Law through a lens: Body cameras for Staffordshire Police officers
MORE than 1,000 police officers are to be equipped with body cameras in a bid to gather vital evidence against criminals.
The technology, which will cost around £250,000, is being introduced by Staffordshire's new police and crime commissioner Matthew Ellis.
-

PERSONAL PROTECTION: Police officers with the cameras installed.
The video cameras, worn on police uniforms, would film encounters with suspected criminals, and could provide valuable evidence in court.
Staffordshire Police have 1,950 officers and 200 PCSOs. It says all frontline bobbies will be issued with body cameras including neighbourhood officers, dog handlers, armed response units, tactical support and road crime officers.
Our range of cleaners are the perfect choice and you always know where to get the bags or belts from so you aren't left searching.
SAVE £10 off any of our cleaners ONLY with this voucher!!!
Terms:
Print voucher and bring in (car park behind store) or hand to our driver for home delivery items.
see www.panasonic-hanley.co.uk for more details of the range & delivery area
Contact: 01782 342609
Valid until: Saturday, June 08 2013
Mr Ellis said: "I have extended it to cover special constables as well, and I'm looking to see if it would be useful for police community support officers too.
"There's very good evidence that body cameras are very good as far as added personal protection.
"It is extremely useful in cases where there's a complaint made against an officer and also in evidence-gathering. They are going to make life easier.
"There has been a trial which has involved a few officers trying the technology out and that has gone extremely well."
Mr Ellis said the cost was 'good value for money' adding: "There's a compelling argument for them. I'm surprised more forces haven't introduced them."
Several forces have introduced body-worn video cameras, but the technology is not widely used throughout the country and few have equipped all beat officers with the technology.
The Home Office gave the go-ahead for police forces in England and Wales to use headcams in 2007. Video footage recorded by officers has been used as evidence before the courts.
West Mercia Police used footage from a headcam as evidence last year in the manslaughter trial of Daniel Keeble, aged 26, of no fixed abode, and 24-year-old Peter John Marston, of Stafford. Both were convicted at Stafford Crown Court.
Andy Adams, chairman of Staffordshire Police Federation, which represents all Staffordshire's beat officers, said: "The principle of the idea, of being able to record incidents for officers' safety is fantastic, I can't argue against it."
Mr Adams said the cameras may give officers more confidence going into situations that could escalate.
But, he added: "I wouldn't like to think the cameras would be worn all the time. It should be the officer's choice when to use them.
"Some of my members will feel it is something they don't want to use."
Tom Simpson, aged 55, of Ridge Road, and secretary of Sandyford and Goldenhill Residents' Association, said: "It's a good idea, but would police officers feel comfortable with it?"
Former Staffordshire Police inspector Nigel Gunn, who left the force in 2011, said: "Police officers should have nothing to fear from body cameras. I think they would reassure the public and the police.
"Everyone was worried to death about CCTV cameras when they were brought in, but that has been an invaluable help.




11 Comments
View all
by stevenweiss
Sunday, February 10 2013, 11:38PM
“I thought policemen had the best cameras already...their eyes? Isn't police evidence admissible any more?”
by 785434
Sunday, February 10 2013, 8:15PM
“I think that this is a great thing - the more evidence that is available in court, the more likely it is that the criminal will get the punishment they deserve”
by Pottersruleok
Sunday, February 10 2013, 7:06PM
“It seems big brother is getting bigger and all in the "name of justice". It's hell being ruled by a socialist government isn't it ?”
by Darrion
Sunday, February 10 2013, 12:03PM
“Remember to switch it off next time you "help" me and steal a bag for a benefefit swindler guys. You were on camera too.”
by potter_red
Sunday, February 10 2013, 11:16AM
“Wouldn't it be cheaper and more useful if the body cameras were just issued to officers who need them the most - like officers who use tasers or guns? The rest of the money that Mr Ellis appears to have spare can then be used to help the council improve the CCTV network so that these cameras can be used to provide a constant, permenant and unbiased feed that will help give everyone confidence when walking the streets. The police dont always see everything that goes on due to their close proximity to the situation but if only one officer has a body cam for proving allegations (against police or public) and CCTV can be used to back this up and help reassure the public that everything is being treated fairly. Under Data Protection Laws you cant ask to see the officers footage but you can ask for a copy of CCTV provided by the council.”
by Backdoored
Sunday, February 10 2013, 8:51AM
“There's more to life and living it -besides obeying the law.
THEY ARE WATCHING YOU.”
by Potter46
Sunday, February 10 2013, 7:07AM
“If you're not breaking the law you have nothing to fear.”
by Backdoored
Saturday, February 09 2013, 11:09PM
“Zombiefied...
Sorry about that hiccup on the last line. Laura 'blocked' my line of transcript.... She's getting desperate that I 'shop now'. B i t c h.”
by Backdoored
Saturday, February 09 2013, 11:07PM
“There seems to be a steady unrelenting use of technology to keep us all safe on street and road..
Speed cameras to disuade the mad petrol-heads from driving recklessly, with a high risk of putting the rest of us in an early Grave. CCTV Cameras to disuade thugs from beating the living daylights out of us...
Will there eventuall y come a day when we are all 'tagged'? Combiefied?”
by stokiemart
Saturday, February 09 2013, 10:08PM
“if the police are there to protect the public maybe the camera's need to be on the end of their truncheons :-)”