Care workers in North Staffordshire homes face £400 cut in wages

Trusted article source icon
Saturday, November 24, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

HUNDREDS of former NHS staff are fighting plans to cut their wages by up to £400 a month.

The 200-plus nurses and care assistants in 10 North Staffordshire homes for people with learning disabilities face being forced onto new downgraded contracts by a national charity which now employs them.

  1. FIGHT: Community health branch secretary Jenny Harvey.

    FIGHT: Community health branch secretary Jenny Harvey.

The houses and bungalows opened nearly 20 years ago to care for patients moved from Stallington hospital in Blythe Bridge, which closed in 1996.

The staff were employed by Combined Healthcare mental health trust until Turning Point won the contract to provide the service two years ago.

8kg 1400 spin A+++ rated washer
with a full 6 year warranty - yes SIX years
delivered FAST & FREE
was OVER £600 - For a limited time ONLY £449.90
Amazing value!!!

Terms: 8kg 1400 spin A+++ rated washer
with a full 6 year warranty - yes SIX years
delivered FAST & FREE
was OVER £600 - For a limited time ONLY £449.90
Amazing value!!!

Contact: 01782 342609

Valid until: Saturday, June 01 2013

Now the charity says it must review their pay and conditions to protect jobs as cuts in local authority and health budgets start to bite.

But union leaders have vowed to fight the move and called on North Staffordshire NHS fundholders to take the contract off Turning Point when it is up for renewal in the next few years.

They claim any cash saved will be used to plug gaps in services in other towns and cities.

The dispute involves around 2,600 staff Turning Point employ in its learning disabilities sector across the country.

Some of the affected 90 local staff in health union Unison met in Hanley last night to draw up battle plans.

Afterwards North Staffordshire community health branch secretary Jenny Harvey said: "We cannot possibly accept this attack on our hard-working members and we will fight it.

"The timing leading up to Christmas couldn't be worse.

"Turning Point wants to rip up their contracts, sack them and put them on new terms and conditions, which would lose them up to £400 a month in the worst cases.

"When they transferred from the NHS those conditions were protected by law under the Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment (TUPE) regulations.

"And that was fully funded by the NHS commissioners from budgets earmarked for North Staffordshire people.

"So the money Turning Point will save if this goes through must be to fill gaps in their service delivery elsewhere in the country."

Unison's West Midlands office says the charity's annual profits have grown to £302,000 over the past three years.

Regional officer Andrew Johnson said: "It is through the efforts of its staff that Turning Point has grown and makes a profit and its reward to them is to drive down pay and conditions.

" We call on the commissioning organisations to ensure that when the contracts are up for renewal Turning Point is not considered."

Turning point admits the changes would affect unsociable hours payments but some staff on the lowest rates will have an increase.

Spokesman Laura Conn added: "The proposals are to protect as many jobs as possible by reviewing changes to our terms and conditions of employment."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for johnwhite18

    by johnwhite18

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 9:11PM

    “It's a old Tory law your T&C say the same for 52 weeks unless your new one's are better come on trade unions start looking after your members after all you are more then happy taking the sub's”

  • Profile image for Robnoxious

    by Robnoxious

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 7:08PM

    “The reason for the TUPE agreement is to give the employee some protection. In this case it seems as if they are not making as much profit as they would like. This being put out to tender in the first instance, if they have got their figures wrong when putting in for this contract, that is their mistake. If they can not operate within the amount of money that contract states they should either stop operating in full, giving up all the contracts with the NHS or at least in part of them. But that will not happen, simple reason being, when up for renewal they will not get them, or should not, they will be deemed as risk, like any business. But the employee should be protected, as this is some kind of partnership, they should be taking notice what is going on here. What will these people do next, gradually take away services provided to these people. Profit before care. It will be your NHS PENSION NEXT. i assume you went across to these people with that still being intact. Privatisation in these areas tend to lead to ,worse pay, worse conditions for both staff and service users/ patient . Good Luck and Fight it.”

  • Profile image for 7buster

    by 7buster

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 5:42PM

    “Unlike combined healthcare who get their money from the tax payer ie a bottomless pit of money, Turning Point don't have this luxury as all their money has to be accounted for and if the books don't balance someone gets into trouble.
    The reason for these former NHS employees losing their NHS jobs is down to the Liebour party and UNISON. And the fact that Jenny Harvey has said "We cannot possibly accept this attack on our hard-working members and we will fight it" shows UNISON policy for what it is.”

  • Profile image for johnboy2011

    by johnboy2011

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 4:18PM

    “Putting workers on temporary contracts, and then sacking them at the end of the contact and reinstating them for less pay, was something that Mrs T brought out in the 1980s after she clobbered the unions. Its exploitation, the nurses have my every sympathy.”

  • Profile image for EgbertTheOgg

    by EgbertTheOgg

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 3:57PM

    “"the charity's annual profits have grown to £302,000"

    How can a 'charity' make a profit?

    How about cutting this 'charity's executive pay instead, after all it is a 'charity' isn't it, and as such executives should be working for the benefit of the charity, not their personal gain.

    Oh, wait, it isn't really a charity at all is it, it's a business solely reliant on government contracts.

    http://tinyurl.com/c6ao8gh

  • Profile image for BedNinja

    by BedNinja

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 12:34PM

    “Completely unreasonable to expect the workers to take a drop in their pay of up to £100 per week, they are hardly going to be high earners to start with are they?”

  • Profile image for UmBongo

    by UmBongo

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 12:06PM

    “what the hell is that a picture of?”

  • Profile image for shotgun_tez

    by shotgun_tez

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 11:18AM

    “yet more pay cuts for the workers how about the bosses taking a pay cut”

  • Profile image for Goach

    by Goach

    Saturday, November 24 2012, 9:32AM

    “'Spokesman Laura Conn' I must say the name is very apt lol”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article