County council pays out £565k for staff leaving schools

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

A SPATE of teachers retiring early and taking redundancy has left council bosses facing a shock bill of more than £500,000.

Schools across Staffordshire have made more redundancies and accepted more early retirements in 2011/12 than Staffordshire County Council expected.

The authority has no control over school salaries or staffing decisions, but it is responsible for funding and covering the cost of school redundancy and retirement payouts.

The budget used to cover such costs is set to be £565,000 overspent as a result of the departures, which the council has blamed on financial pressures at the county's schools.

Figures show the total bill for redundancies at schools in Staffordshire could rise to more than £9 million by 2017.

County Councillor Liz Staples, cabinet member for education and skills, pictured right, said: "The schools' premature retirement budget has a £565,000 pressure as a result of higher numbers of school staff taking premature retirement or redundancy.

"Schools may need to do this for a number of reasons, including falling school pupil numbers or financial pressures.

"This financial year has seen a higher than budgeted number of premature retirements and redundancies, mainly due to school reorganisations and the ending of the school sports partnership grant."

The figures were discussed by the Conservative-run authority's cabinet at a meeting yesterday.

Council leader Philip Atkins said: "There is pressure on the budget from premature retirements. We pick up the early retirements from schools.

"It's a case where somebody else makes a decision and shunts the cost on to us. It's something we have tried to avoid."

The news comes after opposition councillors last week called on the authority to use £846,000 in savings to cancel new travel charges for college and sixth form students.

Those changes, which were approved despite the bid to stop them, will save £300,000 next year and £600,000-per-year when they are rolled out to 1,300 youngsters.

Speaking about the £565,000 overspend, Christina Jebb, leader of the opposition Liberal Democrats, said: "I'm disappointed to learn they are faced with a challenge which is not of their own making.

"But they refused to accept our amendment on the transport charges and so they could probably fund it from that.

"I sympathise that they have to find the money for this, but we identified more than they will need."

The county council's 2012/13 budget will see savings of £25 million, as part of plans to claw back £120 million over four years.

8
Tweet this article
Report

8 Comments

  • Profile image for gcr321

    by gcr321

    Thursday, February 23 2012, 7:14PM

    “Staff Leaving Schools- get the truancy officer after them, poor examples. SCC need to do a bit more praying, perhaps we can hold a collection tin during Cab.Meets”

  • Profile image for NOONESHOME

    by NOONESHOME

    Friday, February 17 2012, 12:03AM

    “Mediamania.I suppose you will be coming out with the usual drivel of, "we pay more into our pension fund so we can retire eary",Wrong!! the tax payer pays more into your fund so you can retire early,so please keep your pompous mundane drivel to yourself,and do not be so condecending. Typical public sector worker.”

  • Profile image for mediamaniaX

    by mediamaniaX

    Thursday, February 16 2012, 10:08PM

    “No one is really home!!! Educate yourself around the vast difference in public sector pensions before sharing your ill informed view point!”

  • Profile image for lady44

    by lady44

    Thursday, February 16 2012, 8:22PM

    “nice that you can away to france some of us cant even do that nooneshome”

  • Profile image for NOONESHOME

    by NOONESHOME

    Thursday, February 16 2012, 7:47PM

    “soxandpants."They cannot cope with the demands of working at 65". When was the last time that anyone in the public sector worked till 65. It is a question if any of these "hard working" jobs for life brigade have worked till they were 60. As for the Teachers,this £565000 pay out will only pay off probably ten teachers,( if we are lucky).Why do they not have a minimum age for retirement of, lets be generous and say 60.Why should the people in the private sector,(who pay for all the public sector pensions) have to work to minimum 65. any pensions that are funded by the tax payer whether it be Police,Fireman,council,Teachers etc, should have a minimum age to retire.I am sick to death of meeting retired teachers in France, let them work to a decent retirement age like everyone else.”

  • Profile image for soxsandpants

    by soxsandpants

    Thursday, February 16 2012, 12:46PM

    “I can't understand why the surprise. This was the warning from all unions that there would be a large number taking early retirement before they are forced to work until 68. The next thing you will see is the surprise that large numbers of staff are on long term sick leave as they can no longer physically or mentally cope with the demands of the job post 65”

  • Profile image for BobThorn

    by BobThorn

    Thursday, February 16 2012, 11:21AM

    “It's a tough life being a teacher. Short days, great holidays and the chance to retire early. Wot's the saying: those who can do, those who can't, become lazy teachers.

    Don't fancy the job, mind. I hate children.”

  • Profile image for yesamwargames

    by yesamwargames

    Thursday, February 16 2012, 10:09AM

    “After paying these sums out they will re-employ them part time for more money than they got full time.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters