BREAKING NEWS
 

March plan to halt city council's HQ move to Hanley

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

CAMPAIGNERS are preparing to march across Stoke-on-Trent in protest at controversial plans to relocate council offices.

Thousands of people are opposing Stoke-on-Trent City Council's proposals to move its headquarters from Stoke to Hanley.

  1. ANGER: From left, John Flint, Alan Gerrard, Alan Barrett and Alan Lear  show off their new poster.  Pictures: Malcolm Hart

    ANGER: From left, John Flint, Alan Gerrard, Alan Barrett and Alan Lear show off their new poster. Pictures: Malcolm Hart

  2. VIEWS: The meeting in progress.

    VIEWS: The meeting in progress.

Action group March On Stoke is organising a demonstration which will see protesters walking from Hanley to the existing Civic Centre in Stoke.

Around 30 attended last night's third planning meeting for the march, which is set to take place on February 23.

Visiting the Home & Garden show this Sunday?
We will have some exclusive deals for you so make sure you visit our stand and say hello

Terms: With free entry just visit the show at the Moat House hotel Festival Park between 11am and 4pm and pick up a leaflet

Contact: 01782 342609

Valid until: Sunday, June 23 2013

The new civic centre, which will cost taxpayers £40 million, will be the 'anchor tenant' in the proposed Central Business District in Hanley.

Around 1,300 council workers are expected to vacate their old headquarters in Stoke in 2015.

Opponents of the move have questioned the wisdom of spending so much money on new offices at a time of wide-ranging council cutbacks.

They also believe businesses in Stoke will suffer when the Civic Centre closes.

Meeting chairman Alan Barrett said: "Three years ago the plan was to build the central business district in Stoke. What's changed since then?

"Stoke has the A50, the A500 and the railway, it's got lots of empty land that needs developing. I've got nothing against having Hanley as our retail centre, but it shouldn't be developed to the detriment of the rest of the city."

Mr Barrett said he hoped for 1,000 to go on the march, which would be followed by a rally in Stoke.

He added: "We might just get 50 but the numbers aren't important. It's the message that's important."

Group member Bill Mack said: "It's simply not necessary at a time of austerity. I need a new car, but I can't afford it so I'm just making do. To not do that, and to actually borrow money, is just suicide."

Stoke Socialist Party has gathered nearly 3,000 signatures for a petition against the proposals. Party organiser Andy Bentley said he expected large numbers of protesters to turn up for the march.

The 59-year-old, from Hanley, said: "We've had a wide range of people coming to the meetings. Some have been owners of small businesses in Stoke, some have been unemployed, some have been old and some have been young. It's been a real cross-section of society.

"Nearly everyone is opposed to moving the council headquarters to Hanley, and you can probably count the people who are in favour of it on two hands. The council will have to pay back three to five times the cost of the move, and it will be council taxpayers who will have to pay."

Nearly 1,000 people have signed a another petition started by Martin Peet, who runs the Mr Simms Olde Sweet Shoppe chain.

Residents wanting to sign Mr Peet's petition should visit epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/41825

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for usversusthem

    by usversusthem

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 6:58PM

    “Valiant2008

    Can you please tell me how are the views of 10 Labour Cabinet members representative of the views of all the residents of Stoke on Trent.

    Our next meeting is in a church and if that is still a problem, please suggest a venue and I'll raise it at our next committee meeting.

    We are a non-political group of residents who are asking a simple question "Do you have confidence in your Councillors and Officers to administer this city for the benefit of it's residents." This question was deliberate as it polorises responses. People will make their own response based on their personal experiences of life in this city and will answer accordingly.
    If your answer is "NO" then please stop writing about it and do something positive and join our march.
    If your answer is "YES" then you can get on with your life knowing that everything will be OK. (Please remember that the leaders of our main political parties have all said sorry for what their party has been responsible for in the past. Unfortunately for us it is we that have to live with their inappropriate actions and past decisions.Personally I don't want my grandchildren to be paying off the debts created by people who in all probability will not be here.)

    Alan Lear, Lightwood.”

  • Profile image for Tinsdills Solicitors

    by Tinsdills Solicitors

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 4:41PM

    “The only reason they want to move to a new site is not because they need to but because basically no-one in this economic climate wants to move onto the site. They can't just build it in the hope that someone thinks they'll move there. What will happen is that the council will build their building and then because no one else will move in the project will be a half baked one as usual. You're then left with a new business area that contains no new business and an old council office which no one will want to buy and will remain derelict just like the last office they moved out of.

    I am still trying to figure out why any business would move to the centre of Hanley when there are cheaper, better places to move to with more parking, better connections and more space. The development is a big gamble that really hasn't been thought through properly. Hanley lacks any prestige so won't encourage significant businesses here. The money would be far better spent on regenerating Burslem for example which is basically dead now.

    I'm glad I don't pay any taxes to SOTCC.”

  • Profile image for marchonstoke

    by marchonstoke

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 2:56PM

    “The next meeting is at Christchurch Tunstall on the corner furlong rd and the high street on Monday 21st Jan at 7:30pm”

  • Profile image for BucknallMel

    by BucknallMel

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 2:16PM

    “Hey, valiant, take a look at the photos of the meeting - I count at least six women, some young people are clearly visible, and what has skin colour got to do with it? Are you suggesting that those of us who don't want this absurd and unacceptably expensive civic centre move are RACIST? We are not talking about a protest against a mosque or islamic school, you know, just the presidential palace fantasy of a mixed race group of trough hoggers. And these were the organisers, not the entire protest campaign. If that's the best you can do for a smear campaign you're not worth what the council are paying you.”

  • Profile image for Clozzer

    by Clozzer

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 12:30PM

    “I just don't see how borrowing £millions to build a new Civic Center will 'will breed propserity in the surrounding areas'. It will just drain resources trying to pay for it. It the council has that amount of money handy, please spend it on something that WILL bring new business and custom to Stoke on Trent. Seriously, is a new civic center going to make new businesses rush to Stoke on Trent? Of course not!!

    I will be going on this march alongside friends of varying ages and colour, male and femal - like that matters anyway!”

  • Profile image for I_Norris

    by I_Norris

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 12:13PM

    “For up to date info please visithttp://tinyurl.com/aprwsxp and get in touch at marchonstoke@hotmail.co.uk”

  • Profile image for Redtone

    by Redtone

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 12:06PM

    “Valiant2008 - in a true democracy everyone should shout loud. Why should ordinary people's participation begin and end within a few minutes every few years at the ballot box?

    Can you point me to where the article says all those attending the meeting were white middle-aged men? I've read through it several times and can't find that bit.”

  • Profile image for Six_Towns

    by Six_Towns

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 12:00PM

    “'30 odd middle aged white people' Why the reference to colour? And in case you are unaware, the word 'pub' is short for public house. Note the word 'public' as in open to all members of the public.

    Stoke-on-Trent is different. It is a linear city - it is not a city in the truest sense so therefore cannot be treated as any other city in the world. What we have is unique and it is this fact that successive councils have failed to grasp. It should be marketed uniquely and not try to copy other cities. The problem is that successive councils have simply engaged overpaid consultants to tell them how to do something instead of having original thoughts themselves.”

  • Profile image for goathill

    by goathill

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 11:35AM

    “great why not give Tunstall, Longton, Burslem as well as Hanley there own civic centers and waste a bit more money, What they going to do with the Civic center in Stoke that cost a fortune? Turn it in to a Job center.”

  • Profile image for valiant2008

    by valiant2008

    Tuesday, January 15 2013, 10:49AM

    “ALso, how is 30 odd middle aged white people representative of the views of all of Stoke on Trent, also held in a pub therfore excluding some of the community.

    Those who shout the loudest.......”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article