer from us to them and so have the same pay guaranteed.
But more than they expected agreed to go over.
“My bigger concern is that lives have been put at risk
because Parkwood ambulances do not carry defibrillators (heart
start machines) while our fleet did.
“Whichever managers decided to pay more money for a service
which had a greater risk should not be paid by the NHS.”
It emerged in January that the Parkwood group was seeking
buyers for the contract which it said had made losses from day
one blaming “ongoing difficulties in the patient transport
business”.
No-one from Parkwood was available for comment today.
Should Parkwood be given the extra cash?











Comments
by Warren, Stoke on Trent
Thursday, July 24 2008, 12:05PM
“Parkwood made a bid for this contract. If they hed got there figgers out that is of no consern of the NHS. Parkwood sould honner that contract, paying ALL staff what they agreed and reinstate there rights to a union right away. That or tell the NHS that they wish to end the contract and work with them until a new sirvice can be bourght in to take over.”