Council jobs threat worse than feared

Trusted article source icon
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Profile image for This is Staffordshire

This is Staffordshire

MORE than 240 staff at a newly-formed council could lose their jobs under major restructuring plans.

Cheshire East Council has identified 241 employees who are facing redundancy or redeployment within months.

A report to the council's cabinet said the authority had been working on the restructuring plans since it took over from Cheshire County Council and the area's borough councils in April.

Head of human resources and organisations development Paul Bradshaw said it was initially thought 135 redundancies would be made.

But he has now revealed that 241 workers are directly affected by the plans.

Most of the jobs are back office roles, including IT staff.

But the figure also includes staff at a nursery and a community centre.

The authority has already approved 44 voluntary redundancies at a cost of £2.78 million, and has enough reserves to fund another 101.

But it estimates that between 96 and 111 employees will have to face either redeployment or compulsory redundancy.

And those who are redeployed could still be at risk, as they can be dismissed without redundancy pay-outs if they fail to perform in their new roles.

Mr Bradshaw said in the report: "Inevitably as the council develops new fit-for-purpose structures, within the available budgetary provision, a number of employees will be displaced and their employment will come to be at risk.

"The council supports employees in this situation by seeking to redeploy them.

"Immediately issuing compulsory redundancy notices would adversely affect the council in that we would lose skilled staff we could otherwise have retained, potentially harm the public perception of the council and also result in additional financial implications."

Congleton Town West ward member councillor Roland Domleo said he hoped the majority of staff whose jobs were threatened could be retrained.

He said: "As we continue to merge the three previous council functions, there will be job losses.

"The council is very keen to put those for whom there is no post into a redeployment pool and to see if there is another job they could be trained to do.

"The staff and the trade unions know what is happening and they have been aware of this from the beginning.

"This is the way that the Government wanted to do things in order to make sure that we become more efficient and provide better services with a lower council tax."

The restructuring proposals will be discussed by cabinet members at a meeting on Tuesday.

8
Tweet this article
Report

8 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Ray, Stoke

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 11:32PM

    “Assuming that Cheshire East Council is run as well as Stoke Council you could save a fortune in redundancy payments by simply sacking two thirds of your staff for being incompetent.

    Before you say it...

    You are welcome, i like to do my bit.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Ric, Stoke

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 4:35PM

    “Roland Domleo talks about merging the functions of three councils. Congelton, Macclesfield, Crewe & Nantwich and Cheshire county total four councils. Get it right.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by J W, Crewe

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 4:18PM

    “"The staff and the trade unions know what is happening and they have been aware of this from the beginning."

    I am one of the staff and we have not been told anything!”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by gaz, stafford

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 3:49PM

    “sack em all and give em an asbo.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by John, NEWCASTLE

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 2:18PM

    “Councils will never be any good while they told what they will do by overpaid officers.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Lee, Longton

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 12:03PM

    “44 voluntary redundancies at a cost of £2.78 million??. That works out at an average £63000 for each person. If they weren't paying out such stupid amounts in an attempt to get people to quit then they might not have to loose any jobs at all.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by R, Staffordshire

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 11:31AM

    “What a sneaky way to deprive someone of their rightful redundancy pay. "Redeploy" them to a job different to the one they have done for years then sack them without compensation if they can't do it properly. Absolutely disgraceful.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Steve, Longton

    Wednesday, September 30 2009, 10:54AM

    “If this were a process involved in banking then someone would be picking up a huge bonus for making these tough decisions and having to suffer a bleeding heart.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters