Experts back Coachmakers pubs fight

Trusted article source icon
Friday, December 05, 2008
Profile image for This is Staffordshire

This is Staffordshire

CONSERVATION and architecture groups have called on planners to save a threatened pub from the bulldozers.

English Heritage and Urban Vision North Staffordshire have joined thousands of beer fans to demand that Hanley's Coachmakers Arms remains open.

And Stoke-on-Trent City Council's archaeologist has reminded planners that the pub was previously deemed worthy of preservation.

The pub is set to be demolished to make way for a £256 million shopping and leisure development.

Although the experts back the overall development, they say the pub should be retained as an original feature.

In its response to the planning application, Urban Vision North Staffordshire accepts the reasons for the proposed demolition of the Coachmakers.

But architecture and urban design adviser Dr Darren Price added: "The panel remained unconvinced that the scheme could not in some way incorporate the pub and suggested that this might not only aid the consultation and public 'buy-in', but also provide an interesting feature of the development."

English Heritage has always refused to list the Coachmakers, despite demands from regulars.

But historic areas adviser Michael Taylor questions why Birch Terrace, which includes the Coachmakers, cannot be saved.

He said: "It is certainly desirable that people living in Stoke-on-Trent should shop in the city rather than travel elsewhere, but it is not evident to us that they will be attracted to do so by the high blank wall of the car park and department store rather than by a lively and attractive group of older buildings that give the shopping experience something distinctive to the city.

"Our recommendation is that the proposals return to the earlier stages of evolution of the masterplan and that the buildings on Birch Terrace and Lichfield Street be retained.

"We recommend that the planning application as it stands be refused."

In his response to the planning application, council archaeologist Noel Boothroyd said: "Housing and pubs within the southern part of the proposed development area are representative of the 19th century expansion of Hanley as an industrial town."

Developer Realis Estates has warned the development cannot be delivered if Birch Terrace was saved.

Realis Estates managing director Duncan Mathieson said: "Almost everyone we spoke to during our recent public exhibitions told us that the East West Centre urgently needs redeveloping and we are pleased that English Heritage, Urban Vision North Staffordshire and the city council's archaeologist share this view.

"If the redevelopment is to succeed, we need to build a vibrant new regional shopping centre that will not only help to secure the future of Stoke-on-Trent but will also benefit North Staffordshire.

"We do not believe it is possible to achieve all this on a smaller site that does not include Birch Terrace."

2
Tweet this article
Report

2 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Kerry, Stoke on Trent

    Monday, December 08 2008, 9:28AM

    “I'm sorry but I agree, This pub is stopping the building of a new centre which will bring more business and much needed jobs into the city. It is just a watering hole for people, why not go to a newer one? If they all sell beer then they all serve the same job. This is just stopping hundreds of jobs for the sake of having a pint! If it was deemed worth listig, then it wouls have been already. Personally I think it's because the staff will be out of a job that they are making such a big fuss about it. Sorry but it is time to move on”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Amy, Newcastle under Lyme

    Friday, December 05 2008, 9:55AM

    “I think we should move with the times Stoke is already behind, and plans to make the city better should be pushed forward, knock the pub down and make way for the future... sorry x”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters