'Government's benefit reforms will not work without new jobs'
SOCIAL welfare organisations have warned the Government's benefit reforms will not work without new jobs.
They say the proposals, outlined by Iain Duncan Smith yesterday, are based on the wrong assumption all people are motivated by money and stay on benefits because they are financially better off.
-

ANGRY: Geoff Cubley, left, with his son son Chris, who is unable to work after being assaulted 14 years ago.
The Work and Pensions Secretary's consultation paper, 21st Century Welfare, outlines options to rectify the "illogical" position of benefits paying more than work.
The proposed changes aim to simplify the system and make it financially worthwhile for people on benefits to work.
In Stoke-on-Trent, 35,150 people, almost a quarter of the working-age population, exist on some form of unemployment benefit.
Gill Brown, chief executive of homeless charity Brighter Futures, based in Hanley, said the problem was more to do with the lack of jobs in the area.
She said: "Is it to do with a work ethic, or is it about ensuring people have the opportunity to work? It wasn't the people in Blurton and Bentilee who asked for the pot banks to be closed.
"In my experience of my customers, they are keen, willing and motivated. They just need to be given the right opportunity.
"The Government should concentrate more on creating high-value jobs in the area before introducing radical reforms like this, which will penalise the most vulnerable."
The Government believes that because of the effect of 'marginal tax rates', the combination of lost benefits and the tax on earned income, millions of people calculate it is not worth taking a job.
It is proposed that when earnings are not much greater than benefit entitlement, they should be topped up.
Ministers want a system where claimants would be better off by up to 40p in every pound extra they earn.
Simon Harris, chief executive at Stoke-on-Trent Citizen's Advice Bureau, said: "What they are proposing is the Holy Grail of benefit reform. This has been attempted in the past, but people have lacked the money or political courage to succeed."
But he criticised the theory behind the reforms that everyone was motivated by money.
He said: "Recent figures show there are nearly five people chasing every job at the Jobcentre.
"Bearing in mind the job losses we are going to experience in the public sector, employment is going to rise significantly over coming months.
"You have to question whether enough jobs will have been created by the time these radical reforms have been brought in."
Geoff Cubley, whose son Chris nearly died after an unprovoked assault outside Valentino's nightclub in Hanley in 1996, said he did not agree with the proposed change to the system.
Since the attack the 34-year-old, of Abbey Hulton, has had to deal with a range of physical and mental disabilities.
He recently had his disability living allowance stopped.
Mr Cubley, aged 63, of Rotterdam Road, Poolfields, said: "Before his accident, my son had a really good work ethic and worked all his life in vehicle maintenance in mechanics. The truth is, he just can't work now."











50 Comments
View all
by David, S-O-T
Tuesday, August 03 2010, 3:42PM
“Well. Been getting a bit old this year. Had a letter about my glass back, the reason I use a stick. From the specialist Says there's a 20% chance an operation will leave me in need of total care semi paralised for the rest of my life. Worth going for, I thought, all the same. Quality of life and all that, but do you know what Anon. Now you can get off off your opinionated backside and go earn ME some cash. And Mick - plaease try and take anything away that I've worked for and I will cut your fingers off same as I would do to any petty house thief. Cause and effect in action. Learn it. Or leave at least some of us in peace before you regret it.”
by Mick Penning, newcastle, staffs
Monday, August 02 2010, 11:16PM
“The 'benefits culture' would take a serious downturn if those on it for more than 6 months had their tv taken off them.
The four walls would do wonders for the 'will to work'.”
by Tonyjohnt, Hanley
Monday, August 02 2010, 4:57PM
“The milk of human kindness doesn't so much flow as gush through this site at times. Yet another brave and worthy "anon" full of spite and venom, how do they find the time to post when so many kittens need torturing?”
by Anon, Staffordshire
Monday, August 02 2010, 4:11PM
“Hello all you glass backs and walking stick wavers, get a job, you idle set of gits.”
by Johntoe, Stokie up north Whie eye man,
Sunday, August 01 2010, 5:25PM
“Paul,
I see what you are saying,
BUT I am an ordinary working bloke, left school at 15 in 1968,
and I have worked the majority of the time since then,
some times for less than I would have got on benefits,
I have worked in the pits the pots and Shelton bar, and on Iron foundries,
So I am well aware of what "hard work" is and am not 'afraid' of it,
I have also had many periods of unemployment, a few times for over a year, my longest ever period being almost 3 years,
and at any time during those periods of unemployment had a job been offered or advertised for someone to do general community work at the national minimum wage, a REAL job, I would have applied for it,
BUT, what I will NEVER do is work for LESS than the minimum wage, not if I am treated like a common criminal I wont,
being made redundant is NOT a crime,
Forcing people to do community service is what we do to convicted criminals,
Treat me as a criminal and I WILL become one,
Perhaps an incentive would be to offer the long term unemployed community work at the Nat Min wage for perhaps one or two days a week with NO loss of benefits,
i am confident that should they be offered 1 or 2 days work a week at the national minimum wage, without it being taken off their benefits, there would be no shortage of volunteers,
MOST people want to work, they just want a wage that makes it worthwhile,”