Lou Macari: Ref wrong to send off Huth, but he should admit as much

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, February 07, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

I WOULD have sent off Robert Huth if I'd been refereeing the Stoke game against Sunderland on Saturday because it did look like a nasty challenge initially.

But, and it's a big but, I'd have then rescinded the decision once I'd seen what actually happened from other and better angles.

Then there would have been no need for Stoke to even consider making an appeal.

Had I been ref, I'd have come out, held my hands up and said: "Sorry folks, but I got it wrong."

Now there's a novel thought.

Referees would certainly get a lot more respect from the football public if they owned up to major mistakes like Huth's sending-off.

We all know they will make mistakes and we can forgive them for that.

What we find less forgiving is that when they know they got it wrong – as Martin Atkinson surely must – they then go and hide behind the rules.

A new one on me is that there doesn't have to be intent now for a player to be punished with a sending-off.

No, as long as there is deemed to be something called "excessive force", then the player is still guilty.

I'm sure Martin Atkinson thought at the time it was a nasty challenge, like me and most others would have done.

But now, because there is this crime of excessive force, he can still justify his original decision by pointing to that instead of intent and studs up.

I agree with Tony Pulis when he has a go at the Sunderland midfielder David Meyler for making the most of the challenge.

I blame the player for getting Huth sent off because you can see the referee look at Meyler on the ground making a meal of things before he reached for his red card.

If he was so hurt, then why was he able to get up and play on until being substituted more than 40 minutes later?

I'm afraid we are losing sight of just what this game is about, or should be about, and that's physical contact.

There are going to be fouls, but as long as they are not intentionally aimed at hurting another player, I don't see a problem.

We've even got crowds now reacting and baying for blood every time there is a strong challenge in the game.

A strong challenge is part of the game... or at least it used to be.

Instead, what is creeping horribly into our game is the kind of farce we witnessed in the last Barcelona v Real Madrid game just over a week ago.

Here we have arguably the two best club sides in the world putting on a show for us.

But what we get is the most pathetic 90 minutes of football full of play-acting, harassing the referee, diving, feigning injury, off-the-ball fouls.

You name it, we got it.

And what was just as worrying was that at half-time and full-time neither of the two studio panellists – Rafa Benitez and a Spanish journalist – made any reference to any of this.

It was as though it was commonplace.

Well it might be commonplace in Spanish football, but we don't want that kind of nonsense over here thank you very much.

But sadly it is creeping into our game and, unless we do something about it, we will soon be watching far more diving than tackling.

Is that really the kind of football you want to pay to watch?

More Stoke City articles:

Stoke City: Stoke launch appeal over Huth's red card

Stoke City: Tough call for Atkinson to make, says Hilditch

Stoke City: Pulis calls for action after Huth's red card

Stoke City: Atkinson got big decision wrong, says Woodgate

Match analysis: Stoke City 0, Sunderland 1

8
Tweet this article
Report

8 Comments

  • Profile image for The Old Rec

    by The Old Rec

    Saturday, February 11 2012, 10:53AM

    “The media, particularly SKY, love all this technology, not because it helps the game but because it keeps TV audiences amused. Their money and the demands that go with it have gone a long way towards changing if not ruining the game as we all knew it.
    Why not have a fifth or even a sixth official in case the fourth and fifth officials miss something? They could even do a TV vote between them on controversial decisions.
    Why not have sensors on every player to register whether an opponent made contact or not?
    Why not have cameras on players' boots?
    Why not use satellite imagery?
    Why bother with referees at all if they can't wait until someone has a leg broken before they deem a tackle dangerous enough for a red card?

    IT'S A GAME FOR GOD'S SAKE! Let the players play and the refs referee and Managers have a disciplinary code governing their players. But that doesn't make for good television.”

  • Profile image for soccerfoot11

    by soccerfoot11

    Wednesday, February 08 2012, 9:29PM

    “Come on lets face it. The biggest sport in the world, billions spent on players and game broadcast rights and it doesnt have any kind of video replay to help the ref. Idiotic people saying "it will change the game" " it will slow the game down" "It just wouldnt work in football".
    All BS of course. The game needs to change, it wont slow it down and it definitely would work in football. The clown Blatter is talking about goal line technology. fine, but that is the last type of technology needed. The FA doesnt have video replay to give a decision as it happens so it wont ruin a game like something as huge as England v Germanmy in the world cup or something as minor as the Huth tackle on Saturday. No, they play the archaic, simple minded, well we will use the video after the game to punish the. all when its just too late ! The referees need serious, serious help, i mean the bloody linesman can only run down 1 half of the pitch, why ??? It takes upwards of 5 minutes to get a free kick taken that is in a strategic place in front of goal .
    It really is easy to rectify, easy !!!
    Each team, in every game is given 2 appeals. When something happens that is deemed a problem by the manager he tells the 4th official who tells the ref to stop the game. With instant and I do mean instant video replay the 4th official looks at a screen on the sideline or where ever out of the way and he has 30 seconds only to review the play from every conceivable angle thanks to all the TV cameras present. If he thinks the ref was wrong he says so, if he agrees with the ref, the call stands ! Also, certain calls should be immediately reviewed by officials upstairs regardless of what the fans or managers say. That being a penalty or a red card ! Those 2 situations are simply too important to the outcome of a game for them to be handled by a ref who may or may not have seen the infraction !Once again, 30 seconds to review !
    Im tired of the refs screwing up, tired of hearing they are only human, tired of the consequences of the outcome of bad decisions that seem to come more and more prevalent in the game !
    Come on FIFA, join the 21st century and just about every other major sport in the world with video replay assistance and get with it !”

  • Profile image for robhutch64

    by robhutch64

    Tuesday, February 07 2012, 5:57PM

    “just looking at it from the other side for a moment, we agree it wasnt a sending off but what about the way the sunderland lad fell, couldnt that have been nasty, at least enough to have hurt the lad, so why does pulis no think about that before saying he feined injury, he didnt half come down with a clatter”

  • Profile image for Jayenne

    by Jayenne

    Tuesday, February 07 2012, 12:10PM

    “An excellent suggestion Pensioner46.”

  • Profile image for SCFCSurrey

    by SCFCSurrey

    Tuesday, February 07 2012, 12:07PM

    “I saw that Real madrid v Barca game as well...or rather I saw the first 70 mins until I turned it off in disgust because of the diving, whingeing and play-acting by the Barca players, Fabregas, Alves, Puylol etc. But they are the darlings of the British media and no-one is gong to go against the grain. I fear we are in for this sort of thing when Valencia come to the Brit, and it will be ten times worse at their place.
    Interesting that Graham Poll in yesterday's Mail said the Huth sending off was wrong, but he felt sorry for Atkinson because of the way the Sunderland players reacted.
    The only way it will stop is when managers discipline their own players for cheating. But do we think mancini will drop Johnson for his dive at the weekend, or SAF drop Welbeck for his? Or will Redknapp fine Bale for his cheating at Anfield last night ( for those who didn't see it he dived without being touched and got booked for simulation). Alternatively the FA should have the right to name and shame after each match for obvious cheating, in the way that they can instigate red cards for ncidents not seen by the ref.
    Personally it embarrasses me when one of our team feigns injury ( I reckon there are a couple of our squad who are prone to this) and I would not mind if TP took disciplinary action against them.”

  • Profile image for seths

    by seths

    Tuesday, February 07 2012, 11:19AM

    “@bernwa

    Ha, if Lou had any influence in the game he hardly be writing ****** articles in the sentinel for beer money.”

  • Profile image for pensioner46

    by pensioner46

    Tuesday, February 07 2012, 11:03AM

    “I agree with Bernwa BUT I would also ask that at the end of a match where a controversial decision has been made that the referee's are asked in public to give their reason for making such a decision. Fans of any club pay an awful lot of money to support their club and while to accept losing is hard, to feel that you have been cheated by a bad decision is a very bitter pill to swallow. At the end of matches on MATCH OF THE DAY the managers are always put on the spot for there opinions on the game that has been played so why not ask the referee while you have him in the same area for his point of view and his reasoning”

  • Profile image for Bernwa

    by Bernwa

    Tuesday, February 07 2012, 10:10AM

    “Come on, Lou, you say you would have changed your mind seeing the replay? but you don't actually say bring in technology (TV) to sort out the problem.
    It's about time that people like yourself, who have influence in the game, started to pressurise the F.A. and F.I.F.A. to bring the game up to date instead of sitting on the fence!”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters