Council under pressure to cut long grass left to grow at sites across Stoke-on-Trent
WIDOWER Frederick Cotton has been forced to buy his own strimmer to cut back knee-high grass around relatives' graves – after nearly £50,000 was wiped from a maintenance budget for public spaces.
Mr Cotton, aged 81, has spent hours tidying up the resting place of both his wife and son at Longton Cemetery.
-

‘IT’S DISGRACEFUL’: Frederick Cotton at Longton Cemetery.
He is among scores of residents putting mounting pressure on the cash-strapped city council to tend to the 'forgotten' site and many more across the Potteries.
Dozens of cemeteries, playgrounds, roadsides and parks in Stoke-on-Trent have been left unchecked for months due to council austerity measures – turning public areas into what residents have dubbed 'urban jungles'.
Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk
View detailsOur heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.
Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk
Contact: 01858 468192
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Retired builder Mr Cotton, of Martindale Close, Meir, said: "It's a disgrace – I had no choice but to take matters into my own hands. The grass has been left to grow and grow over the last few years. It's as though the council has just forgotten about the cemetery.
"It is so disrespectful to the dead and their families who visit them."
Mr Cotton's wife Joyce was buried in the cemetery 30 years ago and his son Paul was laid to rest two years ago after he died aged 55.
He added: "We can't continue the work forever and, at the end of the day, it's the council's responsibility.
"It has been really upsetting because we have a lot of family members buried there."
Stoke-on-Trent City Council's budgets for green space and waste collection have been cut by £3 million in recent years.
And the authority slashed its £202,000 budget for grass cutting and open space maintenance by £46,000 this year with the loss of two jobs.
Peter Dartford, Chief Officer at Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service, said there was a real danger of a small grassland fire spreading dangerously quickly if the grass was left to grow.
He said he was monitoring the situation before deciding whether or not the matter should be taken up with the council.
Mr Dartford, below, added: "There is no doubt that there is a risk there. If worst came to worst we could raise that issue directly with them as a particular area of concern."
Hardial Bhogal, the council's director of city renewal, said: "The council has worked very hard to strike a balance between maintaining grass cutting arrangements, against very tough budget cuts imposed centrally, by government.
"Council staff continue to cut grass at play areas, sports pitches, grass verges, strategic and neighbourhood parks, council bungalows and flats on a regular basis."
Angry families tell council: 'Enough is enough': Page 6




Comments
by Armagedon
Saturday, September 08 2012, 10:01PM
“Sheep in the cemetaries too by the look of it. Many rural churches use this method of keeping the grass down.”
by gormhenghast
Wednesday, September 05 2012, 2:43PM
“A Council can be judged by the way it cares for its assets, performance indices in modern parlance.
Stoke excels in the way it abuses its heritage, unless of course the ever present threat of investors are spotted on the horizon, then like Barons of old out comes the red carpet, the receptions, the discussions and of course the obligatory troughs, oft seen hanging around Councillors necks like medals of honour, awaiting the latest refill.
Coming back to the abuse of heritage, most of the green spaces that are now neglected were created as a result of the regeneration of pit banks and marl holes. Now we have not useful areas for the enjoyment of the residents but pleasing natural areas that some twit has decided that it attracts wildlife. Well, there is credence in this theory, but having visited Tunstall this morning I am at a loss as to what sort of wildlife will make use of the hanging gardens on the Market Hall, or Town Hall and Library.
Wildlife needs ground in which to burrow etc to exist on these vast savannah`s that same twit has created around the City, some inclusive of gravestones. Hartshill Cemetery the Chapel there is a grade 2 listed building, without a roof that has collapsed, the bypass around Hanley with lovely shrub-beds can be seen at night moving, the wildlife is present, even the local Owls avoid that vermin, and as for wildlife destruction, how many geese have we shot???
Its a false economy not to maintain these areas, and its also time that the Council actually honoured some of the commitments to the City`s Open Spaces that it has reneged on, that is of course having pocketed the cash, such as the Festival park, the jungle that was created, the woodland walks etc can hardly be called woodland, you were given monies to instigate a thinning programme, following the planting of rare and expensive trees, which trough swallowed that grant up.
As for a Chief Executive that cares, well trees don't grow in the surf, neither do Marl Holes, **** tips, or Pit Banks, by comparison Van der Laughing Stocks Surf City in Devon from whence he came is gorgeous, and when are you going back there???? Surfs up!!!”
by GilbertL
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 3:59PM
“One area of open space in Tunstall has been cut, thoroughly and completely today. Let's hope this is the start of the council cutting all areas of open space, and I don't mean just as the final cut of the season either Mr Craig Howell of Stoke-on-Trent City Council..”
by mole10
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 10:10AM
“This is the worst Labour Council I have ever seen.
Bought and paid for by an office clerk in Sandwell, West midlands.”
by LabourLen
Tuesday, September 04 2012, 9:50AM
“@truestokie says: "Could not agree more with all the comments on here.
This shows the feelings of tax-payers against the tax-imposers.
They want to provide no services but have the same money from the tax-payers.
Who voted this bunch of jackboot thugs in?"
The electorate voted in a Labour majority in Terry that's who.
And let's look at the alternatives shall we?
a) The Tories - The enemy of the common people and the squeezed middle. Let us not forget that this ConDem government is passing on billions of pounds worth of cuts to local authorities which is forcing local councils to pass on the cuts to you and me. And before Terry or his new bessie mate Elsby say that it was all Labour's fault, remember the global financial meltdown? Labour were not in power in the USA and the rest of mainland Europe.
b) The Libdems - Wiped out of the council chamber in 2011 and why? Because the betrayed every person who voted for them on their election manifesto promises of cutting tuition fees only to see them play a huge part in trebling them. That's just one example of their deception, there are many more.
c) The City independents? Lost all their credibility when they joined a coalition with the Tories to run the council and guess what? They cut, cut, cut and claimed that they had no choice as difficult decisions had to be made. They then went into a 4way coalition so that their former leader could cling on to some power. The CIG were instrumental in the biggest cuts during 2010. They have opportunities to call in contentious decisions like CBD but haven't so far are they really the public saviours?
They claim to be 'independent' - but independent of who/what?
What Terry wants to do is to brain wash you into turning to his beloved far right - yes the BNP. Let us not forget that their current leader is in court this very day facing charges of incitement. Just what did the BNP ever do for this city? Their record was judged and voted on by the people of this great city. The result? They are without representation in the council chamber and have lost their most hardened supporter in Steve Batkin.
You keep trying Terry, one day you'll find out that the folk of this city aren't as thick as you think they are.”
by SCFC4EVA
Monday, September 03 2012, 9:58PM
“living wage ??? what is that ?”
by Redtone
Monday, September 03 2012, 8:11PM
“SCFC4EVA - living wage anyone?”
by SCFC4EVA
Monday, September 03 2012, 7:59PM
“god forbid the locals would all chip in with some volunteer work and help clean a few of those places up every now and then !!
community spirit anyone ?”
by truestokie
Monday, September 03 2012, 7:30PM
“Could not agree more with all the comments on here.
This shows the feelings of tax-payers against the tax-imposers.
They want to provide no services but have the same money from the tax-payers.
Who voted this bunch of jackboot thugs in?”
by Mr_Jingles
Monday, September 03 2012, 7:29PM
“Well, well want a laughing stock this City Council is becoming. On one hand tells us that it wants investment in the city, then goes and dashes everything for the sake of trying to save a few pounds, how short sighted. In the long run it will lose millions. What business would ever want to come to a rundown unkempt City like this? Verges, open spaces, and parks, cemeteries, hedges and trees etc, all neglected and making the city look disowned. Does this city council honestly believe any entrepreneur would want to come here, it look that though no one cares.
City Council note we the tax payers all care, this is where we live not in some snooty mansion on the outskirt villages.
This is also double standards, how can the city council tell its housing tenants to maintain their gardens when it cannot even get its own house in order.
It looks like this council is letting the grass row under its feet, rumor has it that a herd of elephants were last seen in the long grass making their way to the Civic Centre.”