£500,000 annual cost of empty council-owned buildings
ALMOST £500,000 is spent every year on paying for security and maintenance at council-owned buildings which are standing empty.
New figures show Stoke-on-Trent City Council will spend a total of £375,000 in 2012/13 on security at buildings which it owns but has no current use for.
-

And a further £115,000 is being spent on maintaining the buildings and paying utility bills for health and safety reasons.
Security costs are spent on boarding up buildings, installing security gates and paying private firms to fit alarms and carry out spot checks to deter vandals.
The figures do not include empty council houses, flats or garages, which incur significant additional security and maintenance costs.
Critics say empty buildings attract anti-social behaviour and worsen the appearance of the city.
Empty buildings running up costly security bills include the former Redhouse Crescent children's home, which has been closed for more than four years, as well as Fenton Library and City Farm in Bucknall which both closed due to council budget cuts.
Independent councillor Ann James, member for Great Chell and Packmoor, said: "There are a lot of buildings on the list that have been empty for a very long time.
"The issue has been debated before and I still don't understand why the council doesn't have arrangements in place for the buildings before it closes them down.
"Residents who live near to Redhouse Crescent have complained about anti-social behaviour at the building that wouldn't happen if it hadn't been left like that."
Empty council buildings in Burslem include the Wedgwood Institute, the indoor market and the town hall; part of the liquidated Ceramica Trust.
Ted Owen, aged 73, a Burslem resident and former Ceramica trustee, said: "It was short-sighted of the council to leave the old town hall empty.
"It makes no sense at all for it to be empty when it costs taxpayers so much money to keep it that way. It could be used as a housing office, a police station or even the library, but it's not value for money to keep it closed."
Plans are in place to sell some of the empty buildings, but others are set to remain empty.
Longton High School will be demolished to make way for the new Abbey Hill School and Performing Arts College, being rebuilt under the Building Schools for the Future programme.
The former Austin House care home in Abbey Hulton is in the process of being sold, as is Mary Bourne House in Bucknall.
Cauldon Park Depot could be handed to Stoke-on-Trent College.
The city council's former offices in Hill Street, Stoke could be demolished.
No plans are in place for mothballed buildings like Ubberley and Bentilee Workingmen's Club and Tunstall swimming pool.
Council leader Mohammed Pervez said: "The vacant properties may or may not be required for future council use. We may be keeping some buildings for regeneration purposes or relocation of staff."







9 Comments
by MarcFloyd
Monday, February 06 2012, 11:58AM
“re: rstanway
What about letting them out if they are not in use? This is how it works in real-life economy, where there is no taxpayer to pay for mismanagement!”
by rstanway
Sunday, February 05 2012, 10:35AM
“What is the value of the property The Sentinel is referring to that is costing the council so much?
It's of huge relevance to this story.
Let's think about the alternatives:
Would you prefer the council devalue the properties and causes local residents trouble by not securing them?
Would you rather the buildings were used by the council at a far higher cost?
Or do you prefer that the council sells the buildings? They COULD get very poor value for their assets and it may be worth holding on to them. I know a charity hoping to get an old council building for pittance! (they wont). What happens when the council wish to use a new building - should they pay far more for buildings as and when they need him?
I don't think it's right to pull the wool over readers eyes with half a story.”
by E_D_Wivens
Saturday, February 04 2012, 2:28PM
“there are buildings that are still occupied in Burslem? I thought they were all empty! I know a place up Hamil Road that's empty most Saturdays.....”
by BucknallMel
Saturday, February 04 2012, 1:34PM
“Since when was it the plan to move Abbey Hill School to the site of Longton High School? And when did Austin House go back on sale, after being withdrawn over the ridiculously low offering price? Is the Sentinel wrong or is this more council 'transparency'?”
by hemmo2008
Saturday, February 04 2012, 1:23PM
“under private ownership the costs would be half because they dont employ people on £132,000 + silly wages”
by watchword
Saturday, February 04 2012, 11:48AM
“I think it is called insecurity. Lets keep it just in case. Perhaps they should employ the external consultants to make the decisions for them!!
In any case why are Council Homes empty, is there too much housing stock in Stoke on Trent? Perhaps they could work out a deal through the Quango and pas them on to other councils who do not have enough.”
by CpnOatcake
Saturday, February 04 2012, 11:45AM
“The city council chief executive claims the city can cut the number of staff by a 1,000 and yet instead they waste money on commercial firms to protect buildings which should have been sold off years ago.”
by acornelkman
Saturday, February 04 2012, 11:26AM
“"The vacant properties may or may not be required for future council use. We may be keeping some buildings for regeneration purposes or relocation of staff."
Shouldn't he KNOW if required for future council use or not?
Shouldn't he KNOW if required for regeneration purposes or relocation of staff?
As soon as they knew a building was to be closed, what plans were made about it?
Demolish, refurbish, rent out, relocate staff there, keep empty?
It would be interesting to see what the council planned for each building and when any decisions were made.”
by watchword
Saturday, February 04 2012, 10:49AM
“Why not hand over suitable buildings to charities or voluntary organisations, even if only on a temporary basis, l am sur ehtey could find a use.
What about emergemcy shelters for the homeless.”