Golf fan angry after bookies refuse to pay out £1,250 Bubba Watson bet

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, April 11, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

GOLF fan Lee Beardmore is tee-d off – after bookmaker Coral refused to pay out £1,250 for his winning £1 bet on the U.S. Masters.

The 39-year-old was celebrating after American Bubba Watson won Sunday's championship as his slip gave the odds at 1,000-1.

  1. Lee Beardmore

    Lee Beardmore

But Coral is refusing to pay out because a worker at its Cheadle branch confused Bubba Watson's odds of 40-1 with the 1,000-1 figure for golfing legend, but now rank outsider, Tom Watson.

Now Lee, who manages Seven Day Windows, in Fenton, is stuck in the rough with a goodwill offer of £66.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

Lee, of Prince George Street, in Cheadle, said: "I don't bet very often, but I am an avid golf fan so I enjoy a flutter on the Masters and I couldn't believe it when Bubba won.

"I was really excited when I went to collect my winnings because I've never won that much before. But when I found it was a mistake I didn't know what to think.

"I was gutted and angry because I don't know why I should be punished for someone else's mistake.

"I put good money on a bet which I thought was legitimate and now it turns out it's not worth the paper it's written on."

Brother Rob, aged 39, of Victory Crescent, Cheadle, who actually placed the £1 each way bet, said: "When it comes to the Masters it is anyone's game so I don't think Lee thought that the odds were out of the ordinary.

"If it was somebody like Tiger Woods he might have thought differently."

Lee, right, has already complained to Coral's customer services department. Coral today apologised and blamed the blunder on human error.

Coral spokesman David Stevens said: "This was an unfortunate mix-up with the names, due to human error, for which we apologise sincerely.

"However our rules clearly state that in this situation, bets will be settled at the correct odds at the time the bet was placed, in this case 40-1."

Lee is now planning to appeal to the Independent Betting Adjudication Service which rules on gambling disputes.

Gambling expert Graham Sharpe said: "At no time was Bubba Watson ever quoted by any bookmaker at odds of 1,000-1 to win the U.S. Masters. If anyone has a betting slip with those odds on it, it can only be as a result of an obvious mistake."

What do you think?

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for johnwhite18

    by johnwhite18

    Monday, April 16 2012, 12:29PM

    “Mr Beardmore put the bet on in good faith come on Corels pay the guy up after all if Bubba Watson did not win the masters last week Corals would still keep Mr Beardmore money”

  • Profile image for stokeandvale

    by stokeandvale

    Sunday, April 15 2012, 1:16PM

    “bazamore
    SPOT ON, also all bookmakers state "Bets are settled at the correct odds at the time the bet was placed"

    Zoiders is just looking for a bit of attention, must be lonely.....”

  • Profile image for Wozzer101

    by Wozzer101

    Sunday, April 15 2012, 1:08PM

    “Going off subject a little, no one in law as any right to buy anything. People have a right to refuse a sale, like Tesco and the iPad, that's all they did, refused to sell, unless the price they set was paid. So all you bar stool lawyers can lick um'. I'd have said thanks a lot and ripped the sixty odd quid out of there hands. Some of you lot just talk sooooo much s**t it's unreal.”

  • Profile image for bazamor

    by bazamor

    Sunday, April 15 2012, 12:47PM

    “Zoiders, Tesco Direct who offered the I Pad at the wrong price covered them selves in the conditions attached for using the site.

    12.3 If, by mistake, we have under priced a product, we will not be liable to supply that product to you at the stated price, provided that we notify you before we despatch the product to you. In those circumstances, we will notify the correct price to you so you can decide whether or not you wish to order the product at that price. If you decide not to order the product, we will give you a full refund on any amount already paid for that product in accordance with our refund policy in paragraph17.”

  • Profile image for truepotter

    by truepotter

    Sunday, April 15 2012, 12:08PM

    “If a shop accidentally prices an item you DO NOT have the right to buy it at the price indicated. It can be withdrawn from sale. Check it out at the link.

    http://tinyurl.com/d6favno

  • Profile image for BobThorn

    by BobThorn

    Saturday, April 14 2012, 9:08AM

    “I've got a question for Lee, what's your tip for the Grand National?”

  • Profile image for zoiders

    by zoiders

    Saturday, April 14 2012, 7:00AM

    “And just for those of you trying to prove a technicality - trading standards is about exactly what it says on the tin, to protect standards of trading, if a retailer flaunts a product in the national press or in a widely seen media such as televison or the internet then trading standards will rule in favour of the customer. Small mistakes are forgiven, large mistakes will be punished as it keep retailers in line and stops them cutting corners with lazy advertising standards.

    Tesco - multi national company, there is no excuse for banging put the latest high ticket item with the wrong price on it.

    Pay up scum bags.”

  • Profile image for zoiders

    by zoiders

    Saturday, April 14 2012, 6:54AM

    “Tesco are bound by the "Sale Of Goods Act". They had the iPad advertised nation wide and in the public domain on a huge scale as being onsale at £49.95 for a prolonged period of time, not for minutes or a few hours but for more than a trading day so a mistake is not an excuse. Marks and Spencer had to cave in on the televison sales because they knew they were bound by the sale of goods act. All retailers are bound as such. Sorry but Tesco are obliged to sell the iPad at such a price as advertised as long as the order was placed at the time of advertisement. Weasel words like "terms and conditions" do not over ride trading law or traders could make up any excuse they like for poor standards of point of sale advertising. This is why trading standards fine major retailers for incorrect pricing and make them sell the goods at such a price if it is more than just an incident of minor mispricing at branch level.The chap with the betting slip has a receipt, a written agreement that was not noticed by the betting shop as being incorrect during the course of trading so it is not covered by any terms or conditions, terms and conditions and "palpable mistakes" are designed to protect those that run on the day track side betting at race courses from fraud, they are not meant to protect an urban book makers office from entering into bets offering incorrect odds that they then decide to renage upon during the next trading day when they see the betting slip and realise that they may have offered incorrect odds.

    They owe the chap a grand, they need to pay up.”

  • Profile image for Wozzer101

    by Wozzer101

    Saturday, April 14 2012, 4:48AM

    “Everyone's a betting expert. I find it rather sad in fact, the first thing I would do if I was PM, lower VAT to 12.5% and remove it from all food, offsetting with reintroduction of a betting tax on stake of 10%.”

  • Profile image for Goach

    by Goach

    Friday, April 13 2012, 11:39PM

    “worldisflat - what you are talking about is in legal terms called "invitation to treat" however, once the contract has been entered into that argument is no longer valid, as in this case, because the money has been handed over so a valid contract has taken place. Not critisising just clearing up a point.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article