'Council mag in breach of rules'
OPPOSITION councillors have lodged a complaint with the Government over claims strict rules on political promotion in the build-up to a by-election were breached.
They say Labour-run Stoke-on-Trent City Council distributed copies of its glossy self-promotion magazine Our City at the same time as candidates were campaigning for the vacant Springfields and Trent Vale seat.
City Independent councillor Jackie Barnes claimed a surprise victory in the battle to replace former Labour councillor Sarah Hill, who quit the authority after losing her role as a cabinet member.
But the group claims the council should have been following 'Purdah' rules which forbid publications or announcements which could benefit any candidate in the run-up to an election.
Purchase this property and receive £250 towards legal fees !! New on the market with no vendor chain !
http://www.bobgutteridge.co.uk/index.php?id=24247156
Terms: Subject to offer and terms and conditions, contact the office for further information.
Contact: 01782 940925
Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013
Now they have written to Communities Secretary Eric Pickles to formally complain and request his department investigates whether rules have been broken.
The council insists residents should not have started receiving copies of the magazine until July 26, the day of the election, and said distribution did not start in the election ward until after the vote.
But Mrs Barnes, of Trent Vale, said: "I received my copy before the election. I remember it arriving because it's the first one I'd actually had for 12 months. I also remember a friend of mine from Penkhull brought a copy over and she had jokingly stuck a little photograph of me next to the empty space for Springfields and Trent Vale."
Group leader Dave Conway said: "It was full of nothing but fantastic news. It might as well have been an election leaflet. If we had put out our own glossy leaflet explaining what the City Independents want to do we would have had to declare it in our election expenses.
"But they used council money to put Labour spin through the letterboxes."
The July edition included a series of photographs and articles promoting the work of Labour cabinet members. It featured an article which 'sugar-coated' the council's controversial plans to relocate 1,300 office staff from Stoke to a new £40 million HQ in Hanley.
Council leader Mohammed Pervez later admitted controversy surrounding the move was a key factor in Labour's defeat.
The article, under the headline 'Plans in the pipeline for big Stoke boost', referred to 'massive redevelopment' and 'job creation' in the town but made no reference to a campaign against the relocation – or the loans of up to £59 million to facilitate it.
A city council spokesman said: "Distribution did not begin in the Springfields and Trent Vale area until the week of July 30, the week after the by-election. Our City is published as a non-political magazine. Its aim is not to influence voters but instead to provide factual information."






Comments
by Notanumber
Monday, September 17 2012, 1:09PM
“What else could we expect from a banana Republic here on our very own doorstep?”
by truestokie
Monday, September 17 2012, 12:07PM
“Camband, don't forget about "Westcliffe Hospital" and the stench surrounding that.”
by mole10
Monday, September 17 2012, 11:14AM
“Remember when they attempted to close some of the childrens centres?
Protesters stopped them from doing so.
Then what?
The glossy mag ran stories of how proud they were of all the centres.
It's a con.
The accusation of political corruption has not gone away.
A re-run of the election is necessary and democracy must be seen to be done.”
by Nicky_Davis_
Sunday, September 16 2012, 11:07PM
“I'm glad they've complained. It's a disgrace this Labour propaganda is allowed and worse that our council tax is squandered on it. All the cuts Labour are inflicting but they won't cut 'Our City', no that has to be a priority for them.
A lot of disagreement there about when the magazine was delivered!
It will be interesting to see how this pans out.”
by papalazaroo
Sunday, September 16 2012, 11:11AM
“"Ah, yes, without question my favourite magazine; soft, strong and thoroughly absorbent..."”
by camband
Sunday, September 16 2012, 10:54AM
“By Dizzy1960
"Corruptness within our Schity City Council. NEVER?" UNQUOTE.
Every time I see the words 'corruption and city council -I automatically 'think' -Dimensions. And so it will ever be -until the truth is finally revealed..... which, one day, one fine day -'it must come out' -if this Council is ever going to rid itself of the image of it being 'a morally bankrupt administration' -and as such, with no confidence it it from the people.
They need to come clean on such as 'Dimensions' and the 'Modwen Victoria Ground' cover-up, wash away their sins in public -and give us back local democracy.”
by johnwhite18
Saturday, September 15 2012, 5:52AM
“Don't run a re ran Barnes got in by miles last time so no point in re run and ending up with a big bill to play”
by Jolyteddy
Friday, September 14 2012, 11:01PM
“Well Eric Pickles didn't answer my email about the council's wasting of money on the move to Hanley.”
by mainstar
Friday, September 14 2012, 10:21PM
“But they used council money to put Labour spin through the letterboxes.
Bit like the TV license and the BBC.”
by mole10
Friday, September 14 2012, 6:18PM
“I think that the election should be re-run.
We don't want Stoke to be put in a bad light do we?”