Councillor Paul Breeze pledges to join City Independents in time for election
A CITY councillor has announced that he will stand at the next election for a new party.
Unaffiliated councillor Paul Breeze, of Hanley, told how he will run as a City Independent at elections in 2015.
-

NEW STAND: Paul Breeze.
Councillor Breeze whose ward covers Birches Head and Central Forest Park announced his intention at the full council budget meeting on Thursday night.
He told The Sentinel that his intention meant he could now stand alongside other members to oppose Labour.
Panasonic Store Camera•20x Optical Zoom LEICA DC Lens from 24mm...
View details
What Digital camera Gold award winning DMCTZ40
SAVE £20 off our store price ONLY with this voucher
Plus you can also claim a SD card or spare battery
Choice of colours, free parking behind store
Terms: Print this voucher and hand in at Panasonic Store Hanley to save £20 off our store price ONLY £269.90
Contact: 01782 342609
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Councillor Breeze said: "At the next election it is my intention to stand as a non-party-political City Independent under the leadership of Dave Conway.
"And in partnership with Stoke-on-Trent people crying out for honesty, scrutiny, integrity, openness and transparency.
"I will not be accountable to a national party, or secretive regional and local party politics, blindly and pathetically following my party whips.
"But acting solely for and accountable to the genuine proud people of Stoke-on-Trent in the communities we are elected to serve."
Mr Breeze has been a harsh critic of the council telling leader Mohammed Pervez that "you speculatively borrow millions of pounds in unprecedented austere times."
He has also spoken out against the council's decision not to sell land to the Capital Potteries Shopping Centre.
He added: "They offer £180,000 immediately transforming the miserable northern city centre gateway to create construction jobs then permanent jobs and bring in business rates. You refuse which is absolutely unbelievable."




8 Comments
by Anna224
Friday, March 08 2013, 12:40PM
“Paul - I can only compliment you on saying that I feel that you are one of "You People" (ie the true people of Stoke on Trent) and have felt moved by your efforts in opposing the dictatorship of Pervez, it must be so frustrating for you.
Please continue the fight on our behalf and let your integrity be an example to the cowardly labour concillors who are towing their party Whip - thereby denying represtation of the ones who voted them. The Whip is not a democratic tool - it serves the party not the electorate.
Hopefully, come the next election the Gang of 10 will not be returned to office. Good Luck.”
by GOLUM
Friday, March 08 2013, 12:48AM
“The balance of power needs redressing ,familiarity breeds contempt. I urge everyone to exercise their right to vote. People have given their lives for this right, and are still doing so in many parts of the world.Look beyond the rosette.”
by captain-swing
Sunday, March 03 2013, 9:55AM
“Medea and Backdoored make very important points. However, what the City Labhour leadership (and other major party leaderships) have done and are doing goes against their own party's best aims. All main party leaders, for instance, have spoken favourably about the seminal 'Spirit Level' book which demonstrates that the widening gap between rich and poor is, quite literally, unhealthy for our society - and every other society.
Yet, we have the grotesque City CEO salary situation roundly condemned in a Sentinel poll last week by over 90%.
Hence, the case for continued and immediate challenge by 'March on Stoke' and the unions to the City MPs and direct to Ed Millinand about what's being done in Stoke in their Party's name.
Captain Swing”
by I_Norris
Saturday, March 02 2013, 3:36PM
“FFDP1: yes anyone can stand as an unaffiliated council candidate but if you then wish to be represented and sit on any of the committees you need to be part of a group (crazy part of the council constitution that should be removed if possible) on occasion if there is a spare seat it may be offered to an unaffiliated council member but it is at the discretion of the leading group who or where the spare seat is offered.”
by mole10
Saturday, March 02 2013, 12:18PM
“All serious onlookers should ask what Duncan Walker did with his vote.
Too many rumours are doing the rounds suggesting that jobs were being bandied around during a beano to Prague, recently.
This means someone's getting the sack.
So who did accompany our former beloved Mayor to Prague?
And if you changed your mind and voted the Pervez way, why did you do it?
You were going to walk out of the Labour Group and walk ot of Labour altogether.
In fact, naughty rumours suggested a legal challenge to the Labour Party on some issue or other.
What changed, apart from nothing?
It doesn't fit.
If they don't back down, you walk.
If they do back down, you stay.
?????”
by FFDP1
Saturday, March 02 2013, 10:09AM
“Cop out, you can stand against anyone as a unaffiliated council member. To my reckoning the only thing Conway leads is the rush to the door at fag break time. That's the problem round hear, call yourself an Independent then join a group and get whipped like we saw a certain ex lord mayor do to a lady council member on 'The Year The Two Hall Srunk'.”
by Backdoored
Saturday, March 02 2013, 9:39AM
“Who's going to stand for Pervez's seat in 2015? Assuming he's still sitting in it 'til then....? Will it be a 'March On Stoke' -candidate? Or will UKIP make a move for that one? -a bare knuckle job.
Or is Pervez 'King of his own Castle' -untouchable in his Constituency? If someone individual or some Party did oppose him on his 'own ground'... -at grass roots level, then that would put the cat among the pigeons and 'open up the debate' FULL ON. Who dares wins!”
by Medea
Saturday, March 02 2013, 8:52AM
“Thanks for your efforts on Thursday night Paul. Your speech was excellent despite the attempts of the Chair to put you off. The meeting was a travesty of democracy and amply demonstrates the contempt that the party politicians have for the local population.”