Doctors braced for surge in swine flu

Trusted article source icon
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Profile image for This is Staffordshire

This is Staffordshire

MORE than 6,000 people in Stoke-on-Trent have been given Tamiflu drugs after fearing they had swine flu, according to latest figures.

But experts say four out of five of them were unlikely to be suffering from the pandemic.

Less than 10 patients have needed hospital treatment, but, after a lull during the summer holidays, NHS officials are braced for a second surge in cases over the next few months.

During the early stages of the outbreak, suspected sufferers were prescribed Tamiflu only if tests confirmed they had the virus.

But, as the bug tightened its grip, helplines were set up allowing people to obtain the drug without visiting their GP or having samples taken and investigated.

Dr Giri Rajaratnam, city public health director, pictured, said: "A number of studies elsewhere in the country show only one in five of those who felt symptoms and received Tamiflu actually had the disease.

"This was found when a sample of people contacting the helpline were followed up and given swabs to check for the presence of the virus."

He revealed health and social services in the city had developed and tested "robust plans" to cope with high sickness-absence rates caused by any second wave.

Addressing a meeting of the Local Strategic Partnership, he said: "Although it is a mild illness, children are particularly prone to it and that will mean NHS and other staff having to stay off work to care for their children at home.

"The University Hospital has therefore planned for an absence rate of between 20 and 50 per cent if things get bad.

"It should be nearer 20 per cent and, although essential services will be protected, some non-emergency services could be delayed by two or three weeks.

"The plans are to cope with a higher sickness-absence rate, lasting between two and four weeks.

"The difference between seasonal flu and swine flu is that, instead of affecting mainly the young and most vulnerable, we are all at risk. But our plans are reasonably robust and while the extreme risk is if the virus mutates, that doesn't often happen."

Dr Rajaratnam said the epidemic had peaked in the city in July and early August, before petering out, but cases had now started to rise again.

Thirty pharmacies were helping distribute Tamiflu and two special centres had been set up, with the potential to open two more.

He said a vaccine was scheduled to be issued to the NHS over the next two weeks ready to cover the whole population in a number of phases lasting a year.

The first phase would include the elderly and people with long-term illnesses, as well as all NHS and social services staff.

Read more about swine flu

7
Tweet this article
Report

7 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Roger, Staffs

    Tuesday, September 29 2009, 4:50PM

    “Remember that the World Health Organisation has been booted out of many developing nations after their "vaccines" turned out to have a sterilisation element built in.
    It's all about global depopulation folks,take the "vaccine" at your peril.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by John, Staffs

    Tuesday, September 29 2009, 3:11PM

    “Peter Radford, it is very much partly the parents fault. Gullable people swallow any scaremongering by the media, its happened before, and it will happen again. Tamiflu is more dangerous than 'swine flu' in its current state and tamilflu does not prevent swine flu anyway.

    The next wave will be people suffering SEVERE consequences due to a vaccine which is untested, and even if untested is unneccessary.

    What if swine flu mutates after a vaccine for the current strain is found?

    It's an endless game - the vaccine is lethal.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Wendy, Fenton

    Tuesday, September 29 2009, 2:20PM

    “My 18 month was told she had swine flu, after seeing a doctor, i got tammi flu but never gave it to her. Instead i called for an ambulance has she had difficulty breathing, it turns out she had croupe ??

    Im discussed that i could have been giving her something she never needed. !!”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by L.J., Hartshill

    Tuesday, September 29 2009, 1:04PM

    “No such "misdiagnosis" occurred because diagnosis by phone is neither legal nor possible (you are even told this when they answer the phone, and who to call if symptoms change or worsen). The National Pandemic Flu Service is all about probability because it's the best way of distributing mortality-reducing drugs to those in need when an epidemic threatens to break out and inundate available resources. Such imperfect systems rely on the judgement of patients as much as the telephonists evaluating the symptoms they're being told about.

    If it was a perfect world things would be different, but sadly it's not, nor will it ever be.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Peter Radford, Chesterton

    Tuesday, September 29 2009, 10:27AM

    “We rang the emergency Flu helpline when my youngest son became ill, shortly after the summer holidays began. He was prescribed with Tamiflu, 2 days later he was at the doctors confirmed he was ill with Tonsilitus.

    It's not the parents who are to blame its the system on how easily patients are misdiagnosed without seeing a doctor.”

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article