Benefit plan is half-baked

Trusted article source icon
Monday, June 25, 2012
Profile image for The Sentinel

The Sentinel

MOST of us agree that Britain doesn't have the money to continue funding our welfare state in its current form. There has to be change – we cannot afford otherwise. For this reason it's not difficult to understand why, from the vantage point of Downing Street, David Cameron's suggestion that under-25s should be disqualified from receiving housing benefit might be seen as tough but rational. After all, why should the state pay for young adults to leave home? Let them stay with their parents like we all used to, so the argument goes. Unfortunately, in North Staffordshire – where youth unemployment is high and family breakdown is commonplace – the argument is seen for what it is: callous and ultimately self-defeating. In our region alone, there are thousands of young adults, many of them working, who have no parental home they could return to and who rely on housing benefit to keep them off the streets. Scrapping housing benefit would, for example, undo all the excellent work carried out by North Staffordshire YMCA, in Hanley. There would be an explosion in rough sleepers. Mr Cameron's suggestion fails to recognise the huge number of young adults, often from single-parent or no-parent families, who have been thrown out of their homes. These youngsters would inevitably end up in shop doorways.

And there's another good reason why ditching housing benefit would not help the public purse. For it would act as a big deterrent to youngsters who want to get on their bikes from areas of high unemployment, to find work. It would make unemployed job-seekers much less mobile, leaving them languishing on benefits for longer. In short, Mr Cameron's plan is half-baked and wholly unfeasible. It also risks alienating the generation of people we most need to help us recover from the global financial crisis.

Business Cards From Only £10.95 Delivered www.myprint-247.co.uk

myprint-247

View details

Print voucher

Our heavyweight cards have FREE UV silk coating, FREE next day delivery & VAT included. Choose from 1000's of pre-designed templates or upload your own artwork. Orders dispatched within 24hrs.

Terms: Visit our site for more products: Business Cards, Compliment Slips, Letterheads, Leaflets, Postcards, Posters & much more. All items are free next day delivery. www.myprint-247.co.uk

Contact: 01858 468192

Valid until: Wednesday, May 22 2013

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for lagu2

    by lagu2

    Tuesday, June 26 2012, 2:14AM

    “Just on about the tax issue, 5 companies and over 600 million lost in tax last year

    http://tinyurl.com/7ramfmn

    and thats only the tip of the iceberg”

  • Profile image for Bernwa

    by Bernwa

    Monday, June 25 2012, 8:57PM

    “Since the Jimmy Carr episode - isn't it amazing how quickly that story died?
    Huge sighs of relief could be heard all over the land as all those who use accountants to calculate their annual income relaxed again.
    If tax avoidance was outlawed (and it's quite easy really - just not on, you know), all manner of things would be possible.
    A fair and balanced benefits system (admittedly not the existing one) could be put into place, the National Health service could be prevented from dying the death it is now experiencing, and there would still be some left for the bankers!”

  • Profile image for Adampenkhull1

    by Adampenkhull1

    Monday, June 25 2012, 7:44PM

    “The 'debate' David Cameron wants to launch about reforming the welfare system has more to do with shoring up his own position with the Tory grassroots than helping people off benefits and back into work.

    He touched all the bases, talking about 'scroungers' and 'hard working families' and quoted examples of perverse incentives in the current system that were shocking enough to get his target audience going, but too vague to be checked.

    The benefits system does need to be reformed, but simply snatching away benefits is no way to go about doing so; if anything it will make existing problems worse.

    What is needed is decent training for unemployed people, particularly the over 50' and the under 25's, investment in social housing and, most important of all a plan for economic growth. There is also a need to reform the welfare system in a way that encourages claimants and the various agencies to work in partnership.

    Delivering these things would be a real tough challenge requiring equally tough decision to be taken as opposed to the empty rhetoric pumped out by a PM who isn't up to the job.”

  • Profile image for missweet21

    by missweet21

    Monday, June 25 2012, 7:35PM

    “If the Goverment would let people retire when they should then there would be jobs for the under 25 age group and over, my son was forced to sign on, but they told him dont expect help with training or college untill you have signed on for more then 2 years, he was gob smacked, he was 18 at the time, both my husband and I work full time so dont give me the 3rd degree about morals, I know where they stand ty, but the Goverment need to drop the retirement age back down to 60 years of age, let them enjoy life, whats left of it anyway, and make way for the youngsters because not all of them are bad, they need guidence and support, not ****ging off and put down.

    you lot were teenagers once, just put yourself in their shoes and look at what they have got......nothing!!!”

  • Profile image for Goach

    by Goach

    Monday, June 25 2012, 6:02PM

    “No benefits if you have never paid into the system would be a good start. No housing benefit for young girls that leave school and then start popping kids out. No child benefit after the third child (which incidently is being considered by the government). It is necessary to remove the temptation to make benefits a career choice. Working people are sick and tired of supporting the bone idle.”

  • Profile image for jackjones666

    by jackjones666

    Monday, June 25 2012, 3:34PM

    “It all goes back to education. Get a good education, get a good job, seems pretty simple.”

  • Profile image for bigmouth666

    by bigmouth666

    Monday, June 25 2012, 1:14PM

    “Get the rich people and Consurvative party donators to pay the tax they owe the country, that includes George Osboune and the PMs own famley members.”

  • Profile image for ElRealistico

    by ElRealistico

    Monday, June 25 2012, 12:22PM

    “Stop all forms of government payments to non UK citizens, let them work for 5 years before they are entitled, or go home.”

  • Profile image for Anon_mow_cop

    by Anon_mow_cop

    Monday, June 25 2012, 12:22PM

    “It's a basic law of economics, if you start to cut benefits on this scale the economy of some cities would literally collapse, because its only benefit money which is keeping them afloat.
    Even the Thatcher goverment in the 1980's found that out. I don't see this ever becoming legislation, it's just to make the Tories look different from their current "bedfellows" the Liberals, and to be ready for the next general election, and will no doubt be consigned to the dustbin of history.”

  • Profile image for ElRealistico

    by ElRealistico

    Monday, June 25 2012, 12:22PM

    “Stop all forms of government payments to non UK citizens, let them work or go home.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article