Cost of police election deters Staffordshire's independent candidates claim critics
INDEPENDENT candidates are being excluded from the race to take charge of Staffordshire's police force because of the high cost of the deposit, it has been claimed.
Elections on November 15 will see 41 police and crime commissioners chosen in England and Wales to oversee force budgets and policies.
Candidates are required to place a deposit of £5,000 to stand for the role – 10 times the amount stipulated in parliamentary elections – which is only refunded if they poll at least five per cent of the total vote.
Circulating election literature comprehensively across both Stoke-on-Trent and Staffordshire is likely to cost a further £10,000.
Cheap Van Insurance For 17,18 & 19 Year Old Drivers - Call Insure365 01782 898188, Free Legal Protection Cover Included valued at £25.00!
Terms: 1 Voucher Per Customer
Contact: 01782 898188
Valid until: Monday, June 24 2013
Critics say high costs are leading to fears about the politicisation of policing becoming a reality amid a shortage of independent candidates.
In Staffordshire, city councillor Joy Garner is representing Labour, and county councillor Matthew Ellis is standing for the Conservative party.
The poll currently looks set to remain a two-horse race.
Councillor Dave Conway, leader of the opposition City Independents group on Stoke-on-Trent City Council, believes independent candidates are being priced out of the poll.
He said: "I would have loved to have put somebody forward as a candidate.
"It is just unrealistic to be expected to find that amount of money without the backing of a big party. It is a very unfair system."
The number of independent candidates nationally is not yet known as formal nominations do not open until October 8.




Comments
by truestokie
Monday, September 10 2012, 11:07PM
“I trust this election to be straight as much as I would trust any of the elections held in this city.
The phrase "bent as a nine bob note" comes to mind here.
Its a fact political party's in England are nothing but hotbeds of corruption and slime.
This will be no different.
The police will be bought and paid for with party money.”
by Nicky_Davis_
Monday, September 10 2012, 2:22PM
“It's a disgrace but I'm not surprised. All the talk that these elected positions will allow capable independent candidates to put themselves forward is complete guff. This was always going to be a mechanism of political party dominance over more aspects of our lives, very thinly disguised as some sort of democracy. I've heard very little of substance from either of these candidates, just tired old shallow cliches. Joy Garner says she'll oppose police cuts, but there's little credibility in that given she sits there on SOT City Council voting through no end of other cuts that severely impact on people. Matthew Ellis wants to cut down on paperwork etc. Yes I want police on the streets, ideally rounding up all the drug dealers and stopping cigarettes and alcohol getting to underage teens. But there needs to be some 'paperwork' or at least computer filework. Police should act but there has to be accountability, there needs to be records, to protect possibly innocent members of the public and police officers alike and assess effectiveness of police work. Is there any point voting? Well, I'll vote, it may be a spoilt ballot or I may figure out the least bad option. I think it's worth turning out to vote, a large number of spoilt ballots would signal lack of confidence of the public in the system or candidates.”
by BucknallMel
Monday, September 10 2012, 2:15PM
“The best way to protest this is to go along and write None of the Above across the ballot paper. If we do this in our thousands, and inform the press of it, we might get our point across.”
by truestokie
Monday, September 10 2012, 12:34PM
“Hardnose, and Dizzy 1960 spot on.
Labour voted against this post, which just goes to show what hypocrites they are, and whoever gets in will screw the expenses rotten.
It will cost the tax-payer millions.”
by hardnose
Monday, September 10 2012, 12:13PM
“Well said by Dizzy 1960,The person to take charge of the police,is called a Chief Constable,not some lefty councilor who would allow the low life that roam our streets,get away with murder,”
by mole10
Monday, September 10 2012, 11:29AM
“Undoubtedly, we will vote in an unnecessary candidate into an unnecessary job and Labour's candidate fits this description perfectly.”
by strandedhere
Monday, September 10 2012, 11:11AM
“Spread over a year,that comes to about 300 pounds a week to stand as a candidate,plus loss of earnings.”
by Dizzy1960
Monday, September 10 2012, 11:06AM
“So the people of Stoke-on-Trent will have to choose between a LabRat or ConArtist for Police Commissioner and with the assistance of the Corrupt Prosecution Service our council's illegal dealings will be kept well under wraps.
Of cause it's undemocratic. But when has this city being any different?”