FREED TO HELP IN TERRIFYING RAID
TERRIFIED supermarket staff were "frozen to the spot" as a gang of armed raiders forced their way in brandishing weapons.
Morrisons staff had closed the store and were moving trolleys containing £14,000 of cigarettes when the raiders struck.
Manager John Quinn told how the raiders, wearing balaclavas, scarves and gloves, forced open the supermarket doors with crowbars and threatened staff with weapons.
Worker Wendy Cartlidge was treated by paramedics for breathing difficulties.
Paul Spratt, prosecuting, told Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court yesterday that the last customer had left the Leek store at 8.30pm on January 21.
He said: "Wendy Cartlidge saw two figures with crowbars. The crowbars were used to force open the locks on the main door.
"They opened the door and immediately approached the secure area.
"John Quinn described one coming through with a crowbar at waist level. He took it as a threat it would be used. Other members of staff were fearful for their own safety."
The court heard two trolleys of cigarettes were loaded into a van, which had been reversed up to the store. Other gang members helped load the van.
Mr Quinn noted the registration details of the white van and an Audi and called police.
The court heard the blue Audi was later seen by police in Endon when it crashed into a telephone junction box.
Four people got out and police caught Ian Fieldhouse after he had climbed a garden fence. The other three men escaped.
It emerged the van had been abandoned near the store and the cigarettes were recovered.
Now Fieldhouse, aged 25, of Willenhall, in the West Midlands, has been jailed for four-and-a-half years after admitting burglary on the basis that he was a lookout.
He had only been out of prison for six weeks following a four-year sentence for robberies.
Paul Cliff, mitigating, said Fieldhouse took part in the burglary to pay off a debt.
Judge Granville Styler questioned why Fieldhouse had not been charged with robbery.
He said: "You were part of a professional gang.
"This is you getting involved in division one crime and people who are prepared to do that have to realise the penalties are going to be severe."
Following yesterday's sentence, Mr Quinn said: "The staff were shook up, but all appear fine now."
A second man, Wayne Marsh, aged 27, of Wolverhampton, has been charged with burglary at the store and will appear at court on April 6.
A further three men are on police bail pending further inquiries.











11 Comments
View all
by Warren, Meir
Monday, March 15 2010, 9:28AM
“I feel for the staff involved , it must have been dreadfull for them, but you have the question work prosses hear, £14,000 of high value and easy to sell on items left in trollies, it seems to me very strange indeed. Scum like this gang will take the risk to get a hule like this. I'm glad this one got sent down, only wish it was longer, and look forword to the other scum going the same way.”
by laura, west mids
Sunday, March 14 2010, 7:09PM
“if u ask me 4 n alf yrs 4 burglary is way 2 steep wen paedophiles only get 12 months this government stinks n av got it all wrong!!!”
by Dave Cheshire, Cheshire
Sunday, March 14 2010, 12:27PM
“Ron, the police do not decide on what charges someone should be charged with, that's down to the CPS.”
by Stokie in the know, stoke
Sunday, March 14 2010, 11:57AM
“For those slating the police for charging, please be aware the CPS decide the charges for most offences nowadays particularly ones as serious as this case. For those law experts also refer to the definitions of the laws around robbery and burglary and you will find by definition it is a aggrevated burglary (which has a signficant maximum sentance). Thanks to all you armchair experts for your opinions”
by ayd, west mids
Sunday, March 14 2010, 11:12AM
“so this guy gets 4 n half years for commercial burgular not robbery,for the simple fact when the police took statements from the staff in the store they obvious didnot say or mention the masked men threatened them in any way,so thats explains why the charge of robbery was not brought to fieldhouse,they decided to charge him with commercial burgulary because of the information they recieved..but judge styler asked why?why fieldhouse wasnt charged with robbery.if he read the case properly he would no,he wanted the charge of robbery so he could give fieldhouse longer,or was it because fieldhouse was an outsider from willinhall who commitid a crime in stoke?in the same court 2 days previous a man got sentenced for breaking another mans jaw and got bound over for 8 months and a fine,o yeh he was from stoke,but 4 n half years for commercial burgulary is a joke,people get lesser sentences for child abuse,rape,mugging o.a.ps, death by dangerous driving and even manslaughter,the judges like styler let the power get to there heads if you ask me,or is it because judge styler is soon to retire and is handing out these heavy sentences?he is a joke if you ask me.if iwas fieldhouse i would appeal”