Confusion reigns over who owns vacant Woolies

Trusted article source icon
Monday, April 13, 2009
Profile image for This is Staffordshire

This is Staffordshire

THE future of Stoke-on-Trent's former Woolworths stores is still in doubt three months after they shut – because no-one knows who owns them.

Stoke-on-Trent City Council is currently carrying out urgent land registry searches to try to determine who is responsible for four void shops around the city.

The stores in Hanley, Stoke, Longton and Burslem were all closed in late December or early January following the High Street retail giant's sudden collapse.

Administrator Deloitte shut all 807 Woolworths stores in the UK, with the loss of 27,000 jobs, after failing to find a buyer for the retailer.

Since then, some of the chain's outlets have been sold off to big-name firms such as frozen food retailer Iceland.

But none of the city stores were included in the deal, and their future remains as uncertain now as it was in December.

Longton Chamber of Trade vice-chairman Richard Cresswell, pictured, said residents and traders in the town are anxious to see something done with the Market Street outlet.

He said: "The loss of Woolworths has certainly dampened things down in that part of the town. I have had people stopping me in the street to ask what is going on with the store.

"We really need to get something done soon because we are trying to regenerate Longton and having empty shops doesn't help."

Newly-appointed Stoke town regeneration manager, Kevin Bell, also has concerns about the former Woolworths store in London Road.

He said the council is taking steps to determine the ownership of the site as part of its efforts to revitalise the town centre.

The empty store is of particular concern because of its prominent location in the main shopping street and the fact that it backs on to the market area in South Wolfe Street, just yards from the council's new £3 million library and resource centre.

Mr Bell said: "We are running a land registry search to find out who owns Woolworths and what their intentions are so we can plan what to do with that part of the town. It isn't helpful to have such a prominent store lying empty."

The city council said it is also unsure of the current ownership of the outlets in Market Square, Hanley, and St John's Square, Burslem, as they may have been sold on separately by the administrators and could even have changed hands again.

Richard Day, chairman of Hanley's chamber of trade, said he was surprised there was still uncertainty about the ownership of the stores. And he said it is vital the future of the properties is confirmed so talks can take place about what will happen to them.

He said: "It is important these stores are re-let as soon as possible because they create a hole in the towns and city centre.

"If the council can find out who owns them than at least a dialogue can take place on how they can dress up the windows and make the shops look a bit more attractive than they do now."

The ownership of Newcastle's Woolworths store, in High Street, has been confirmed and the borough council is in touch with the owner's agent about the site.

4
Tweet this article
Report

4 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Steve, Newcastle

    Tuesday, April 14 2009, 12:36PM

    “Warren,

    The council would not need to know who owns every single property in the city. As for the rates, they would have been paid by Woolworths direct to the council.

    The government will be aware of who owns the property, hence the search through land registry details... But as the units have probably been owned for some time by the same landlords these may not be computerised as yet so would be difficult to locate.

    It is the complete negative attitude of some residents that give Stoke such a negative outlook. Perhaps if people were more positive about the city then more could be done to improve things and also tempt companies in. But when everyone is all to willing to strike and down tools as soon as they don't get exactly what they want (yes I do mean the Stoke Post Office storey) then employers just see local workers as lazy and trouble makers so go elsewhere...

    As soon as people realise that change is inevitable and a good thing then this city will continue to get left behind...”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Darren, Stone

    Tuesday, April 14 2009, 12:03PM

    “Warren

    The business rates would have been paid by Woolworths, not the building owner.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by amron, stoke

    Tuesday, April 14 2009, 10:47AM

    “I agree. this is typical of joke-on-trent city council. this area is just not connecting with the rest of the nation, remember smoke-on-trent? then again the council are not connecting with the local population either. we are in a total mess in this city and it doesn't look as though it's going to get any better.”

  • Profile image for This is Staffordshire

    by Warren, Stoke on Trent

    Tuesday, April 14 2009, 5:27AM

    “How can this happen, only in this city would no-body know who owns 4 rarthe large shops. Woolies must have payed rent to someone, rates must have been payed to the council, its Joke on Trent again, lthouh its weaig more then a bit thin now.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters