Cost of police election deters Staffordshire's independent candidates claim critics

Trusted article source icon
Monday, September 10, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

INDEPENDENT candidates are being excluded from the race to take charge of Staffordshire's police force because of the high cost of the deposit, it has been claimed.

Elections on November 15 will see 41 police and crime commissioners chosen in England and Wales to oversee force budgets and policies.

Candidates are required to place a deposit of £5,000 to stand for the role – 10 times the amount stipulated in parliamentary elections – which is only refunded if they poll at least five per cent of the total vote.

Circulating election literature comprehensively across both Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire is likely to cost a further £10,000.

Cheap Van Insurance For 17,18 & 19 Year Old Drivers - Call...

Insure365

View details

Print voucher

Cheap Van Insurance For 17,18 & 19 Year Old Drivers - Call Insure365 01782 898188, Free Legal Protection Cover Included valued at £25.00!

Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer

Contact: 01782 898188

Valid until: Monday, June 24 2013

Critics say high costs are leading to fears about the politicisation of policing becoming a reality amid a shortage of independent candidates.

In Staffordshire, city councillor Joy Garner is representing Labour, and county councillor Matthew Ellis is standing for the Conservative party.

The poll currently looks set to remain a two-horse race.

Councillor Dave Conway, leader of the opposition City Independents group on Stoke-on-Trent City Council, believes independent candidates are being priced out of the poll.

He said: "I would have loved to have put somebody forward as a candidate.

"It is just unrealistic to be expected to find that amount of money without the backing of a big party. It is a very unfair system."

The number of independent candidates nationally is not yet known as formal nominations do not open until October 8.

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for truestokie

    by truestokie

    Monday, September 10 2012, 11:07PM

    “I trust this election to be straight as much as I would trust any of the elections held in this city.
    The phrase "bent as a nine bob note" comes to mind here.
    Its a fact political party's in England are nothing but hotbeds of corruption and slime.
    This will be no different.
    The police will be bought and paid for with party money.”

  • Profile image for Nicky_Davis_

    by Nicky_Davis_

    Monday, September 10 2012, 2:22PM

    “It's a disgrace but I'm not surprised. All the talk that these elected positions will allow capable independent candidates to put themselves forward is complete guff. This was always going to be a mechanism of political party dominance over more aspects of our lives, very thinly disguised as some sort of democracy. I've heard very little of substance from either of these candidates, just tired old shallow cliches. Joy Garner says she'll oppose police cuts, but there's little credibility in that given she sits there on SOT City Council voting through no end of other cuts that severely impact on people. Matthew Ellis wants to cut down on paperwork etc. Yes I want police on the streets, ideally rounding up all the drug dealers and stopping cigarettes and alcohol getting to underage teens. But there needs to be some 'paperwork' or at least computer filework. Police should act but there has to be accountability, there needs to be records, to protect possibly innocent members of the public and police officers alike and assess effectiveness of police work. Is there any point voting? Well, I'll vote, it may be a spoilt ballot or I may figure out the least bad option. I think it's worth turning out to vote, a large number of spoilt ballots would signal lack of confidence of the public in the system or candidates.”

  • Profile image for BucknallMel

    by BucknallMel

    Monday, September 10 2012, 2:15PM

    “The best way to protest this is to go along and write None of the Above across the ballot paper. If we do this in our thousands, and inform the press of it, we might get our point across.”

  • Profile image for truestokie

    by truestokie

    Monday, September 10 2012, 12:34PM

    “Hardnose, and Dizzy 1960 spot on.
    Labour voted against this post, which just goes to show what hypocrites they are, and whoever gets in will screw the expenses rotten.
    It will cost the tax-payer millions.”

  • Profile image for hardnose

    by hardnose

    Monday, September 10 2012, 12:13PM

    “Well said by Dizzy 1960,The person to take charge of the police,is called a Chief Constable,not some lefty councilor who would allow the low life that roam our streets,get away with murder,”

  • Profile image for mole10

    by mole10

    Monday, September 10 2012, 11:29AM

    “Undoubtedly, we will vote in an unnecessary candidate into an unnecessary job and Labour's candidate fits this description perfectly.”

  • Profile image for strandedhere

    by strandedhere

    Monday, September 10 2012, 11:11AM

    “Spread over a year,that comes to about 300 pounds a week to stand as a candidate,plus loss of earnings.”

  • Profile image for Dizzy1960

    by Dizzy1960

    Monday, September 10 2012, 11:06AM

    “So the people of Stoke-on-Trent will have to choose between a LabRat or ConArtist for Police Commissioner and with the assistance of the Corrupt Prosecution Service our council's illegal dealings will be kept well under wraps.

    Of cause it's undemocratic. But when has this city being any different?”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article