Campaigners declare 'war' on Stoke-on-Trent City Council after Hanley HQ move is approved

Trusted article source icon
Friday, March 22, 2013
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

CAMPAIGNERS have declared 'war' on a local authority after councillors refused to bow to public pressure and rethink plans to build a new £40 million civic headquarters.

Members of Stoke-on-Trent City Council last night voted to press ahead with relocating their HQ from Stoke to Hanley's new Central Business District. It came despite calls to refer the matter to a scrutiny committee for further debate.

  1. DISGUSTED: Richard Snell, from the Save Our Stoke.

    DISGUSTED: Richard Snell, from the Save Our Stoke campaign.

Now protesters have vowed to continue their campaign against the move.

Richard Snell, from the Save Our Stoke group, described the latest setback as a 'skirmish'.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Friday, May 31 2013

The 67-year-old, from Stoke, said: "We won't stop just because they want us to. I've never been more disgusted at a council. Its behaviour towards the people of Stoke-on-Trent is appalling."

At last night's full council meeting, campaigners presented a 1,397-signature internet and paper petition to the authority.

Deputy council leader Paul Shotton said he appreciated the public's concerns.

But he accused opposition politicians of 'playing to the public gallery' in speaking out against the relocation at such a late stage.

And Ruth Rosenau, cabinet member in charge of regeneration, said: "We have to make these decisions. They are brave decisions. They may not be popular, but they will benefit our city."

The new HQ, which was granted planning permission earlier this week, will house more than 1,000 council staff.

It will be built on land between Broad Street and Warner Street, in Hanley, and will be funded through council borrowing.

Politicians argue that by becoming the 'anchor tenant' for the new business district, they will be able to lever in millions of pounds of private investment and attract jobs.

But protesters claim it will be a waste of money to relocate the civic centre – just a few years after it was moved from the same spot in Hanley to Stoke.

Independent councillor Randy Conteh said: "I'm a firm believer in scrutiny. This is the second time I've asked colleagues to get round the table and debate the issue. Let's let people have their say."

Campaigner Stephen Parsons, aged 46, from Blurton, said after the meeting: "If they go ahead with this, Stoke is going to be dead."

16
Tweet this article
Report

16 Comments

  • Profile image for johnarc

    by johnarc

    Tuesday, March 26 2013, 3:20PM

    “There is a vital piece of information which needs clearing up.

    Some reports have said the new civic offices will cost amounts varying between £44 - £77 million, and that the council will take out a loan to fund it. What is the correct figure ?

    Other reports have said the the civic offices will be built by the developer, and that the city council will rent the building.

    Does anyone know which is correct ?”

  • Profile image for davidmayer2

    by davidmayer2

    Sunday, March 24 2013, 1:54PM

    “Where are all the voices FOR relocating the Civic Centre?

    Is there ANYONE outside the Council who thinks this scheme is "value for money"?

    I've said it before, but you get what you vote for. You could put a monkey in a Labour suit and he'll get in. Don't vote for a party - vote for your local indepandant, who WILL have YOUR interests at heart, NOT what his party leader tells him to.
    I really would like to have seen the last results if this wasteful move had been announced just before the last local elections.

    This isn't democracy.”

  • Profile image for pj123

    by pj123

    Saturday, March 23 2013, 3:01PM

    “Shotton and Rosenue are a disgrace this folly is not wanted or not needed.
    Its for your comfort and for the tax payer to pay for.
    I hope it falls down around your parasitic necks.
    You must be the most hated council in the history of this City.
    The Nazis were thought better of than you lot of petty dictators.”

  • Profile image for hmhonest

    by hmhonest

    Saturday, March 23 2013, 12:49PM

    “Best price matey,you best council leader ever matey,drive taxi Dresden,gold colour windows knock tree houses into one.best pricey mate,enough said.”

  • Profile image for fcranshaw

    by fcranshaw

    Saturday, March 23 2013, 11:50AM

    “Let the labour party know that no sitting member of the council will be re-elected at the next election. No expenses and no so called attendance allowance will concentrate their minds. Come on everyone vote against labour and their expensive habits in both local government and Westminster!”

  • Profile image for fcranshaw

    by fcranshaw

    Saturday, March 23 2013, 11:49AM

    “let the labour party know that no sitting member of the council will be re-elected at the next election. No expenses and no so called attendance allowance will concentrate their minds. Come on everyone vote against labour and their expensive habits in both local government and Westminster!”

  • Profile image for usversusthem

    by usversusthem

    Friday, March 22 2013, 8:27PM

    “I've just sent this email to all of our councillors and entitled it "A vote for Labour is a wasted vote."

    You, our Labour Councillors say that you are interested in creating jobs by bringing businesses into the planned CBD. Yet this Labour led council have introduced plans to extend the pedestrianized city centre further and fine motorists who fall foul of the new restrictions. Here is a comment by an owner of an existing business of how our council is "helping" the existing business infrastructure.

    "I have a business in hanley, i pay high rates only to get my streets lit. Ihave to pay extra to have my bins emptied. The pavements outside my shop are terrible and now they have taken away my loading bay and replaced it with a smaller one with a time restriction on it (loading until 10.00 am). And not access to my shop throughout the day. There are enough empty shops in Hanley, surely the council should be helping me not hindering me. Surely they must realise that if more shops shut because of the recession and the poor access into the town for shoppers and retailers by car the eventually that will mean less rates paid. Ever decreasing circles!!!!!"

    I don't know about you but I find that if I'm out shopping I don't need to worry about getting an expensive parking space, risk a £60 fine, having to trek great distances between shops past vacant premises and charity shops in an uninviting environment. In fact these are very good reasons not to visit Hanley. A fact which I can support as none of my family do actually shop there.

    Is it any wonder that so many businesses and city residents have shown that they have no confidence in this Labour controlled Council. The people of this city are starting to think about what the Labour Party and successive Council Officers have given us. We have one of the worst performing councils in the country yet we pay some of the highest salaries and allowances for this abysmal standard of performance. We have Councillors and Officers who are lacking in the basic economic and fiscal strategy skills as evidenced by this lack lustre performance and you are taking this city deeper and deeper into deprivation and poverty.
    Yet you ask us to trust you in securing our children and our grandchildren's futures by accepting a millstone of debt being placed upon us for a hated, ludicrous and undemocratic decision to move our civic centre. That would be like the Titanic backing up and ramming the iceberg again.

    You, our Labour Councillors and the Officers are not part of the solution - YOU ARE THE PROBLEM.

    SHAME ON YOU ALL.

    Alan Lear, Lightwood.”

  • Profile image for Jeffrey12011

    by Jeffrey12011

    Friday, March 22 2013, 7:25PM

    “Once again I am so proud that Paul Breeze is one of my councillors. I watched the council meeting on the web and Paul was absolutely spot on to have a go at that arrogant bullying undemocratic politically biased disgrace of a lord mayor Terry Crowe. And Paul was also spot on in saying that opposition to Labour is not called 'playing to the gallery' as Labour keep saying but is actually called 'listening to the people.' As to our other local councillor Mark 'slimeball' Meredith the sooner he goes the better, not just for Northwood and Birches Head but the city as a whole.
    Jeff Healey, Northwood”

  • Profile image for stepoult

    by stepoult

    Friday, March 22 2013, 6:45PM

    “when so many people are opposed to this new civic centre and so many services are being cut back you have to wonder why they are going ahead . Well what i would like to know is how much of this £40 million will find its way into some councillors back pockets as this can only be the reason why it is still going ahead”

  • Profile image for bobletbilly

    by bobletbilly

    Friday, March 22 2013, 6:21PM

    “Seriously folks, just let it go. Take a trip, have a beer, stop trying to emulate king Canute and get on with your lives.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article