Mike Wolfe: Fantastic visions obscure grim reality of city plans
In the artist's impression of how the proposed Business District in the city centre might look, Lowry-like matchstick people play happily around futuristic structures and, in the centre, is a youthful figure doing a handstand.
Well, if you think that is a bit fanciful, don't worry, the whole thing is a complete fantasy.
-

FANCIFUL IDEA? The artist's impression of the Central Business District, which Mike Wolfe believes will have a limited impact.
This is a fantasy from the stable which told you that if the ring road were lined with mature trees and banners representing now defunct pottery manufacturers it would bring visitors flocking to a city centre full of empty shops.
It is part of a view which will shortly deliver a new bus station in the belief that this will bring shoppers to the city centre, despite the fact that there will be fewer buses because they have cut the subsidies.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Sunday, June 30 2013
This is part of the plan to kickstart the city centre by kicking Stoke Town and moving jobs out of there in the belief that this will persuade the private sector to create jobs. I can't help wondering why Stoke Town hasn't boomed when all those council jobs are already sited down there? The city centre drawings have been dusted down in support of a new bid to Government for a 'City Deal'.
Now a City Deal in this case is the opposite of its name. This is actually a plan to attract money to the whole of Staffordshire and not the city at all.
It comes to us from the Local Enterprise Partnership, those grassroots locals who persuaded Government to help Jaguar Land Rover to locate by Wolverhampton and delivered more training for Alstom in Stafford. The LEP is a county council-based organisation whose vision for Stoke-on-Trent is of a low-wage manufacturing quarter hidden away from their gentrified agricultural county.
The key to the new bid is that it would devolve power from the Government and hand city and county leaders unprecedented power over how national funding is spent. Regeneration bosses predict that the strategy will create 50,000 jobs in the next decade.
It is not surprising that they claim this, but sadly, they will probably have left with their golden handshakes and index-linked pensions long before we know that this latest fantasy has failed. (Sorry, I know their payouts are irrelevant, but I am trying hard not to mention the obscene third of a million pound payout to child care expert Sharon Menghini).
The LEP's plan to Government claims to be bringing £50m to the area. Most of this money is, of course, would come anyway. The widening of the M6, or HS2 are both good infrastructure projects that we need and will swallow the majority of any new money without giving any control to local regenerators. The other proposals, like more apprenticeships or an innovation centre are good basic things but won't do any more than maintain the current trajectory of decline.
The only distinctively Stokie part of the plan seems to be the wish to use mine workings to deliver heat from way under the city. That is to be welcomed too, but nobody is going to come and live here because the honeycomb of old pit shafts delivers green energy.
This bid is not, therefore a way of getting power from Government; it is a way of giving it to the county council. Actually, even if it were a way of getting a real deal for our city, I wouldn't support it because I think Government strategists are more likely to deliver jobs to Stoke-on-Trent than the locally elected politicians. This plan demonstrates local leaders have no new vision for the city and will not make a place that stands out. We need creative thinking rather than power grabbing.
The most worrying indication of the strategic deficit down at the Town Hall, are the words of the council leader about the new bid. He said last week: "If we are not successful we'll continue with our Mandate for Change." Are we really being told this new plan is intended to be a replacement for "Mandate for Change"?
I have always said the mandate was vacuous, but surely its author can't be ditching it so unceremoniously just to cosy up to a Tory Government and the county council? Is that really their vision for jobs and prosperity? No wonder they have happy workers doing handstands: it isn't real.




Comments
by fegghayesman
Friday, October 05 2012, 10:32AM
“Those buildings would look outdated before they were finished being built.
This move clearly has intentions to which we are being kept from seeing, someones pockets are going to be filled.”
by gormhenghast
Friday, October 05 2012, 7:27AM
“@ Fredbear
"Only in Stoke do we get a picture of some pretty standard, 4 storey block buildings surrounding a square with nothing in it;
and we then call it complete fantasy!"
No we call it Walsall, or any other centre, not York or Chester, Walsall, Wolverhampton, Derby, with the same old , same old retail outlets, nothing unique, nothing original, give me a fiver and I`ll produce as good a plan as any clapped out, nihilistic, over paid designer in this country can come up with. The lot produce UNIFORM DRIVEL, it's like patting a baby on the back over your shoulder, you know it's going to be sick down your back, so why do it??? And Pervez is that sop, the City Council sit there and watch with expectant Joy as it happens, they already know the jokes on him.
Why do we know that it's probably going to be oooooh lets see "St Modwens that gets the contract. You get to a point with these morons where your brain is in the implode mode, if you want to heat this City as in the crazy plan capture the heat generated by the exasperated citizens of Stoke. You can't even think about the management structure and their antics without a sick bag to hand, and then on top of all this Wolfe and his bizarre take on life and politics utters the above visions.
Since the late seventies this city has spiralled out of control into the abyss, maybe it's time that each of the six towns declared independence rescinded 1910 and all that, dropped out of Unitary status, that is one word that "CANNOT" in any way describe this City and its Council "A UNITARY AUTHORITY", when I think of that one even the best jokes told by all the comedians in the land nay Europe can`t tell you a funnier one liner better than Stoke is a "UNITARY AUTHORITY".
As to what to do? Well if it were a club or a company you could call an EAGM, wouldn't mind a mass sacking, and an election, that may achieve, there's no food we can feed the councillors to generate brains, the honest truth is SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE.........................And done before the current regime and current management structure destroy everything.”
by papalazaroo
Thursday, October 04 2012, 11:46PM
“It's easy to agree with people but I think that Gilbert sums it up nicely. Stoke-on-Trent is probably unlike any other city in the world so it begs the question, why should it be regenerated using the methods employed for a traditional radial city? And why such an emphasis on retail with two relative colossuses on the doorstep and internet shopping continuing to rise at the expense of the high street? Despair was mentioned - too right. The only way out I can see is the establishment of a Town and Villages political party, with a local agenda, to fight New (or one nation) Labour at the next elections with a manifesto focusing on regenerating Stoke-on-Trent in a holistic sense. This could include spending across the whole of the Potteries to beautify the place, attract investment and generally make life worth living, and encouraging areas to set up their own town councils to increase civic pride and political awareness to ensure this complacent bunch don't get in again. That really might sound fanciful but I really can't see any other way.”
by richardhannay
Thursday, October 04 2012, 10:33PM
“I am suffering from "promise fatigue". As a native of the City( although I live in Leek) I have witnessed over the recent years so many half baked and vacuous promises that in the end a weariness has crept in. Over the years we have had the Renew fiasco- I drove down Botteslow St the other day and saw the grassy wastes and debris landscape common throughout the city. We have had 6 SRBs since the 90s that have made no impact on the city save bathing Stoke Town Hall in luminous light, we have had the Hanley Green corridor again a failure, the " pioneer" deal with E-on which crashed,Hanley Bus Station late and designed to accommodate fewer buses.... Middleport....Victoria ground....the beano's in Cannes " to meet people from Manchester" according to Meredith. Even the Hanley centre plan is essentially re playing debates had in the 70s. To quote Terry Thomas " a shower, an absolute shower"”
by richardhannay
Thursday, October 04 2012, 10:33PM
“I am suffering from "promise fatigue". As a native of the City( although I live in Leek) I have witnessed over the recent years so many half baked and vacuous promises that in the end a weariness has crept in. Over the years we have had the Renew fiasco- I drove down Botteslow St the other day and saw the grassy wastes and debris landscape common throughout the city. We have had 6 SRBs since the 90s that have made no impact on the city save bathing Stoke Town Hall in luminous light, we have had the Hanley Green corridor again a failure, the " pioneer" deal with E-on which crashed,Hanley Bus Station late and designed to accommodate fewer buses.... Middleport....Victoria ground....the beano's in Cannes " to meet people from Manchester" according to Meredith. Even the Hanley centre plan is essentially re playing debates had in the 70s. To quote Terry Thomas " a shower, an absolute shower"”
by GilbertL
Thursday, October 04 2012, 8:17PM
“RegenMan1, in answer to your questions: I'm suggesting that the council don't have a full grasp of what the regeneration will cost nor how long it will take for it to be a success. I feel they are missing a trick. They are determined to throw all the money at Hanley, yet there are 6 towns which make up this city. The other 5 towns have been left to go to wrack and ruin, yet £60million of borrowed money could be plenty of money to turn each town into a commercial, retail and residential success. But no, the council see the benefit of directing all borrowed monies at the one town that has difficult access and already a falling commercial and retail situation. The city of Stoke-on-Trent has to compete with other easily accessible cities such as Manchester and Birmingham, and the high-end retailers such as Waitrose, Selfridges and Harvey Nichols will never come here because Stoke-on-Trent is not on the same page as Manchester or Birmingham. I would prefer the council to spend money in all 6 towns and not just Hanley. I cannot see the attractiveness of Hanley, I never shop there unless I have to, and I even lived there for a year whilst at university. Regarding people who leave at the first opportunity, I have no figures and I have not researched this matter, yet comments appear on here and elsewhere on the internet from ex-pats who all have their reasons for leaving. My reason for leaving this city is because the council are hell bent on spending borrowed money on things we already have that are not broken, yet are happy to make cuts to services that people desperately need. That doesn't sit well with me at all. Maybe I am lucky as you call it, I can, if I want to (and do want to) move away from Stoke-on-Trent. I've lived here all my life, yet I'm never been in so much despair about the city as I am now. The pits and pots are long gone, and the council are happy to abandon the heritage which led to the city status, in favour of pursuing a project that isn't enticing the "big guns". I sincerely hope the whole thing is a success and I am proved wrong, however, I am a realist and with the latest political debacle about the West Coast Mainline franchise, I can't help being doubtful about success. I can't wait to see what the world class public services will be, or maybe I'm just cynical.”
by amartinone
Thursday, October 04 2012, 6:01PM
“I'll never understand why Stoke and Staffordshire formed an LEP. The Potteries to the north is a distinct city region in its own right, while toward the south of the county you're pretty much in the Black Country.
Why couldn't they make an LEP made up of North Staffordshire and South/East Cheshire? These areas have a lot more in common.”
by stokemaveric
Thursday, October 04 2012, 5:56PM
“that figure doing a cartwheel in the middle of the square is john van der earnalott after learning that he and his fellow council executives have just had another massive ''pay'' rise...”
by FredBear
Thursday, October 04 2012, 5:35PM
“Only in Stoke do we get a picture of some pretty standard, 4 storey block buildings surrounding a square with nothing in it;
and we then call it complete fantasy!”
by GilbertL
Thursday, October 04 2012, 3:56PM
“RegenMan1, I wrote a lengthy reply to your comment, but the site crashed whilst trying to submit it. If I get a moment, I will try to reply to your comments this evening.”