David Elks: Where are the parking ticket hotspots in Stoke-on-Trent?
IF THERE’S one job guaranteed to wind up motorists, it’s the humble traffic warden.
They are dubbed jobsworths, accused of zealous ticketing tactics and even occasionally end up on the wrong end of attacks from motorists unhappy with discovering a penalty note on the windscreen.
-

Even so, they play a vital role for councils in making sure motorists obey parking regulations. Or do they? Some might say there are financial incentives for wardens in reaching quotas and do little else than penalise people who often find they’ve been forced to park in the wrong place, or stay a few minutes too long.
No matter your perspective, the city council revealed a significant insight into the changing strategy in targeting illegally-parked vehicles in a document published under the Freedom of Information Act.
Hotpoint HUE61P
60cm electric double oven
Ceramic Hob
Timer
AA rated
ONLY 459.90 and thats delivered Fast & free rom our vast warehouse stocks
Why not visit our Longton cooker centre for a look
Terms:
The best deal is on your doorstep - only condition is you have to be prepaired to shop locally, supporting a local firm and live within 25 miles of one of our branches
How good is that?
Contact: 01782 342609
Valid until: Sunday, June 02 2013
The spreadsheet report, published on the website WhatDoTheyKnow.com, gives a breakdown of the number of penalty tickets issued, paid, cancelled and outstanding between 2008 and September 2012.
Although there are general nuggets that can be gleaned by scanning the whole report, there is simply too much information for anyone to work with.
For instance, it’s possible to work out that 120,471 tickets have been issued. It’s also possible to note there was a 14 per cent increase in the number of tickets issued in 2011 compared to 2008.
But it’s only when you map the data that certain other trends become apparent.
It’s a fairly straightforward, process to clean up the data into a form which the public might understand.
First we had to pull the data into a single data table. I then found a location for each data point by using another dataset from the Ordnance Survey providing the location of roads in the UK. This information, which uses traditional easting and northing coordinates, then had to be converted to latitudes and longitude measures.
Each coordinate circle is then sized against the relative increase in number of tickets issued over the period, with those with the largest increases having a larger diameter than those where more tickets have increased. To add further detail, I’ve then marked all sites where the number of tickets has increased between 2008 and 2011 in red, and marked them blue where the number of tickets has fallen.
What becomes clear is a change in focus by the wardens. Large sections of the city map have blue rings, denoting areas such as side roads where the number of tickets issued have fallen. Instead the wardens have concentrated on the city centre.
In particular, there have been dramatic rises in tickets issued in Huntbach Street, which saw tickets issued rise a 4,000 per cent from 111 in 2008 to 4,699 last year.
This change in focus is even more apparent if you focus on the top 10 places where tickets have been issued over the full years of 2008 through to 2011.
In 2008 and 2009, Stafford Street topped the hotspot list, but none of the 10 listed hit the 1,000 mark.
Contrast that to 2010 and 2011 where three of the top 10 sites had more than 1,000 tickets issued.
When we first reported the figures last month, Councillor Ruth Rosenau, cabinet member for regeneration, planning and transportation, argued against accusations it was just a revenue-generating drive. Instead, she said the city centre attracted more motorists and pedestrians therefore demanded further enforcement.
Interestingly, the Highways Agency has been producing a national dataset of every accident reported since 2006. If we look at the number of accidents in an area bounded by the ring road we find there were 119 accidents last year, compared with 98 in 2010 and 41 in 2008.
That’s not to suggest a link between tickets issued and the number of accidents, but it’s clear the Government’s drive to make data more available allows the public more opportunities to analyse what councils are doing.




Comments
by Partyon
Wednesday, December 12 2012, 10:28AM
“Would be interesting to overlay a map of failed businesses, such as newsagents and corner shops, whose trade was hit by drivers going straight past to the nearest supermarket with a free car park.”
by bobble1956
Wednesday, December 12 2012, 8:55AM
“When yellow lines were first introduced their idea was simply to stop road users causing an obstruction. They quickly became a method to stop parking in towns and cities to force people to use revenue making car parks. To put it simply yellow lines are an abuse of their own principle. Will things ever return to how they should be? No chance. As long as there is a chance of making money then things will remain as they are. However yellow lines do have to meet a strict criteria for example they must be unbroken and terminate with "T" bars. However I do thing that inconsiderate parking is a menace that should be dealt with.”
by Backdoored
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 10:50PM
“The introduction of the 'double yellow lines' -has since proved to serve as a great employment booster. (more than whose job's worth?)”
by Backdoored
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 10:46PM
“by hardnose
"I,ve never had but I,m not "potteries"" ...UNQUOTE.
Try " I've....And I'm " -And don't forget the apple.
PS -the apostrophe is on the same key as the @ sign.”
by ravo1972
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 9:17PM
“elksie You have passed the audition to replace the guy in Yes Prime Minister.”
by yamahaman
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 5:58PM
“The parking situation in Tunstall is beyond a joke, the enforcement of parking restrictions which are out of date, and do not relate to the current situation, is nothing more than another nail in the coffin of the town. When there is a national push to retain town centres there is a need to entice folks into the towns not drive them away.
In Tunstall there is little short term parking available. The Tower square has shops which depend on the quick nip in and out shopper. Why can't there be some common sense from the council, the waiting , unloading restrictions are a farce but provide an easy target to raise cash.Is it really such a crime to nip into the pie shop for two minutes.
It will be no use moaning about town centres becoming waste grounds, if you don't use it you will loose it. They will be issuing fines for walking on the cracks next.”
by elksie
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 5:27PM
“Matt, unfortunately there was no breakdown although that might be worth adding into a future FOI. Guess it might not be logged with the penalty information.”
by WebMonkey1
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 3:16PM
“Great maps Dave, very useful info. Did you data tell you how much revenue came from Parking Monitor vehicle and how much came from foot patrols?
Tunstall: Not shocked by Tower Square in Tunstall. There is so little quick stop parking it's a joke.
http://tinyurl.com/6tc8eay
But then again if new plans were put in place there'd be no need to penalise the motorist and it would benfit the shop keeper and the shopper. (Not like this council are interested in trade and commerce or the peoples needs) http://tinyurl.com/cfn5jkz”
by hardnose
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 12:29PM
“I,ve never had a parking fine,that might be because I use a designated car park,and pay the fee,but I,m not "potteries"”
by InsiderOut
Tuesday, December 11 2012, 9:34AM
“This report should have been titled "Where are the illegal parking hotspots in Stoke-on-Trent?" Don't break the law - don't get the ticket!”